Posted on 08/04/2010 5:34:10 AM PDT by SJackson
Virginia Governor Robert F. McDonnell's recent proclamation of Confederate History Month provoked a firestorm of criticism, with many accusing him and those who commemorate their Southern ancestors' bravery of ignoring or even defending slavery.
But the cruel and evil institution of slavery was not the sole or even primary reason for the South's secession from the Union, nor was it a significant motivating factor for individual Confederate soldiers.
Yet many of us in the South, including those descended from old Jewish families of the Confederacy, still struggle to expose the truth about why Southern soldiers fought, the courage they showed against overwhelming odds, and the sacrifices they made.
The history of the Confederacy is full of long-forgotten tales of Jewish heroes, warriors, and leaders. This is a story little known today, absent from history books and an embarrassment to liberal Jewish historians ashamed of the prominent role played by Jews in supporting, defending and fighting for the Confederacy. It is a government about which they know little except for its association with slavery.
They find the truth about the war incompatible with their idolization of Abraham Lincoln and his administration - an administration in which anti-Jewish sentiment was rampant, at one point even becoming official government policy and resulting in the worst official act of anti-Semitism in the nation's history.
I know firsthand the ignorance one encounters on this subject because a few years ago I wrote for the Atlanta Journal-Constitution a mild mannered op-ed article discussing why so many good and decent Georgians take pride in their Confederate ancestors.
I explained that we revere our ancestors because, against overwhelming odds, they fought on, often hungry, cold, sick and wounded, to protect their homes and families - not the institution of slavery - from an often cruel invader. Put simply, the heavily outnumbered and undersupplied Confederate soldiers felt they were fighting because an invading army from the North was trying, with great success, to burn their homes, destroy their cities, and kill them.
Advertisement In response, the newspaper published two letters to the editor. One said my statements "were reminiscent of neo-Nazi apologists denying the Holocaust." The other accused me of defending slavery and "a treasonous movement" called the Confederacy.
My then-84-year-old mother asked me to "please wait until I die before you write any more articles."
Slavery was an important political issue before and during the Civil War, especially to the large plantation holders in the South and the abolitionists in the North. But while the war is often portrayed as primarily a fight over slavery, much more important were the issues of preservation of the Union for the North and the over-taxation of the South in the form of exorbitant tariffs.
In the case of Virginia, to cite one example, it is quite clear that the state did not secede over slavery; it stayed in the Union after seven Southern states seceded and formed the Confederacy. It was only after President Lincoln called for 75,000 troops from state militias to attack the South that Virginia, refusing to wage war on its "kinfolk," left the Union.
* * * * *
Let me briefly recount why I take pride in my Confederate ancestors and the brave men who fought with them. One hundred and forty-five years ago, on April 9, 1865, Robert E. Lee surrendered his Army of Northern Virginia to Union Commander Ulysses S. Grant, marking the effective end of the South's struggle for independence.
It was a fateful day for the South, and in particular for my great-grandfather and his four elder brothers, all of whom were fighting for the Confederacy.
While Lee was surrendering at Appomattox, my then-16-year-old great-grandfather, Andrew Jackson Moses, rode out on horseback to defend his hometown of Sumter, South Carolina, along with some 157 other teenagers, invalids, old men, and the wounded from the local hospital. Approaching were 2,500 hardened soldiers from Sherman's army who had just burned nearby Columbia, and it was feared they were headed to Sumter to do the same. Sumter's defenders, outnumbered 15-to-1, managed to hold off Sherman's battle-seasoned veterans for over an hour before being overwhelmed by the vastly superior force.
That same afternoon, the eldest Moses brother, Joshua Lazarus Moses, was killed a few hours after Lee had surrendered (the news having not yet reached the front). Josh was commanding an artillery battalion that fired the last shots in defense of Mobile before being overrun by a Union force outnumbering his 13 to 1. In this battle of Fort Blakeley, one of his brothers, Horace, was captured, and another, Perry, was wounded.
Josh Moses was one of more than 3,000 Jews who fought for the South and the last Confederate Jew to fall in battle.
* * * * *
More than two-dozen members of the extended Moses family fought in the war, and at least nine gave their lives for what Southerners came to refer to as the Lost Cause. The best known of the Moses family Confederates was Major Raphael Moses, a fifth-generation South Carolinian who in 1849 moved to Columbus, Georgia, where he was a lawyer and planter. Moses, whose three sons also fought for the South, ended up attending the last meeting and carrying out the last order of the Confederate government - delivering the last of the Confederate treasury, $40,000 in gold and silver bullion, to help feed and supply defeated Confederate soldiers in the Augusta hospital or straggling home after the war.
Major Moses named one of his sons Albert Luria because he wanted to preserve the family name of an ancestor who reputedly was the court physician to Spain's Queen Isabella. Luria was called to duty in Columbus, five miles from home, on Saturday, April 20, 1861. After marching from the armory to the depot, Albert writes, "we were met by an immense concourse of citizens - assembled to bid us 'God Speed.' "
Among the crowd were several members of his family whom Albert was surprised to see. Being observant Jews, they would not ride or work their horses on the Sabbath, and so they had walked several miles into town to say farewell.
Luria, Josh Moses's first cousin, was the first Confederate Jew to be killed, mortally wounded at age 19 during the Battle of Seven Pines (Fair Oaks) in Virginia on May 31, 1862. He died after courageously throwing a live Union artillery shell out of his fortification before it exploded, thereby saving the lives of many of his men.
Luria's brother Israel Moses Nunez, a veteran of many battles, was named after his ancestor Dr. Samuel Nunez (sometimes written Nunes), who arrived in Savannah, Georgia, in July 1733, in a boat from England with 42 Portuguese Jews fleeing persecution. Dr. Nunez is credited with saving the newly established mosquito-infested colony from being wiped out by what was thought to be yellow fever but which was probably malaria.
Another leading Jewish figure of the war was the Moses brothers' mother - my great-great-grandmother - Octavia, a legend within the family and in Sumter.
She was from one of the country's most prominent Jewish families, her father being the well-known Jewish author and playwright Isaac Harby, one of the leading Jewish figures in 19th century America. There was a tradition among members of the family that their name came from a courageous Jewish soldier who fought in defense of Jerusalem against the Romans and who took the name of Hereb (sword), or more likely Ish Hereb (swordsman).
Isaac Harby was proud of the role played in the American Revolution by his father-in-law, Samuel Mordecai, "a brave grenadier in the regular American Army, who fought and bled for the liberty he lived to enjoy and to hand down to his children."
Harby was a leading member of the Kahal Kadosh Beth Elo[k]im synagogue, first organized in Charleston in 1749 and thought to be the oldest synagogue in continuous use in the United States. A Jewish Tourist's Guide to the U.S. notes that "So many Charleston Jews enlisted in the service of the Confederacy that from 1862 to 1866, Beth Elo[k]im found it impossible to obtain a quorum of trustees and could hold no regular meetings."
Octavia Harby and her husband, Andrew Jackson Moses, had 17 children (three died in infancy), the five eldest males of whom fought for the South. Octavia was very active on the home front in support of the Confederacy. As she put it,
When the War broke out like every other Southern woman, I immediately began work for the soldiers: I organized a sewing society, to cut and make garments for them. I made it a point to try and meet every train that brought soldiers through our town, and, with others, frequently walked from my home, sometimes at two o'clock in the morning, to take food to our men as they passed through. We always greeted them with the wildest enthusiasm, and no thought of defeat ever entered our minds . Whenever the boys were fortunate enough to get home on short furloughs, they were the guests of the town - everybody feted them and nothing was too much to do in their honor.
When hospitals were established in Sumter, Octavia writes, "Our ladies, of course, took immediate charge, and the soldiers were fed and nursed with all the means of our command, and all the tenderness of Southern women."
She also showed compassion for the Union troops who had been taken prisoner: "When I heard that the Northern prisoners would be brought through our town and that they were nearly in a starving condition, I immediately exerted myself to obtain a large quantity of provisions to give to them."
Throughout the South, Jews assumed prominent roles in the Confederate government and armed forces; as Robert Rosen puts it in his authoritative book The Jewish Confederates, they "were used to being treated as equals" (an acceptance they had enjoyed for a century and a half).
The Confederacy's secretary of war and later state was Judah P. Benjamin - the so-called brains of the Confederacy - and the top Confederate commander, General Robert E. Lee, was known for showing great respect to his Jewish soldiers.
Charleston in the early 1800s had more Jews than any other city in North America, and many were respected citizens, office holders, and successful entrepreneurs. The city was commonly referred to as "our Jerusalem," and Myer Moses, my maternal family patriarch, in 1806 called his hometown " this land of milk and honey."
Many Jewish Confederates carried with them to the front the famous soldiers' prayer (which began with the sacred Shema) written by Richmond Rabbi Max Michelbacher, who after secession had issued a widely published benediction comparing Southerners to "the Children of Israel crossing the Red Sea."
* * * * *
In contrast to the South, the North was a hotbed of anti-Jewish bigotry. Much of the political and military leadership of the Union government was composed of men - including such leading figures as generals Ulysses S. Grant, William Tecumseh Sherman and Benjamin ("Beast") Butler - who disliked Jews, openly expressed their feelings, and persecuted Jews when they had the occasion to do so. The prevailing anti-Jewish attitude resulted in the Union army's committing the worst official act of anti-Semitism in American history - about which I wrote in greater detail for The Jewish Press in "Shame of the Yankees - America's Worst Anti-Jewish Action" (front-page essay, Nov. 17, 2006).
On December 17, 1862, Grant issued his soon-to-be infamous "General Order #11," expelling all Jews "as a class" from his conquered territories within 24 hours.
As a result of Grant's expulsion order, Jewish families were forced out of their homes in Paducah, Kentucky and Holly Springs and Oxford, Mississippi, and several were sent to prison.
On January 4, 1863, President Lincoln had Grant's order rescinded, but by then Jewish families in the area had been expelled, humiliated, terrified, jailed, and in some cases stripped of their possessions.
Bertram W. Korn, in his classic work American Jewry and the Civil War, describes the hardships and persecution suffered by Jewish families subject to the expulsion order:
They still tell stories of the expulsion in Paducah of the hurried departure by riverboat up the Ohio to Cincinnati; of a baby almost left behind in the haste and confusion and tossed bodily into the boat; of two dying women permitted to remain behind in neighbors' care. Thirty men and their families were expelled from Paducah, and according to affidavits by some of "the most respectable Union citizens of the city," the deportees "had at no time been engaged in trade within the active lines of General Grant " Two had already served brief enlistments in the Union army.
There are numerous other documented examples of widespread anti-Semitism in the North (recounted in my aforementioned "Shame of the Yankees" article, which can be accessed on The Jewish Press website). But you will find nary a mention of this persecution in history books, only adulatory praise for the Union and Lincoln.
The Union army that killed my family members was hardly the forerunner of the Civil Rights movement. Indeed, the treatment of Jews by Union forces pales in comparison to other atrocities they regularly committed against civilians, including the destruction of agricultural areas and other non-military targets; the routine burning and looting of cities, homes, libraries and courthouses; and, worst of all, the mass murder of Native Americans in the so-called Indian Wars.
This was the Union Army that descended upon the South and that my ancestors fought heroically in defense of their lives, their families, and their nation. It was a Lost Cause but an honorable one, and it should not be forgotten.
I will always stand by and defend my fellow Southerners also (Jews included, oy vey!).
All this moral relativism by liberal northerners makes me ill. If you guys hate the South so much, don't come here. Problem solved.
We do not need your moral and cultural pollution anyway.
I just got burned by friendly fire, you have me mistaken for Yankee scum. I assure you that I am on you side.
It depends on whether you want them to behave as a conquered nation with generations of resentment or as an ally and equal partner. I MUCH prefer the later.
Do you really think the union would NOT have not the war without the depravities which characterized Sherman's march?
And, by the way, I think Lincoln was one of our greatest presidents. I would rank only Washington, Jefferson and possibly Ronald Reagan ahead of him.
But I also think his two greatest mistakes were:
I would too, but it's a faulty premise. There would never be two self-sustaining nations. The south simply could not stand on its own. It lacked the infrastructure and the resolve to build the infrastructure necessary to provide for itself.
Besides - how much faith can one have in a confederacy built on the notion that when the times get rough the rough get going? If you base your culture on secession, why wouldn't you expect secession to be a permanency in your life?
Glad to see you calling it what it was, lest there be confusion about things.
I read his post and could not help but wonder if he is just stupid. I mean, his link supports the original article.
At the very least, the boy ain’t too bright.
And they know that the masses of american sheeple are awaking up (albeit too slowly for my taste) and are attempting to flood us with medical marijuana, shock TV, "green energy", the undocumented and "international law.
It feeling more like 1859 or 1935 than 2010 with each passing day. Look for the collapse of the dollar next year when or as a result of the new coming oil price shock. When the dollar is worth less than a dime and the truckers will no longer bring food to the cities, that is when the shooting will commence.
From your link:
And Grant himself did not mention Order No. 11 in his Memoirs. He deliberately omitted it, his son explained in a 1907 letter, because “that was a matter long past and best not referred to.”
LMAO! Memoirs ARE about “matters long past”. Don’t know about Grant, but his son was a moron.
“Also uttered by WT Sherman. The Human Torch.”
I’m not defending the man. I don’t know enough about the American Civil War. It was mentioned in Israel on about 1 page of a world history book. There was a picture of a Gatlin Gun.
All I remember is thinking the Gatlin Gun was really, really, cool.
I am merely commenting on the tactical efficacy of a scorched Earth strategy.
While you are correct that at the big-picture/political/money level, slavery was the issue...where Southerners get confused is at the individual soldier level. Lee for example, was against slavery, and freed all of his slaves before the war began...(contra Grant), however he strongly believed in states’ rights, so too, the majority of the soldiers who fought for the South were too poor to own slaves—hence they each had their own personal motivations for fighting, some noble, some not.
I find that the whole North/South debate on whether slavery or other issues were the cause of the conflict boils down to big-picture/political/money issues (of which slavery was it for the South...) verses individuals’ personal motivations for fighting (often simply “because the Yankees are coming...”) which really is an apples to oranges comparison.
Another complication is why did the NORTH go to war? It wasn’t to free slaves, as Lincoln had repeatedly said he would keep them enslaved IF IT WOULD PRESERVE THE UNION. So Northern motives at the big-picture/political/money were not all about freedom and idealism (as their descendants like to think) but rather were primarily just to preserve the union...for all kinds big-picture/political/money reasons.
As to individual Northern soldiers motivations? Of course some were fighting for freedom...some weren’t, there were all kinds of reasons for being there. But at the big-picture/political/money level, Lincoln and the North only pushed emancipation mid-war, when they saw they were losing...and they knew this new moral crusade would rejuvenate motivations.
As a Southerner, what convinced me that at the big-picture/political/money the reason the South separated was due to slavery, is the record of the various state-legislatures debates on secession. In every one, the debate centered around preserving slavery—which of course was a keystone in their economy at the time....so if you follow the money trail the truth comes out. Of course state legislatures’ votes, and individual soldiers’ motivations are two different things.
So too, follow the money trail in the North...and loss of union was bad news for Northern money...hence preserving the union was the highest priority, NOT freeing slaves. Noble motivations for abolition amidst certain soldiers...sure, but, so what?
This argument does not seem to apply very well to Japan and Germany, whose cities we burned without thinking about dallying on our way to unconditional surrender. The waring parties succede best post bellum when the victory is clear.
I'm sure that if Sherman was quoted saying, "The weather's nice today," you'd find a way to conceive that as a sinister statement of utter evil.
“You have been deluded by your upbringing which portrays slavery as the worst of all human conditions and uses it then as a justification for the destruction visited upon the southern States.”
It’s pretty darn close to the worse. The only difference between this and genocide is that at least those folks are dead right then, instead of having no stake in your own existence. To be bought a sold at some A-hole’s pleasure and profit.
Too bad the south allowed themselves to be lorded over by a power elite that moved events along to protect their little lifestyle. Maybe the whole affair could have been avoided.
An easy question: to enforce “justice, fairness, and the liberal way.”
Lee had mixed views on slavery, regarding that Peculiar Institution as a necessary evil and "the white mans burden". He did manumit his slaves but evidence suggests that it was more a matter of practical necessity rather than ideological bent.
U.S. Grant owned no slaves. Well that's not entirely true. He did purchase one slave from his FIL so that he could manumit him.
"I just got burned by friendly fire, you have me mistaken for Yankee scum. I assure you that I am on you side."I know that you're "my people". My ire is directed at the ignorant and hateful northerners on this thread, and in the world overall. It's as if they were raised with anti-Southern propaganda, and never made the effort to cure themselves of their ignorance as adults.
I hope you will accept my apology, FRIend.
No, that was Sheridan.
Powerfully clueless statement.
ML/NJ
"As to individual Northern soldiers motivations? Of course some were fighting for freedom...some weren’t, there were all kinds of reasons for being there"Wasn't there a draft in effect part way through the war?
It is a rare day that I agree with you, but this is it. Slavery was the primary, irreconsilable issue. Tariffs roads... were secondary. The proof, slave holding Whigs supported secession just like slaveholding Democrats.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.