Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Says Gay Marriages Won't Resume In California Until Next Wednesday
Fox40 ^

Posted on 08/12/2010 12:44:17 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998

SACRAMENTO - Judge Vaughn Walker has lifted a stay in order regarding last week's verdict that stated Proposition 8, California's law that defined marriage as a union between one man and one woman, is unconstitutional.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; US: California
KEYWORDS: caglbt; gayjudge; gaystapo; homobama; homosexualagenda; judicialtyranny; lavendermafia; marryadog; perverts; prop8; samesexmarriage; sodomhusseinobama; sodomitejudge; vaughnwalker; wedyourhorse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last
To: freedomwarrior998

Wow! What a shocker!


41 posted on 08/12/2010 1:00:30 PM PDT by RexBeach ("Duty is ours; consequences are God's." Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

‘Walker seems to imply that those defending Prop 8 wouldn’t even have standing to appeal’

Walker: I’m the god! No one may challenge my decision!


42 posted on 08/12/2010 1:00:30 PM PDT by edge10 (Obama lied, babies died!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Moose4
The fagots and the progressives are going to reap the whirlwind one day.

What about a US amendment.Ie federal defense of marriage amendment

43 posted on 08/12/2010 1:00:51 PM PDT by Charlespg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

I am begging you in California to thro thi stryannical bastard out of his office and dare the judiciary to enforce their BS decision from his bench. DO it...show who the people are...the ones in charge and NOT the black robes of tryanny.


44 posted on 08/12/2010 1:01:19 PM PDT by ICE-FLYER (God bless and keep the United States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

I heard a Black Preacher on TV last night say:

Regarding Homosexuals...

*I am sick and tired of homosexuals comparing thier SIN to my SKIN*!


45 posted on 08/12/2010 1:02:11 PM PDT by TaraP (He never offered our victories without fighting but he said help would always come in time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

Meanwhile, the feral Gerbil population has gone underground in anticipation of raucous jubilation by perverts.


46 posted on 08/12/2010 1:02:14 PM PDT by Gaffer ("Profiling: The only profile I need is a chalk outline around their dead ass!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

Walker has more power than the President. He can rule by decree and he holds his position for life.


47 posted on 08/12/2010 1:04:08 PM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998
Very interesting. I can't remember a time where a federal judge rear-ended (pun intended) the people so overtly- and on top of it got the final say. I find that scenario hard to believe. But we do live in a bizzaro world it seems.
48 posted on 08/12/2010 1:06:15 PM PDT by Clump (the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Yeah, but Judge Walker and his lot have a different definition of "equal" than what "equal protection" means. Equal protection means that the law is enforced equally upon everyone. Prop 8 was equally enforced so there was no violation of the clause.

You are probably right though, there are some recent cases that suggest that Kennedy is likely to side against Prop. 8 if it reaches SCOTUS. The court had better be cautious about redefining the clause though, because it could have a lot of unintended consequences.

49 posted on 08/12/2010 1:09:22 PM PDT by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

The Mormons (and others) tried to defend one-man-one-woman marriage and a judge has defeated their efforts.

Who will step up now?


50 posted on 08/12/2010 1:13:01 PM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (Patriotism: looking out for yourself by looking out for your country. ~ Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

The remarks on Shep’s chat room are almost as discussing.

I even tried to say something on it only to have my remark ignored.

I don’t understand how it is you can have a right to someone else recognizing and subsiding your activity as the State does marriage.

But the Federal usurper court does and as such we have a Nanny state whom a large number of dead beats are demanding their “right” to other peoples wealth, services, and recognition as being something other then an impostor.

It is indeed a sad state of affairs for theses once united States. I could only wish that we could ditch theses deadbeats and assume among the powers of the earth the totally separate but equal station as to deny them the possibility to rob us as they currently are using the government to do so.


51 posted on 08/12/2010 1:13:36 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clump

“If there was standing at the District Court level there is standing now too.”

Not necessarily. This is a difficult issue. Supreme Court precedent would indicate that if the state doesn’t take it forward, the interveners very likely don’t have standing.


52 posted on 08/12/2010 1:17:50 PM PDT by Kahonek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Choose Ye This Day

“The Mormons (and others) tried to defend one-man-one-woman marriage and a judge has defeated their efforts.

Who will step up now?”

How can you say the judge has defeated anything when the judge has the arbitrary authority to simply pick who wins and who loses? The Dictator didn’t defeat the he simply choose not to accept their position in pronouncing his dictates to overthrow the State constitution.

It is as this article says: http://www.catholic.org/politics/story.php?id=37755

The branch Hamilton called the least dangerous in Federalist #78 has become the most dangerous and the reason is that our politicians have betrayed us in allowing theses would be dictators uses of their swords.


53 posted on 08/12/2010 1:18:02 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

Be careful what you ask for, because you can’t beat God.


54 posted on 08/12/2010 1:19:53 PM PDT by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

Why have elections if a single judge can overturn the will of the people?


55 posted on 08/12/2010 1:21:34 PM PDT by reader25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ICE-FLYER
I am begging you in California to thro thi stryannical bastard out of his office and dare the judiciary to enforce their BS decision from his bench.

Judge Vaughn Walker is a FEDERAL judge not a Californian State judge. The only way to throw him out is retirement, death, or impeachment and Conviction by the US House and Senate. Everyone in the US can demand their representatives draft articles of impeachment against this judge.

56 posted on 08/12/2010 1:21:48 PM PDT by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Kahonek

“Not necessarily. This is a difficult issue. Supreme Court precedent would indicate that if the state doesn’t take it forward, the intervenes very likely don’t have standing.”

So your saying that if a leftist state like California sets up a constitutional dispute in which they are doomed to loose and doesn’t win in the Federal court they can set the presidents which dooms all other states?

Meaning one state can thou deception and mistrials help force a political policy on every other state via dictatorial federal judges.

What a corrupt system I don’t care if this is what the authors of our constitution had in mind if this is what they had in mind we have all been made a fool in accepting it.

Its time to leave this cursed, lawless, and oppressive “union”.


57 posted on 08/12/2010 1:22:29 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: chris37

I thought we had one.


58 posted on 08/12/2010 1:23:47 PM PDT by Fast Moving Angel (We'll remember in November!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

however the appellate courts can issue a stay.

HOWEVER if the plaintiffs are just going to argue religion then we lose.

They have to defeat the “born that way” physical behavior assumption.


59 posted on 08/12/2010 1:24:00 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: old republic
hard time to get mine to that.Time for a mass march on Washington DC.

I won't say any more except I won't shed a tear if fed up Americans drag this judge out of his house one night

60 posted on 08/12/2010 1:27:34 PM PDT by Charlespg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson