Posted on 07/23/2010 3:37:45 PM PDT by ex-Texan
Retraining can’t keep up with flood of jobs lost overseas?
Those who preach the gospel of free trade say it will lift the whole world’s economy, from rich nations to poor.
And, they say, if American workers lose jobs to workers overseas or cheap imports, they can get retraining — courtesy of the federal Trade Act — to learn higher-skilled jobs for the 21st Century.
Forty-year-old Daryl Payne lost a production technician job at Daimler Trucks on Swan Island when the German company shifted manufacturing to Mexico. Uncle Sam is now paying him to learn how to be a water-treatment technician.
Lake Oswego resident Mitch Besser, 48, lost his job as a software engineer for a Nevada casino company when it shifted operations to Beijing. Now, he hopes the government retraining program will pay him to study bioinformatics at Oregon Health & Science University.
Trade Act benefits are a lifeline for displaced workers at a time when replacement jobs are scarce.
“The economy is going to be turning around eventually,” says Bob Tackett, executive secretary-treasurer of the Northwest Labor Council in Portland. “This is a good time to train yourself up.”
But even supporters of the program say it’s not enough to offset the jobs being lost as Oregon’s manufacturing and high-tech base is dismantled due to free-trade pacts.
“This is just a Band-Aid on a large wound,” Tackett says.
In the past year, the U.S. Labor Department certified 10,902 Oregon workers as eligible for retraining and other Trade Adjustment Assistance because they lost jobs due to free-trade pacts, according to data compiled by the Oregon Fair Trade Campaign. The campaign’s director, Arthur Stamoulis, says those lost jobs are evidence that unfair trade policies, not just a sour economy, are partly to blame for Oregon’s stubbornly high unemployment.
If the sole reason for Oregon’s huge job losses is the recession, says Greg Pallesen, vice president of Portland-based Association of Western Pulp and Paper Workers, then why is China booming right now?
In some ways, Pallesen says, the Trade Act was designed to mollify Congressional and citizen fears that free-trade policies would sacrifice too many American jobs. “It sounds terrible, but I almost believe this country would have been better off if the Trade Act had never passed.”
Benefits expanded
The Trade Act of 1974 was designed to help retrain blue-collar manufacturing workers displaced by competition from cheap imports. The program was expanded in 2002 — timed with the new North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA — to aid workers whose jobs were shipped overseas. The program was expanded again last year to include white-collar and service workers.
“It’s a great program,” Daryl Payne says. Workers can get extended unemployment benefits, health insurance subsidies and two years’ tuition for retraining if the Oregon Employment Department finds there are available jobs in the worker’s chosen new field.
But now, even stalwart Portland-area employers such as Tektronix, the granddaddy of the local technology sector, are shipping jobs overseas. That raises a troubling question for area workers and young adults pondering their future education: Just what is a secure job to shoot for these days? There’ll always be toilets
As Payne notes, even X-rays are being sent to India so lower-paid X-ray technicians can interpret them.
But he figures you can’t offshore toilets, and local workers always will be needed in the water treatment field. So he enrolled in a two-year program at Clackamas Community College in Oregon City to learn a new trade.
Payne worked 15 years for Daimler as a production technician and doing quality assurance on the truck assembly line. He was laid off in early 2009, and got temporary work counseling fellow laid-off workers about Trade Act benefits.
Of 180 workers laid off in his group, only 85 signed up for any Trade Act benefits, Payne says. Of those, at least 40 sought retraining benefits, though some left their studies when Daimler called them back to their jobs. Program’s limits
Many displaced workers don’t even bother to come to orientation meetings to learn about Trade Act benefits. “They’re mad at the world,” says Mark Warne, who helps link workers to the program as a work force liaison for the Oregon AFL-CIO labor federation in Portland.
Some workers can’t afford to live on unemployment insurance while going back to school, even if the government pays their tuition and 80 percent of health insurance benefits. That’s not enough to make house payments and pay children’s college tuition, especially if their spouse isn’t working, Warne says.
“A lot of them are intimidated about going back to school,” especially older workers, Pallesen says.
Some Daimler workers were tripped up by federal and health insurance paperwork issues, Payne says, and were denied benefits.
And the federal government is sometimes slow to certify that laid-off workers lost their jobs due to trade pacts. It took 18 months for workers at Weyerhaeuser’s Albany trucking division to qualify for benefits, Warne says. By then, many had moved on.
Some companies resist filing for Trade Act benefits for their laid-off workers. “A lot of companies don’t want anything to do with it,” says Tackett, who previously had Warne’s job. Unions or a minimum of three workers at an affected work site can file for benefits, but it takes longer without the employer’s cooperation.
Payne figures he’ll make out better than most of his peers. He couldn’t handle going to college while he was working full time, but now has time to focus on his studies.
He’s noticing that three or four job openings crop up each month in his intended new field. Though there are 50 to 80 applicants for each job, he’s confident about his prospects.
No job is safe
Mitch Besser, 48, who lives with his wife in Lake Oswego, has a master’s degree in software design and engineering, but still was out of work for two years. So in 2008, he secured a weekday apartment in Corvallis to take a job there with Reno-based International Gaming Technology, doing computer networking for slot machines. Besser earned $90,000, but knew it was short-lived when the company brought in workers from China to be trained on how to do his job.
He was laid off in late-June and the operation was shifted to Beijing, where, he notes, casino gambling is illegal.
The typical argument of free-trade boosters, Besser says, is that the U.S. can afford to lose lower-skilled jobs overseas and focus on higher-skilled work here.
“I think it’s a complete lie,” he says. “Anyone’s job can be moved.”
A 2007 academic paper by Princeton economist Alan Blinder found that many jobs requiring college education are the most vulnerable to being shipped overseas in future years. Among his list of “highly offshorable” jobs are mathematicians, film and video editors, economists and authors.
As Besser weighs possible training opportunities, he doesn’t think technology jobs are a safe bet any more.
“I have thought about other fields that are less likely to be outsourced,” he says. “I have no idea how to avoid that, honestly.”
Living on the edge
Sergio Menor, 48, couldn’t find work for six months after he was laid off from Daimler last fall. So he enrolled in a two-year renewable energy program at Portland Community College.
The Trade Act helps, Menor says, but it’s still tough paying the bills. His wife has work as a medical insurance technician in Portland, but they own a home in Clackamas and have two young sons to support. His wife cashed in her 401(k), and the couple has run up big credit card debts.
“Sometimes we miss our payments for the house, and the utility bills,” Menor says.
When he’s done with the two-year program, he thinks the only company hiring is Vestas, a Danish wind-energy company with regional headquarters in Portland.
Menor immigrated here from the Philippines in 1993 to get a better life. Now, it seems, many local jobs are going back to Asia. Upside of free trade
Portland economist Joe Cortright and others point out that free-trade pacts are a boon for local employers competing well internationally, including the state’s largest locally based company, Nike, and Oregon’s largest private employer, Intel.
Consumers and businesses also enjoy cheaper prices on a host of imported goods.
“Oregon is a major exporter, being on the coast and near growing Asian markets. We gain from that,” says Nick Beleiciks, state employment economist for the Oregon Employment Department. Some of the same companies that lost jobs due to free-trade pacts might gain jobs in other units, he notes.
However, it’s not clear if Oregon has gained more jobs than it has lost due to trade pacts, Beleiciks says. The big fear when the U.S. endorsed NAFTA and other free-trade agreements was the loss of manufacturing jobs, and that has occurred, he says.
When the Great Recession gripped Oregon in July 2008, the state had 143,100 manufacturing jobs in durable goods — a category that includes trucks, other transportation, computers, computer components, metals, electronic instruments and wood products. Two years later, those jobs are down to 113,500, a drop of 29,600.
Since last October, 2,979 Oregonians filed to get new Trade Act benefits, including 696 from Portland’s tri-county-area, says David Allen, Trade Act program analyst for the Oregon Employment Department, which administers the benefits.
Usually only about half the Oregon workers displaced by trade policies seek some form of Trade Adjustment Assistance, such as extended unemployment insurance, Allen says. Among those, roughly 30 percent enroll in retraining programs, he estimates. That translates into one in seven affected workers.
A 2006 federal study found that most workers who do take retraining benefits get lower pay in their new jobs. Oregon workers using Trade Act benefits in fiscal year 2007-08 earned the equivalent of $31,000 average salaries after leaving the program, according to the Department of Labor. Denied benefits
Southeast Portland resident Steve Keller, 44, would love to get those training benefits, to become a heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) technician. He lost his job last year at Innovion Corp., a Gresham chip plant. But the Labor Department denied a petition to rule the layoffs were due to trade policies, Keller says. He’s puzzled by that, since workers at the company’s sister plant in Arizona did get Trade Act benefits when their plant closed for similar reasons.
So now Keller is job hunting like crazy, and can’t afford to get retrained. He’s unsure what jobs to pursue, and which ones are safe from being sent overseas.
“I think about it every day,” Keller says. “I don’t have a clue.”
*Ping* !
That’s right, send them all to the Gulag . . . eh, comrade?
Conservatives tend to hate the idea that companies can be traitorous, but all the outsourcing and so on just flat out is. Sure it’s good for the short term, but they’re killing the golden goose. Frankly, they’ve already killed, roasted, and ate it.
That seems to be the way it's working out.
Sometimes it is a zero sum game, sadly. The tide’s lifting the but the US is weighed down by lousy government and businesses.
No it was helped a lot by idiots who watch TV. TV, hollywood and the lib newsmedia put the marxist in power. Idiots still watching ball games where the NFL, NCAA, MBL, NBA and ESPEN endlessly fawn over him. I cancelled TV over a year ago.
Fox/Saudia - partially owned by the Saudis.
I’m not sure if it’s so clear cut.
If the choice is between keeping manufacturing jobs in the US with union employees, government environmental restrictions, and going out of business,
or moving manufacturing jobs abroad so you continue to employee American management, office workers, sales representatives, truck drivers, and give payments to your retiree American stock holders, option B is a bit better.
As a result of the decision to discontinue the Sterling brand, the St. Thomas, Ontario, plant will cease truck manufacturing operations in March 2009, concurrent with the expiration of the existing agreement with the Canadian Auto Workers members employed there. The plant manufactures Sterling medium- and heavy-duty trucks.Funny, no word on those evil Carolinians for stealing Oregon's jobs (not that I saw).DTNA will also close the Portland, Oregon, truck manufacturing plant in June 2010, when current labor contracts expire. Western Star commercial production will be assigned to the company’s Santiago, Mexico plant, while production of Freightliner-branded military vehicles will take place at one of the company’s manufacturing facilities in the Carolinas by mid-year 2010. A migrating supplier base and high logistics costs have had a major impact on the cost of production in this location.
press release, October 14, 2008.
dittos — Free trade NAFTA WTO has always been a scam where the elites make billions and US workers lose jobs. All those jobs sent to Asia would come in handy right now
I would have put up a tariff wall years ago
Free trade under those circumstances is nothing less than suicide.
Free trade under those circumstances is nothing less than suicide.
Not to worry...We are a superpower when it comes to lawyers. More lawyers and less manufacturing.
Your friends in the U.S. Congress are working on it:
Mexico's decision to impose tariffs on dozens of U.S. products could cost Oregon exporters tens of millions of dollars.Last one standing wins, isn't that what the retards say?
It’s pretty obvious that the business and government elites consider tariffs as the ultimate no-go. Why? It would produce more jobs here and cost them an arm and a leg. Result? Dead middle class.
That story is about Mexico imposing tariffs for their own benefit it seems. Kinda proves the point, doesn’t it?
The converse is true
Tariffs mean a larger more powerful American middle class involved in manufacturing, engineering and design plus all the businesses that support manufacturing such as accountants. And less powerful elites and fewer billionaires. These tariffs should have been put in 20 years ago. I was reading books on this 23 years. But greed, dishonor and laziness won out. Let the Asian slaves make it for us cheaper was/is the attitude
I don’t know about that.
Business was lost because workers were too greedy. Think Unions and union wages.
Business was lost because the government was too greedy. All the regulations and “law like rules” handed out and used to harass business.
Business was lost to the environmentalist progressives over the past few decades.
Business was lost to overseas...because elements in our culture made and forced business to choose friendlier places to do business.
Business didn’t go to Galt’s Gulch, but they went Galt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
