Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
At this point, Obama doesn’t NEED to offer proof. Those making the accusation are required to offer proof.

Hold that thought "at this point". The proof is being withheld from discovery by the courts...at this point.

Ever watch Perry Mason?

I've brought up Perry Mason a time or two on these threads. Your girl Obama may need to dig him up for her defense after all this is said and done.

105 posted on 10/13/2010 5:18:39 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel

“The proof is being withheld from discovery by the courts...at this point.”

Discovery in not a tool that allows someone without proof to gather some. If I accuse my neighbor of tax fraud, the courts will not allow me discovery and require my neighbor to turn over their financial records for my examination. I need evidence of wrongdoing BEFORE I go to court.

And this case is a bit unusual in that the de facto officer comes into play - even if Obama is found tonight to be a space alien, Obamacare will still be legally binding. And the orders given the military since 20 Jan 2009 would also still be legally binding, which is one of the reasons the judge refuses to pursue Obama’s birth certificate: It isn’t relevant to the case.


123 posted on 10/13/2010 5:35:30 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson