This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 08/30/2010 8:09:46 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 08/29/2010 8:16:02 PM PDT by hercuroc
I cant spend all of my time with my birth certificate plastered on my forehead, quipped Obama, who took a deep breath to gather his thoughts when asked if the poll reflected his inability to communicate with voters.
The facts are the facts. We went through some of this during the campaign there is a mechanism, a network of misinformation that in a new media era can get churned out there constantly, said a visibly annoyed Obama, referring to birthers, who have waged a guerrilla campaign questioning either the existence or the validity of his Hawaiian birth certificate.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
>>”Obama will not get his name on the ballots without his eligibility/qualifications being challenged. There is a short window of time for challenging placement on the ballot; by the time people realized that Fukino and everybody else in Hawaii are big-time liars for Obama, that window was past. Never again.”
>
>Ok, in what state and who is going to challenge that? We need to be ready and have our ducks in a row.
How much do you want to bet that, if he does go up for reelection, people will be making the excuse that “he doesn’t need to show proof of eligibility, because he was the president before, and that proves his eligibility.”?
How about a nice little bar code instead?
>Still, if it were not for American Constitutional process (painful as it surely is), these monsters would require global nuclear war to be stopped. Sometimes I think that’s exactly what they want to bring about anyway, whether or not they win.
Or high-velocity metallic projectiles / Henry Bowman.
“What they finally got him on was exactly this federal statute, but he was acting in the capacity of an ILLINOIS official, trying to sell a Senate seat.
OK, now I see the connection. Per se, lying about HI’s administrative rules is against Hawaiian statutes, which isn’t under federal jurisdiction. But you’re saying it’s in the service of perpetuating a fraud whereby Obama illegally draws a federal salary and has control over the spending of a vast amount of federal funds. In terms of prosecution, it’s far easier to build a case on raw facts—i.e., Fukino did or did not lie/misrepresent what Hawaiian required—than a case built around proving the motivation behind the lying. Unless there’s a smoking gun memo that nails down her frame of mind, I would guess that proving motivation would be pretty difficult. So you may be correct in a technical sense, but I’m guessing that even with an Attorney General with integrity in place, a federal prosecution against Fukino would be unlikely. JMO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.