Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP plans wave of White House probes
Politico ^ | August 27, 2010 | Glenn Thrush

Posted on 08/27/2010 4:53:43 AM PDT by Second Amendment First

If President Barack Obama needed any more incentive to go all out for Democrats this fall, here it is: Republicans are planning a wave of committee investigations targeting the White House and Democratic allies if they win back the majority.

Everything from the microscopic – the New Black Panther party – to the massive –- think bailouts – is on the GOP to-do list, according to a half-dozen Republican aides interviewed by POLITICO.

Republican staffers say there won’t be any self-destructive witch hunts – but they are clearly relishing the prospect of extracting information from an administration that touts transparency.

And a handful of aggressive would-be committee chairmen – led by Reps. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) and Lamar Smith (R-Tex.) – are quietly gearing up for a possible season of subpoenas not seen since the Clinton wars of the late 1990s.

Issa would like Obama’s cooperation, says Kurt Bardella, spokesman for the ranking Republican on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. But it’s not essential.

“How acrimonious things get really depend on how willing the administration is in accepting our findings [and] responding to our questions,” adds Bardella, who refers to his boss as “Questioner-in-Chief.’

That’s feeding anxieties within the West Wing – even if administration officials won’t admit it publicly.

“I actually think it will be even worse than what happened to Bill Clinton, because of the animosity they already feel for President Obama,” says Lanny Davis, a deputy White House counsel who lived through Clinton’s trials.

With that in mind, here’s a list of six possible committee investigations if Republicans take back the House in November, culled from GOP aides, Democratic insiders and outside experts:

Sestak, Romanoff and Jobgate. Most of the Clinton-era investigations – from Whitewater to Vince Foster to the Lewinsky scandal — targeted the president personally.

Most potential GOP probes of Obama, by contrast, seem to be aimed at the administration’s periphery or policies – with the ironic exception of the one that revolves around – yep — Bill Clinton.

Issa has made no secret of his interest in getting to the bottom of muddled, mishandled White House attempts to force Democratic Senate candidates Joe Sestak and Andrew Romanoff from races in Pennsylvania and Colorado.

White Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina sent Romanoff an email with several potential non-Senate job possibilities; Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel enlisted Clinton to dangle the possibility of several unpaid executive branch appointments to Sestak in exchange for allowing Republican-turned-Democrat Arlen Specter to run unopposed. Sestak said no – and trounced Specter.

White House counsel Bob Bauer – the veteran election lawyer who would be Obama’s first legal line of defense against the GOP – has said no laws were broken. So have some GOP lawyers, but Issa isn’t convinced – and has called on Attorney General Eric Holder to investigate.

Privately, Issa’s staff is afraid of taking it too far. The backlash against Republican investigations in the Newt Gingrich era is fresh in his mind.

He’s told associates he doesn’t want to be labeled another Dan Burton – a reference to the overzealous Indiana Republican oversight chairman who once shot at a pumpkin in his backyard to re-enact Vince Foster’s death.

“If Republicans go on an investigative witch hunt when and if they gain power in November, then their power will be very short lived,” said Mark McKinnon, a former George W. Bush adviser sympathetic to Obama. “The American public wants Congress to work together, not to investigate each other.”

Bailouts, Bailouts, Bailouts. No investigation poses a more significant political danger to Obama than a no-holds-barred GOP probe into TARP, the AIG bailout, the Freddie-Fannie sinkhole and the administration’s de facto takeover of GM and Chrysler.

Reason One: Perhaps the only issue uniting all voters is a shared hatred of all bailouts – so few Democrats, even die-hard liberals, would be willing to stand in front of a bus to defend Obama against attacks.

Reason Two: One GOP aide described the bailouts as a “huge pool” from which to make document and email requests – and issue subpoenas. The prospect of a massive – and popular -- fishing expedition at the West Wing’s expense would delight the Republican base and create a political headache for the president’s team.

Issa seriously rattled Democrats earlier this summer by revealing the lengths he’s willing to go to obtain information – asking Google executives if they would be willing to turn over Gmail messages pertaining to administration business.

“If he comes at them, the White House will then have to make up its mind: Will they let their lawyers take over or will they let the political people run the show?” says Lanny Davis, who counsels Obama to turn over as much as possible as quickly as possible to avoid allegations of stonewalling.

“If Rahm Emanuel is still Chief of Staff, they will have a huge advantage – he’s been through this before and he’ll push back against the lawyers,” added Davis.

Countrywide Mortgage and “Angelo’s List.” Sen. Chris Dodd’s embarrassing placement on the company’s VIP mortgage list played a major role in the Connecticut Democrat’s involuntary retirement earlier this year.

Issa – using only the bully pulpit – has already forced Countrywide’s parent, Bank of America, to turn over reams of documents. If he becomes chairman, Issa will use the committee’s power to obtain more information on sweetheart deals, even if it involves GOP politicians, according to a person close to him.

“I think the White House is underestimating him,” says a top Congressional Democratic aide. “What makes him so dangerous is that he’s willing to turn on Republicans too.”

The New Black Panther Party. Smith, the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, has already pressed Holder to look into charges that members of the New Black Panther Party intimidated voters at a Philadelphia polling place in 2008.

The San Antonio-area conservative – whose first campaign was managed by Karl Rove – is already on record criticizing Holder for dropping the Justice Department case against three Panthers, including one who brandished a police-style baton.

“Congress, in furtherance of its oversight obligations [needs] to receive answers” on the Panther case, he wrote in late 2009.

“Congressman Smith thinks it’s far too early to discuss any possible investigations before the voters have spoken,” said a Smith spokesman, before adding:

“But, yes, we would definitely want answers about the Black Panther case.”

ACORN. A whole host of Republicans – led by Reps. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) and Steve King (R-Iowa) on the party’s right wing – have demanded an investigation into the defunct community organizing group’s ties to the Obama campaign.

Still, neither Issa nor Smith are said to be enthusiastic about jumping back into the controversy – considering the fact that ACORN is out of business and most Democrats have already signed on to a bill barring federal funding of the group.

Related: Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Tex.) – who stands a chance of leap-frogging Spencer Bachus (R-Ala.), the ranking GOPer on the House Financial Services Committee – is pushing for a large-scale investigation of the Community Reinvestment Act.

Minerals Management Service. The juiciest Bush-era revelations about the agency’s shortcomings have already been aired – including the fact that some MMS employees allegedly had sexual relations with workers they were supposed to oversee.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar has already admitted MMS officials were asleep at the switch in monitoring BP’s Deepwater Horizon platform before it blew up. But Issa is bent on finding out which Obama administration officials were responsible for missing the warning signs – and why clean-up and response efforts didn’t take place more quickly.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: acorn; blackpanthers; darrellissa; democrats; investigation; investigations; issa; journ0list; newblackpanthers; rottendems; union; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
Time to turn the lights on and see how bad the roach problem is in this most "transparent" of administrations.
1 posted on 08/27/2010 4:53:44 AM PDT by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

The idea of the Rinocratic Oligarchy probing itself seems more than a little obscene.


2 posted on 08/27/2010 4:55:09 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

I’d rather hear at least an attempt at a spending freeze before any investigations.

Used to be that was SOP in bad financial times, now it’s never mentioned. Yes, I want investigations but for God’s sake, stop the bleeding before you worry about what caused it.


3 posted on 08/27/2010 4:58:24 AM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

“according to a half-dozen Republican aides”

Someone needs to clean house..


4 posted on 08/27/2010 4:58:31 AM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Politico only writes this story because it hopes that somehow it will send a negative message..... Republicans are only interested in investigating their opponents, have no plans to do anything worth wile should they be elected.
5 posted on 08/27/2010 4:59:45 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge ( PALIN / HOLTZ 2012 If you vote Democrat you support infanticide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

I wanna know who crashed the market in September of 2008, just prior to the election, causing us to crap out $ 700 billion dollars in TARP !!!!!


6 posted on 08/27/2010 5:01:36 AM PDT by Daisyjane69 (Michael Reagan: "Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Because of ACORN, Missouri has this fright wig in the senate named Claire McCaskill.
7 posted on 08/27/2010 5:02:05 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Are you kidding?

Republicans are too busy trying to steal elections from conservatives.

They would never investigate Obama. They have been too bust assisting him the past year and a half.
8 posted on 08/27/2010 5:04:08 AM PDT by Minus_The_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Another distraction from their planned inaction...


9 posted on 08/27/2010 5:06:36 AM PDT by Caipirabob ( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Forget the investigations and focus on fiscal responsibility!


10 posted on 08/27/2010 5:06:39 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
I want very badly to have the lights turned on. But, even more than that, I want vast areas of the government defunded and eliminated. Turn off the money spigot to all leftist causes and groups. Just as the Obama administration came out swinging with vast favoritism and spending programs, the Republicans should come out swinging with the elimination of funding all things that keep the Democrats in power.

One of the most STUPID things I have read is that Republicans would be hesitant to eliminate jobs people have just been hired for under Obama. Well, these newly hired bureaucrats are going to make life miserable for millions of Americans, and we should be concerned about THEIR jobs? Piss on the all. Fire 90% of the Government.

11 posted on 08/27/2010 5:07:46 AM PDT by Enterprise (As a disaster unfolds, a putz putts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
While there may be some room for a few well-timed investigations, spending the next two years fighting the Obama administration in this way will be bad for the GOP's prospects in 2012. If you think the media's carried water for Obama to date, it would be nothing compared to what the future would bring.

The GOP needs to stick to the basics. Challenge and put forth bills to repeal and defund Obamacare; reign in spending significantly, and above all, start sending pro-business signals to turn the economy around.

12 posted on 08/27/2010 5:09:25 AM PDT by Lou L (The Senate without a fillibuster is just a 100-member version of the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

id rather see them undo whats been done


13 posted on 08/27/2010 5:10:14 AM PDT by Revelation 911 (How many 100's of 1000's of our servicemen died so we would never bow to a king?" -freeper pnh102)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

If this article is indeed true (and I’m dubious), this is a very bad idea. The main and secondary concentration should be the economy. How to trim budgets and cut back the federal largeses and how to unleash the economy from it’s federal shackles.

If they get bogged down in subpeonas and fighting against Obama, they will look as out of touch as Democrats do right now and make Obama a sympathetic figure. No, make him veto or sign bills that would help the economy.


14 posted on 08/27/2010 5:11:16 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mo
I would like a plan to reduce the size of Govt. pay down the debt and jump start the economy.
That is what is driving Americans crazy. That is what many people want who rally under the tea party affiliation. Don't blow this opportunity on fishing expeditions.
15 posted on 08/27/2010 5:12:13 AM PDT by reefdiver ("Let His day's be few And another takes His office")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Lets see if they can do a better job then the last time when the Rats made them look like fools.


16 posted on 08/27/2010 5:13:17 AM PDT by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

If the republicans do gain control of Congress and do nothing but launch one investigation after another I was never vote for another Republican in my life. This country has enormous problems to address. Getting people back to work and cutting spending are jobs 1 and 2.


17 posted on 08/27/2010 5:16:37 AM PDT by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

I don’t know whether a “wave of investigations” is a good idea or not, but I do know this: if the house Republicans don’t choose a solid, articulate, principled spokesman who can articulate the reason for each investigation and to keep the media apprised of each investigation’s progress and the meaning of the results obtained, on a daily basis, the democrat/media axis will kill them. It’ll be all racism, all homophobia, all class warfare, all the time, until 2012, when Obama will sail to a second-term victory and (there’s a good chance) the GOP will be turned out of power once again.


18 posted on 08/27/2010 5:18:10 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

sniff......sniff..... is that the smell of fear?


19 posted on 08/27/2010 5:18:45 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Greetings Jacques. The revolution is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

The left cringes when they see their own tactics used against them.


20 posted on 08/27/2010 5:21:08 AM PDT by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson