Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The War Between Obama and McChrystal Is Over — Obama Lost
Pajamas Media ^ | June 24, 2010 | Dan Miller

Posted on 06/24/2010 5:44:14 AM PDT by DanMiller

Following a thirty minute meeting with President Obama, General McChrystal departed the White House “before Obama convened a regularly scheduled war planning meeting there.” That was a pretty good indication of what was to come. An announcement that General McChrystal had been relieved of his command by President Obama was made later on June 23. General McChrystal is to be replaced by General Petraeus.

(Excerpt) Read more at pajamasmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: 201006; 20100623; afghanistan; army; generalmcchrystal; mcchrystal; presidentobama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
General McChrystal is not stupid; few four star combat generals are. Nor is he naive. I assume that he granted extended access to Rolling Stone' reporter with his eyes wide open and with full knowledge of the sorts of things people in his position can and can't safely say and permit to be said by their aides. It got him out of a probably lost cause in Afghanistan and quite probably into a non-military venue where he may be able to do some useful things for the country. There is no longer a place for him in the Army, unless he wants to go down in history as the highest ranking senior officer ever to command a mess kit repair battalion in Alaska. There may well be a place for him in politics. His contest with President Obama, which I think he won, would give him significant pulling power with many voters and his outspoken lack of reverence for the powers that be would be far better employed in the Congress than as a serving military officer. His failure to claim that he and his aides were misquoted, or that they misspoke, and to offer a non-apology apology would also stand him in good stead.
1 posted on 06/24/2010 5:44:17 AM PDT by DanMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DanMiller

I agree. You can only go for so long in a situation like he was in. Obummer can’t take away his military designations or his honor. We know who the hero is and nothing can change that!


2 posted on 06/24/2010 5:47:54 AM PDT by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DanMiller

I can’t get over him saying he voted for Obama. I thought he was supposed to be smart?


3 posted on 06/24/2010 5:48:01 AM PDT by Aria ( "The US republic will endure until Congress discovers it can bribe the public with the people's $.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DanMiller

This means he’s available for the 2nd Continental Army.


4 posted on 06/24/2010 5:48:36 AM PDT by flying_bullet (El Conservo tribe member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DanMiller

It does appear McChrystal has a glaring weakness.
He is a liberal.

He is a liberal who felt comfortable bringing along a Rolling Stone reporter, and granting that reporter from that RAG a whole lot of access.

I wonder if - as many highpowered liberals do - he assumed his liberalism would protect him from being the anal exam that media libs give to other members of the military?


5 posted on 06/24/2010 5:49:31 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

should read “being subjected to the anal exam”


6 posted on 06/24/2010 5:50:43 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DanMiller
General McChrystal is not stupid

Yes he is stupid. He voted for Obama and that puts him in the idiot category with everyone else.

7 posted on 06/24/2010 5:50:51 AM PDT by ILS21R (A 200 year supply of oil... in Alaska....right now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DanMiller
I have to agree I think he went into this whole thing with Rolling Stone with eyes wide open, but voting for Obama in the first place makes me truly question the mans judgement.

If he thought Obama was up to the task of running a 7/11, much less the country, then he was delusional at best and a fool at worst.

8 posted on 06/24/2010 5:51:02 AM PDT by libs_kma (DEMOCRATS, HOT TAR AND FEATHERS. SOME ASSEMBLY REQUIRED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DanMiller

When does he get the contract with FNC?


9 posted on 06/24/2010 5:51:31 AM PDT by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Well, he could always apply for the job of football coach at West Point.


10 posted on 06/24/2010 5:55:06 AM PDT by Mobties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DanMiller

General McChrystal should have presented his grievances to President Obama directly and in no uncertain terms. If President Obama refused to remedy General McChrystal’s grievances, the General should have resigned and held a press conference to explain to the public his grievances and the reason for his resignation.


11 posted on 06/24/2010 5:59:27 AM PDT by Savage Beast ("True evil has a face you know and a voice you trust." ~Greg Iles. "True Evil")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DanMiller
There's only one thing I want to see McChrystal do is retire from service and hit the Sunday shows non-stop talking truth about what this pos-potus is doing to the military.

If he walks away and quits the fight then he loses my respect, regardless of what else he might do.

12 posted on 06/24/2010 6:01:06 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

SPOT ON! What we are seeing is an attempted ressurection of his military and special ops victories to cover up the fact that he had an evaluative bent that overexposed anything that he had done before. The fact that he voted for Obama followed by his willing and “faithful execution” of the ROE’s that has gotten many of our best KIA needlessly.

It only takes one OS to erase a boat load of “attaboys”. In his case, he wiped out an entire fleet of boatloads. It is nothing more than the same crap we went through during VietNam.

So what did his “faithful execution” of Obama’s orders get him? Being the sacrifical lamb to bring the pResident up in the polls by the MSM equating him with the the McClellan and MacAurthur scenarios.

Isn’t it also an irony that all three were “macs”? Maybe just one more “mac” needs to lose his current position.


13 posted on 06/24/2010 6:02:16 AM PDT by mazda77 (Rubio for US Senate - West FL22nd - JD Hayworth - US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

Maybe McChrystal knows McCain from dealing with him in Congress.


14 posted on 06/24/2010 6:03:14 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife
It does appear McChrystal has a glaring weakness. He is a liberal. He is a liberal who felt comfortable bringing along a Rolling Stone reporter, and granting that reporter from that RAG a whole lot of access. I wonder if - as many highpowered liberals do - he assumed his liberalism would protect him from being the anal exam that media libs give to other members of the military?

I disagree with part of your statement(s). Maybe he is a liberal but I also think he is a smart and crafty liberal. I believe he realized that any statements he made to the "standard" MSM would be doctored up, changed, edited, mis-quoted and then would be further botched up in the re-reporting of them. By going to a media such as Rolling Stones he bypasses the NYT, WSJ, LA Times, mindset. He ensured his message would get out.

I also believe he did the interview with the precise goal of being dropped from the Afghan mess. It has become obvious that the White House has no idea on how to run a war and General McChrystal did not want to be pegged as the reason the strategy failed. He is smart enough to know that he would become the scapegoat for the failing policies of the great Zero. I admire him for doing what needed to be done. He has saved his reputation and I think enhanced it (even if he is a liberal). Remember Truman was a liberal and Reagan was a liberal. Fortunately Truman was a smart liberal and Reagan had the intelligence to change.

15 posted on 06/24/2010 6:05:08 AM PDT by ProudFossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Aria

It may be that he thought o was better than mac. If mac had not chosen Sarah, I am not sure how I would have voted. I did not like any of the choices. I am still not convinced mac or helary would have been any better. CONGRESS is too lib.


16 posted on 06/24/2010 6:06:54 AM PDT by mathluv ( Conservative first and foremost, republican second - GO SARAHCUDA!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Aria
I can’t get over him saying he voted for Obama. I thought he was supposed to be smart?

I'm not happy about him banning FOX news from the troops.

I remember hearing this a while ago and wondered then what sort of man was in charge.

17 posted on 06/24/2010 6:09:25 AM PDT by CAluvdubya (WASS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ProudFossil

how often have you read Rolling Stone magazine?


18 posted on 06/24/2010 6:11:03 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
When does he get the contract with FNC?

Just as soon as Hannity decides he needs another Alan Colmes.
19 posted on 06/24/2010 6:12:27 AM PDT by Renderofveils (My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music. - Nabokov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Aria
I can’t get over him saying he voted for Obama. I thought he was supposed to be smart?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Yeah, my thoughts exactly. And,...He banned Fox News?

If he did go into politics, it would be on the side of the socialists/Marxists? Would conservatives want him? I surely wouldn't.

20 posted on 06/24/2010 6:13:20 AM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson