Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FREE SPEECH ISN'T FREE ACCORDING TO WISCONSIN
Noisyroom.net ^ | 8-6-2010 | AJ

Posted on 08/06/2010 7:49:18 PM PDT by Whenifhow

Wisconsin has enacted a law which makes political free speech subject to fees or jail time.

If you think this can’t happen in America… well… it just did. This law affects liberals, conservatives and those of every political persuasion. It affects every American, both inside and outside of WI, who communicate in any manner about candidates running for office in WI.

Whether you are supporting or opposing a candidate, gathering to demonstrate for or against a candidate, or even if you are using email or the Internet to express your opinion about a candidate, you are subject to fees or jail time.

In the dark of night, behind closed doors, WI enacted the new Government Accountability Board – G.A.B. 128 Rule which silences political free speech 60 days prior to the election. Conveniently, this law goes into effect on August 15, 2010 with little to no time for successful legal challenges prior to the November 2010 election.

The entire text of the G.A.B. 1 Rule can be found here (Sections 1.10, 1.28, and 1.42 are most revealing): http://www.legis.state.wi.us/rsb/code/gab/gab001.pdf

Under this new law, individuals and groups must pay a $100 registration fee to the state of WI if they want permission to use political speech that totals at least $25 “cumulatively in a calendar year.” But it doesn’t stop there…

Individuals and groups must set up a separate depository account and file a report with the Accountability Board and Secretary of State. They then need to provide periodic reports of every communication – explaining the type of communication/action for each and every episode of political free speech.

What WI did by adding G.A.B. 1.28 to the G.A.B. 1 Rule is to define political communication and actions in order to give the government the legal ability to regulate and monitor everything you say and do.

Expenses related to political free speech will include such things as a portion of your Internet bills, your phone bills, signs you’ve made, gas/bus fare to political gatherings, fliers, mailings, etc. These types of communication and action will easily total $25 per year for every American who wishes to exercise their 1st Amendment right to political free speech.

Essentially, WI has now abolished everyone’s Constitutional right to political free speech by enacting a law to ensure free speech is no longer free, and it’s now granted (or not granted), and monitored by the government.

This unconstitutional power grab by the government should outrage everyone on the political spectrum – left, right and everyone in between.

Just as the events of the Gulf Oil disaster unites everyone who cares about our Gulf Coast, this too is an issue that unites all of us.

If this new law stands in WI, it won’t be long before it spreads to other states throughout the country. Ohio is already moving in that direction: Bloggericide: Ohio Officials Charge Blogger With Campaign Violations. Will your state be next?

Here is the list of WI legislators who are responsible for taking away our right to political free speech – you may want to contact them via phone, email or letter before our right to free speech expires on August 15:

• Senator Russ Feingold (D)

• Senator Herbert H. Kohl (D)

• Governor Jim Doyle (D)

• Lieutenant Governor Barbara Lawton (D)

• Secretary of State Doug LaFollette (D)

• District 1 – Paul D. Ryan (R)

• District 2 – Tammy Baldwin (D)

• District 3 – Ron J. Kind (D)

• District 4 – Gwen Moore (D)

• District 5 – James F. Sensenbrenner (R)

• District 6 – Thomas E. Petri (R)

• District 7 – David R. Obey (D)

• District 8 – Steve Kagen (D)

With 77% of WI’s elected officials coming from the Democratic Party, clearly it’s been hi-jacked and it’s no longer the party we once knew. Their actions prove that they, AND the complicit Republicans, intend to strip us of our freedom and liberty.

When we allow government to grant “rights” to the American people, we are also granting them the power to take our rights away… and they just did.

From Gateway Pundit:

It should be pointed out that political speech was the very sort of free speech that the founders of this country were talking about when they crafted the First Amendment.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; democratcorruption; democrats; donttreadonme; electionfraud; elections; freespeech; gabrule; liberalfascism; politics; teaparty; unconstitutional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-189 next last
To: Mad Dawgg

Great tagline! ;-)


81 posted on 08/07/2010 4:11:51 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

This MUST be satire.


82 posted on 08/07/2010 4:13:31 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

Doesn’t look like it?

http://www.legis.state.wi.us/rsb/code/gab/gab001.pdf


83 posted on 08/07/2010 4:17:38 AM PDT by EBH (Our First Right...."it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: EBH

I took a quick skim of this and it all seems to be dealing with campaign finances. My quick skim found nothing about speech. I’ll have to more fully research this later.


84 posted on 08/07/2010 4:32:20 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: HollyB
I’m very concerned by the ‘quick to jump’ posts by newer members on this forum. Almost like they are looking for something that just isn’t there. It wasn’t like this in years past, at least nothing like it is now. It is helpful to read the complete post to gain a better understanding.

I did read it. You were using the events in Spain to rationalize an infringement on the free exercise of political speech here in America, do you also believe that the UK's banning of guns is ok in order to reduce crime.?

85 posted on 08/07/2010 5:15:58 AM PDT by JrsyJack (a healthy dose of buckshot will probably get you the last word in any argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

This is a state law so how are the Senators and Congressmen from the Federal govt. involved in this?


86 posted on 08/07/2010 5:22:29 AM PDT by raybbr (Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

“This is a state law so how are the Senators and Congressmen from the Federal govt. involved in this?”

The list should be a list state legislators. However, any congress member (federal or state) is complicit if they have NOT attempted to inform the public about the legislative process of the GAO Board (appointed members) initiating legislation.

Please see post #41

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2566195/posts#41


87 posted on 08/07/2010 5:36:23 AM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo; Admin Moderator

Here is the link, Please correct link on thread, Thanks!

http://noisyroom.net/blog/2010/08/06/free-speech-isn%E2%80%99t-free-according-to-wisconsin/


88 posted on 08/07/2010 5:41:05 AM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Okay, the list of officials responsible for what is a state law contains all members of the US House and Senate, and that doesn’t make any sense.

Although I don’t doubt the idiots in the Legislature with Gov Diamond Jim Doyle would slam something like this through in the middle of the night.

Frankly, the answer in this case is just massive civil disobedience, ignore it. We have a First Amendment right in the US Constitution and I would DARE them to try and enforce this idiocy.


89 posted on 08/07/2010 5:46:13 AM PDT by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

I wonder if I have any friends in WI that I can write to and print something on the envelope that would challenge this insane “law”?


90 posted on 08/07/2010 5:59:39 AM PDT by Shimmer1 (Freedom isn't free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

Okay, the list of officials responsible for what is a state law contains all members of the US House and Senate, and that doesn’t make any sense.

Although I don’t doubt the idiots in the Legislature with Gov Diamond Jim Doyle would slam something like this through in the middle of the night.
****************
The legislature did not vote on this rule or law. The Gov. did not sign it either.

The list should be a list state legislators. However, any congress member (federal or state) is complicit if they have NOT attempted to inform the public about the legislative process of the GAO Board (appointed members) initiating legislation.

Please see post #41

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2566195/posts#41


91 posted on 08/07/2010 6:03:43 AM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Landru; mkjessup; Talisker

Ping


92 posted on 08/07/2010 6:22:55 AM PDT by Dem Guard (The + IRS = Theirs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
Good morning.

Would you be so kind as to re-post this post on Aug 15, 2010 for me?

Do not vote for any liberal/democRAT/socialist politician in the state of WI. Every liberal/democRAT/socialist politician in WI is an asshole.

If and when you WI politicians read this on August 15, send me a FReep mail, and I will give you my address in Florida. Send whomever you like. [Sidebar: I can't guarantee their safety]

5.56mm

93 posted on 08/07/2010 6:37:33 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

[I am not sure how they plan to enforce it - more bureaucrats, perhaps?]

They will only enforce it against those who are making a difference and will use it to threaten and scare everyone else.


94 posted on 08/07/2010 6:43:45 AM PDT by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Little Hitlers, each and every one of them.

THEY deserve to live in the country they strive to create. WE DON’T.

[oops... is that political speech? Who do I need to pay? :-P).


95 posted on 08/07/2010 6:47:07 AM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

I used to think tarring and feathering was a joke until I saw a serious recreation of it on Carnivale. I’ll never joke about tarring and feathering again. It’s the same as joking about torturing someone to death. Not a joking matter.


96 posted on 08/07/2010 6:58:04 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility (The problem isn't that 1% of muslims are terrorists. The problem is 99% of terrorists are muslim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: djf

Already been done.

A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the federal constitution.
Murdock V Pennsylvania, 319 US 105, 1943

Best post in the thread.


97 posted on 08/07/2010 6:58:51 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility (The problem isn't that 1% of muslims are terrorists. The problem is 99% of terrorists are muslim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

What flavor revolution would you like - French or American?


98 posted on 08/07/2010 7:13:10 AM PDT by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality: Marxism is Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf
A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the federal constitution. Murdock V Pennsylvania, 319 US 105, 1943

If so, how could WI even think of passing this law? Did they think they could get away with it?

99 posted on 08/07/2010 7:36:07 AM PDT by raybbr (Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: JrsyJack

Wrong, wrong again. Please - let’s not resond to each other. I have made a point in my life to avoid people such as yourself.


100 posted on 08/07/2010 7:54:42 AM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-189 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson