Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why we must reduce military spending (Barney Frank & Ron Paul)
The Hill's Congress Blog ^ | 7/06/2010 | Barney Frank & Ron Paul

Posted on 07/08/2010 11:14:39 AM PDT by Sic Parvis Magna

As members of opposing political parties, we disagree on a number of important issues. But we must not allow honest disagreement over some issues interfere with our ability to work together when we do agree.

By far the single most important of these is our current initiative to include substantial reductions in the projected level of American military spending as part of future deficit reduction efforts. For decades, the subject of military expenditures has been glaringly absent from public debate. Yet the Pentagon budget for 2010 is $693 billion — more than all other discretionary spending programs combined. Even subtracting the cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, military spending still amounts to over 42% of total spending.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: bedfellows; birdsofafeather; military; ronpaul; strangebedfellows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
There is also an article on this topic at Foreign Policy: "Life by a Thousand Cuts".
1 posted on 07/08/2010 11:14:46 AM PDT by Sic Parvis Magna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sic Parvis Magna

Ron Paul now getting into bed with Barney Fwank?

HE IS NO CONSERVATIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He is a wacko!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


2 posted on 07/08/2010 11:18:13 AM PDT by Gen. Burkhalter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sic Parvis Magna

So Barney wants to cut defense spending. I guess Barney has become a deficit hawk?


3 posted on 07/08/2010 11:18:15 AM PDT by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sic Parvis Magna
> For decades, the subject of military expenditures has been glaringly absent from public debate.

BS I hear it ad nausem

4 posted on 07/08/2010 11:18:58 AM PDT by bill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sic Parvis Magna

The Odd Couple


5 posted on 07/08/2010 11:19:21 AM PDT by tgusa (Investment plan: blued steel, brass, lead, copper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen. Burkhalter

Calling attention to the fact that the Pentagon wastes billions and billions every year makes one a wacko?


6 posted on 07/08/2010 11:19:47 AM PDT by DaisyCutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sic Parvis Magna

Meanwhile, China, Russia, North Korea and Iran are greatly expanding their military capabilities. Bend over, Bawney, you’re going to take a really big one.


7 posted on 07/08/2010 11:20:16 AM PDT by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sic Parvis Magna

Iraq should’ve been made to pay war reparations.


8 posted on 07/08/2010 11:20:48 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (The usurper 0bama regime is a "Clear and Present Danger" to AMERICA! - Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sic Parvis Magna
more than all other discretionary spending programs combined.

Let's see the spending on non-discretionary items. Entitlement programs. Stuff that is unconstitutional, yet consumes the vast majority of the budget. What a pair of buffoons. The military is one of the few constitutional expenditures made by the federal government.

9 posted on 07/08/2010 11:20:52 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sic Parvis Magna

How many of the overseas military bases do we really need? Close some of those and put our fine military on the border.


10 posted on 07/08/2010 11:21:11 AM PDT by MissTed (Never buy products from ACME.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sic Parvis Magna

Traitors! Both of them. Treat them as such.


11 posted on 07/08/2010 11:21:24 AM PDT by Drill Thrawl (Rahm and George at Doe's when the knife came down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sic Parvis Magna

Yup, Barney is such a brilliant - er, something.

After all, look at his success with Fanny and Freddie Mae/

Perhaps he should do what he does best - with fannys only.


12 posted on 07/08/2010 11:22:11 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sic Parvis Magna
For decades, the subject of military expenditures has been glaringly absent from public debate.

Cutting military spending is all we heard when Clinton was President.

Maybe we can talk about the other $2 and 1/2 trillion in annual Federal spending?

13 posted on 07/08/2010 11:22:17 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaisyCutter

BHO’s agenda is clear and so is Barney Frank’s: Emasculate our military.

Wise up and get damned clue!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It disgusts me to no end when Republicans go along with the radical left agenda and give it a veneer of legitimacy.


14 posted on 07/08/2010 11:22:20 AM PDT by Gen. Burkhalter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tgusa

I wonder if Braney has asked Paul to play ‘doctor’ yet?


15 posted on 07/08/2010 11:22:20 AM PDT by Kartographer (".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty
Iraq should’ve been made to pay war reparations.

In oil.

16 posted on 07/08/2010 11:22:55 AM PDT by b4its2late (I feel so miserable without you; it's almost like having you here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: equalitybeforethelaw
I guess Barney has become a deficit hawk?

Highly doubtful.

I think it's a good idea to rein in some of the contracting, and I don't have a problem with closing some of our bases in Europe and Asia. However, I can't agree with either of them that we need to pull out of Iraq and Afghanistan without those countries being stable.

17 posted on 07/08/2010 11:23:18 AM PDT by Sic Parvis Magna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sic Parvis Magna

"You're a...."


18 posted on 07/08/2010 11:23:31 AM PDT by The Bronze Titan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sic Parvis Magna

Ron Paul = Utterly worthless

Defense spending equals JOBS. Welfare spending equals nothing.


19 posted on 07/08/2010 11:23:54 AM PDT by LeonardFMason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sic Parvis Magna
It's tough to cut military spending in a world where you are the de facto defender of liberty and freedom. The best way to get in a position to cut spending on our military would be to do the things that deter those who might consider taking us on in an armed conflict. IMHO, the starting place for that is Iran. Replace that regime that is interested more in taking good care of its citizen and less with imposing their religion on the entire world and you would have a much easier time of getting a handle on our military budget.
20 posted on 07/08/2010 11:25:24 AM PDT by jwparkerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson