Posted on 07/23/2010 3:37:45 PM PDT by ex-Texan
Retraining can’t keep up with flood of jobs lost overseas?
Those who preach the gospel of free trade say it will lift the whole world’s economy, from rich nations to poor.
And, they say, if American workers lose jobs to workers overseas or cheap imports, they can get retraining — courtesy of the federal Trade Act — to learn higher-skilled jobs for the 21st Century.
Forty-year-old Daryl Payne lost a production technician job at Daimler Trucks on Swan Island when the German company shifted manufacturing to Mexico. Uncle Sam is now paying him to learn how to be a water-treatment technician.
Lake Oswego resident Mitch Besser, 48, lost his job as a software engineer for a Nevada casino company when it shifted operations to Beijing. Now, he hopes the government retraining program will pay him to study bioinformatics at Oregon Health & Science University.
Trade Act benefits are a lifeline for displaced workers at a time when replacement jobs are scarce.
“The economy is going to be turning around eventually,” says Bob Tackett, executive secretary-treasurer of the Northwest Labor Council in Portland. “This is a good time to train yourself up.”
But even supporters of the program say it’s not enough to offset the jobs being lost as Oregon’s manufacturing and high-tech base is dismantled due to free-trade pacts.
“This is just a Band-Aid on a large wound,” Tackett says.
In the past year, the U.S. Labor Department certified 10,902 Oregon workers as eligible for retraining and other Trade Adjustment Assistance because they lost jobs due to free-trade pacts, according to data compiled by the Oregon Fair Trade Campaign. The campaign’s director, Arthur Stamoulis, says those lost jobs are evidence that unfair trade policies, not just a sour economy, are partly to blame for Oregon’s stubbornly high unemployment.
If the sole reason for Oregon’s huge job losses is the recession, says Greg Pallesen, vice president of Portland-based Association of Western Pulp and Paper Workers, then why is China booming right now?
In some ways, Pallesen says, the Trade Act was designed to mollify Congressional and citizen fears that free-trade policies would sacrifice too many American jobs. “It sounds terrible, but I almost believe this country would have been better off if the Trade Act had never passed.”
Benefits expanded
The Trade Act of 1974 was designed to help retrain blue-collar manufacturing workers displaced by competition from cheap imports. The program was expanded in 2002 — timed with the new North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA — to aid workers whose jobs were shipped overseas. The program was expanded again last year to include white-collar and service workers.
“It’s a great program,” Daryl Payne says. Workers can get extended unemployment benefits, health insurance subsidies and two years’ tuition for retraining if the Oregon Employment Department finds there are available jobs in the worker’s chosen new field.
But now, even stalwart Portland-area employers such as Tektronix, the granddaddy of the local technology sector, are shipping jobs overseas. That raises a troubling question for area workers and young adults pondering their future education: Just what is a secure job to shoot for these days? There’ll always be toilets
As Payne notes, even X-rays are being sent to India so lower-paid X-ray technicians can interpret them.
But he figures you can’t offshore toilets, and local workers always will be needed in the water treatment field. So he enrolled in a two-year program at Clackamas Community College in Oregon City to learn a new trade.
Payne worked 15 years for Daimler as a production technician and doing quality assurance on the truck assembly line. He was laid off in early 2009, and got temporary work counseling fellow laid-off workers about Trade Act benefits.
Of 180 workers laid off in his group, only 85 signed up for any Trade Act benefits, Payne says. Of those, at least 40 sought retraining benefits, though some left their studies when Daimler called them back to their jobs. Program’s limits
Many displaced workers don’t even bother to come to orientation meetings to learn about Trade Act benefits. “They’re mad at the world,” says Mark Warne, who helps link workers to the program as a work force liaison for the Oregon AFL-CIO labor federation in Portland.
Some workers can’t afford to live on unemployment insurance while going back to school, even if the government pays their tuition and 80 percent of health insurance benefits. That’s not enough to make house payments and pay children’s college tuition, especially if their spouse isn’t working, Warne says.
“A lot of them are intimidated about going back to school,” especially older workers, Pallesen says.
Some Daimler workers were tripped up by federal and health insurance paperwork issues, Payne says, and were denied benefits.
And the federal government is sometimes slow to certify that laid-off workers lost their jobs due to trade pacts. It took 18 months for workers at Weyerhaeuser’s Albany trucking division to qualify for benefits, Warne says. By then, many had moved on.
Some companies resist filing for Trade Act benefits for their laid-off workers. “A lot of companies don’t want anything to do with it,” says Tackett, who previously had Warne’s job. Unions or a minimum of three workers at an affected work site can file for benefits, but it takes longer without the employer’s cooperation.
Payne figures he’ll make out better than most of his peers. He couldn’t handle going to college while he was working full time, but now has time to focus on his studies.
He’s noticing that three or four job openings crop up each month in his intended new field. Though there are 50 to 80 applicants for each job, he’s confident about his prospects.
No job is safe
Mitch Besser, 48, who lives with his wife in Lake Oswego, has a master’s degree in software design and engineering, but still was out of work for two years. So in 2008, he secured a weekday apartment in Corvallis to take a job there with Reno-based International Gaming Technology, doing computer networking for slot machines. Besser earned $90,000, but knew it was short-lived when the company brought in workers from China to be trained on how to do his job.
He was laid off in late-June and the operation was shifted to Beijing, where, he notes, casino gambling is illegal.
The typical argument of free-trade boosters, Besser says, is that the U.S. can afford to lose lower-skilled jobs overseas and focus on higher-skilled work here.
“I think it’s a complete lie,” he says. “Anyone’s job can be moved.”
A 2007 academic paper by Princeton economist Alan Blinder found that many jobs requiring college education are the most vulnerable to being shipped overseas in future years. Among his list of “highly offshorable” jobs are mathematicians, film and video editors, economists and authors.
As Besser weighs possible training opportunities, he doesn’t think technology jobs are a safe bet any more.
“I have thought about other fields that are less likely to be outsourced,” he says. “I have no idea how to avoid that, honestly.”
Living on the edge
Sergio Menor, 48, couldn’t find work for six months after he was laid off from Daimler last fall. So he enrolled in a two-year renewable energy program at Portland Community College.
The Trade Act helps, Menor says, but it’s still tough paying the bills. His wife has work as a medical insurance technician in Portland, but they own a home in Clackamas and have two young sons to support. His wife cashed in her 401(k), and the couple has run up big credit card debts.
“Sometimes we miss our payments for the house, and the utility bills,” Menor says.
When he’s done with the two-year program, he thinks the only company hiring is Vestas, a Danish wind-energy company with regional headquarters in Portland.
Menor immigrated here from the Philippines in 1993 to get a better life. Now, it seems, many local jobs are going back to Asia. Upside of free trade
Portland economist Joe Cortright and others point out that free-trade pacts are a boon for local employers competing well internationally, including the state’s largest locally based company, Nike, and Oregon’s largest private employer, Intel.
Consumers and businesses also enjoy cheaper prices on a host of imported goods.
“Oregon is a major exporter, being on the coast and near growing Asian markets. We gain from that,” says Nick Beleiciks, state employment economist for the Oregon Employment Department. Some of the same companies that lost jobs due to free-trade pacts might gain jobs in other units, he notes.
However, it’s not clear if Oregon has gained more jobs than it has lost due to trade pacts, Beleiciks says. The big fear when the U.S. endorsed NAFTA and other free-trade agreements was the loss of manufacturing jobs, and that has occurred, he says.
When the Great Recession gripped Oregon in July 2008, the state had 143,100 manufacturing jobs in durable goods — a category that includes trucks, other transportation, computers, computer components, metals, electronic instruments and wood products. Two years later, those jobs are down to 113,500, a drop of 29,600.
Since last October, 2,979 Oregonians filed to get new Trade Act benefits, including 696 from Portland’s tri-county-area, says David Allen, Trade Act program analyst for the Oregon Employment Department, which administers the benefits.
Usually only about half the Oregon workers displaced by trade policies seek some form of Trade Adjustment Assistance, such as extended unemployment insurance, Allen says. Among those, roughly 30 percent enroll in retraining programs, he estimates. That translates into one in seven affected workers.
A 2006 federal study found that most workers who do take retraining benefits get lower pay in their new jobs. Oregon workers using Trade Act benefits in fiscal year 2007-08 earned the equivalent of $31,000 average salaries after leaving the program, according to the Department of Labor. Denied benefits
Southeast Portland resident Steve Keller, 44, would love to get those training benefits, to become a heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) technician. He lost his job last year at Innovion Corp., a Gresham chip plant. But the Labor Department denied a petition to rule the layoffs were due to trade policies, Keller says. He’s puzzled by that, since workers at the company’s sister plant in Arizona did get Trade Act benefits when their plant closed for similar reasons.
So now Keller is job hunting like crazy, and can’t afford to get retrained. He’s unsure what jobs to pursue, and which ones are safe from being sent overseas.
“I think about it every day,” Keller says. “I don’t have a clue.”
Are there any statistics out on the interwebs that chart average wages vs. years?
Sure, I can see it.
What is a medical insurance technician?
>“It sounds terrible, but I almost believe this country would
>have been better off if the Trade Act had never passed.”
Actually, it doesn’t sound that terrible...and yes, we would have been better off.
To help their exports. I’m anti ‘free trade’ btw, so you’re either preaching to the chior or I dunno.
BLS has something, I’m sure . . . but it will only confirm what you know: real wages rise during expansions, and fall during contractions.
You have learned nothing during the last four years of economic shyte.
Like I mentioned, some people think this means that prosperity is right around the corner.
And you’ve learned nothing over the past few decades . . . small wonder you have to wait for a recession to crawl out from under your rock.
All I’ve seen is bubble economies and deep recessions since we started this stuff. If today’s environment is the result of this free trade, then you can have it.
Free trade under those circumstances is nothing less than suicide.
•AustraliaI'd like to see some actual data on whether any of them have no environmental or safety laws, and whatnot.
•Bahrain
•Canada
•Chile
•Costa Rica
•Dominican Republic
•El Salvador
•Guatemala
•Honduras
•Israel
•Jordan
•Mexico
•Morocco
•Nicaragua
•Oman
•Peru
•Singapore
“Tariffs mean a larger more powerful American middle class involved in manufacturing, engineering and design plus all the businesses that support manufacturing such as accountants”
How so. Who gets the money collected from tariffs? The government does.
Protecting jobs by imposing a penalty on goods imported from a foreign country is equivalent to protecting jobs by allowing unions to decide how much work they do and how much they get paid for it. It benefits those chosen few that keep jobs at the expense of higher cost and lower quality of the products.
Tariff money goes to the government to dole out as they see fit, giving them more control over our lives than they already do. Every dime in the hands of government is a dollar drain on the resources of capital that could otherwise be put to work improving the economic condition instead of regulating it.
Tariffs make imported goods cost more. They do not make our products better, or help us sell our products to foreign markets.
Yes, if they were truly patriotic, they'd keep their wages sky-high, far above the global-market level, so American companies are totally uncompetitive and can go out of business (unless we invade the world and hold guns to peoples' heads and force them to buy American).
Komrade, you are so right...we can ignore the invisible hand and centrally plan the economy of the world!
</sarc>
I am all for free trade if it were fair trade. NOT THE SAME THING. We make treaties to help corporations turn a profit without protecting the national viability of a nation. Other countries have been playing us for suckers for years. We have created a new kind of slave labor in the international market. Simply because foreign workers work for cheaper wages in squalid conditions does not make them equal labor to ours. We simply cannot compete against nations that abuse their working class have lax or no regulations at all etc.. However, we should have seen this coming, this is the nature of capital. It will go where it can gain the highest profit. In the long run capitalists cut their own throats and we are transferring technology to nations that will use it against us to destroy and conquer us.
It’s funny that one of the planks of libertarianism was to have only tariffs as the income for the government. Yet it’s also a way to control us all? Weird.
Well, off to the mud huts I guess then. If we’re unable to compete, I suppose that’s where we’re headed.
Why do all those other nations impose such restrictions on us, and enjoy huge trade surpluses though. Seems odd that they benefit if the idea is so horrible.
</nutcase>
Wrong. The Founders saw tariffs as the method to raise revenue, not engage in selective industrial policy (exceptions excepted). Your failure to see that explains why you don’t understand the “control” aspect.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
