General McChrystal is not stupid; few four star combat generals are. Nor is he naive. I assume that he granted extended access to Rolling Stone' reporter with his eyes wide open and with full knowledge of the sorts of things people in his position can and can't safely say and permit to be said by their aides. It got him out of a probably lost cause in Afghanistan and quite probably into a non-military venue where he may be able to do some useful things for the country. There is no longer a place for him in the Army, unless he wants to go down in history as the highest ranking senior officer ever to command a mess kit repair battalion in Alaska. There may well be a place for him in politics. His contest with President Obama, which I think he won, would give him significant pulling power with many voters and his outspoken lack of reverence for the powers that be would be far better employed in the Congress than as a serving military officer. His failure to claim that he and his aides were misquoted, or that they misspoke, and to offer a non-apology apology would also stand him in good stead.
1 posted on
06/24/2010 5:44:17 AM PDT by
DanMiller
To: DanMiller
I agree. You can only go for so long in a situation like he was in. Obummer can’t take away his military designations or his honor. We know who the hero is and nothing can change that!
To: DanMiller
I can’t get over him saying he voted for Obama. I thought he was supposed to be smart?
3 posted on
06/24/2010 5:48:01 AM PDT by
Aria
( "The US republic will endure until Congress discovers it can bribe the public with the people's $.")
To: DanMiller
This means he’s available for the 2nd Continental Army.
4 posted on
06/24/2010 5:48:36 AM PDT by
flying_bullet
(El Conservo tribe member)
To: DanMiller
It does appear McChrystal has a glaring weakness.
He is a liberal.
He is a liberal who felt comfortable bringing along a Rolling Stone reporter, and granting that reporter from that RAG a whole lot of access.
I wonder if - as many highpowered liberals do - he assumed his liberalism would protect him from being the anal exam that media libs give to other members of the military?
5 posted on
06/24/2010 5:49:31 AM PDT by
Scotswife
To: DanMiller
General McChrystal is not stupid Yes he is stupid. He voted for Obama and that puts him in the idiot category with everyone else.
7 posted on
06/24/2010 5:50:51 AM PDT by
ILS21R
(A 200 year supply of oil... in Alaska....right now)
To: DanMiller
I have to agree I think he went into this whole thing with Rolling Stone with eyes wide open, but voting for Obama in the first place makes me truly question the mans judgement.
If he thought Obama was up to the task of running a 7/11, much less the country, then he was delusional at best and a fool at worst.
8 posted on
06/24/2010 5:51:02 AM PDT by
libs_kma
(DEMOCRATS, HOT TAR AND FEATHERS. SOME ASSEMBLY REQUIRED.)
To: DanMiller
When does he get the contract with FNC?
9 posted on
06/24/2010 5:51:31 AM PDT by
sickoflibs
( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
To: DanMiller
General McChrystal should have presented his grievances to President Obama directly and in no uncertain terms. If President Obama refused to remedy General McChrystal’s grievances, the General should have resigned and held a press conference to explain to the public his grievances and the reason for his resignation.
11 posted on
06/24/2010 5:59:27 AM PDT by
Savage Beast
("True evil has a face you know and a voice you trust." ~Greg Iles. "True Evil")
To: DanMiller
There's only one thing I want to see McChrystal do is retire from service and hit the Sunday shows non-stop talking truth about what this pos-potus is doing to the military.
If he walks away and quits the fight then he loses my respect, regardless of what else he might do.
12 posted on
06/24/2010 6:01:06 AM PDT by
wtc911
("How you gonna get down that hill?")
To: DanMiller
Let’s stop idolizing the obama voting liberal general now.
24 posted on
06/24/2010 6:19:30 AM PDT by
omega4179
(www.jdforsenate.com)
To: DanMiller
Did he resign or was he relieved of his command? I have seen both being used interchangeably by the media. There is a distinct difference!
31 posted on
06/24/2010 6:30:24 AM PDT by
SW6906
(6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
To: DanMiller
I don’t buy into - for one second - the too cute by half rationalization that this was planned. The guy is an oddball. In a weak moment, his hubris caused a lack of discipline.
To: DanMiller
Strategy or conspiracy or war games or politics, take your pick. McChrystal says he voted for Obama, something that he could have kept private but must have seen a gain or advantage to himself by going public. Now he places himself in a position to get fired and his boss, Genl Petraus moves down a peg making room for an Obama replacement who will carry out whatever the new plans are. Whom do I trust? Nobody.
34 posted on
06/24/2010 6:35:43 AM PDT by
mountainfolk
(God Bless the United States of America)
To: DanMiller
43 posted on
06/24/2010 7:04:15 AM PDT by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: DanMiller
Let's not pin hopes on the General going on TV and telling all the dirt any time soon.
As long as he's in the service he will maintain military honor and not bad-mouth Obama or his ambassadors or policies or anything. Remember, his life blood is the army. He's West Point and I believe his father was a general, also.
If and when he retires, all bets are off.
Leni
To: DanMiller
“To win this war, America, and its generals, need to be led by someone who really wants to win the war. Someone who believes his country is great, and extraordinary, and deserves to win its wars. “
This, in my opinion, is the essence of the problem. Obama is of the school of thought that considers America undeserving of winning its wars.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson