Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NBC's Andrea Mitchell: McChrystal Was Insubordinate And Should Be "Canned"
RealClearPolitics ^ | June 22, 2010 | RealClearPolitics

Posted on 06/22/2010 7:04:51 AM PDT by i88schwartz

What Gen. McChrystal said "crosses the line of insubordination and it crosses the line of the military code of justice. He has challenged the commander-in-chief and legally, morally, ethically and professionally he ought to be canned."

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: andreamitchell; barackobama; stanleymcchrystal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: FlingWingFlyer

My dh commented recently that alot of the casualities are Army, not Marine. He said it indicates that the troops are not on the move, just sitting still as targets. McCrystal may have expressed his frustration privately with no response from Obama and the other politicians.


41 posted on 06/22/2010 7:32:04 AM PDT by Fu-fu2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

If 80% of the military agrees with McXtal then he needs to fire them also and find some new recruits.
My only question is..who invented the current ROE? McXtal or the WH?


42 posted on 06/22/2010 7:32:22 AM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: shalom aleichem
Anyone who criticized Dubya was a media darling.

And if they were active military, American Heros.

43 posted on 06/22/2010 7:32:31 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

A soldier takes an oath to the Constitution not to the President. That being said, you are correct, if he’s got a problem with order, resign and take your gripes to the press and public.

McChrystal can do a lot more damage out of the military then he can in. A bunch of interviews and a good book will go a long way to take care of Zero.


44 posted on 06/22/2010 7:33:10 AM PDT by Recon Dad ( Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad
The oath is not only to the Constitution, it is to obey the lawful orders of the officers assigned over you and the POTUS.

So the oath is in fact an oath of duty to the office of the Presidency, insofar as the individual serving that role is fulfilling his Constitutional duty and issuing lawful orders.

45 posted on 06/22/2010 7:36:57 AM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: RJS1950

“Both were meglomaniacs who had Caesar complexes.”

You are absolutely correct. Except, McCelland would not fight.


46 posted on 06/22/2010 7:37:51 AM PDT by Tupelo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz; All
Lib Talking Pets
47 posted on 06/22/2010 7:38:25 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
This isn’t partisan — this is about chain of command.

Unfortunately, you are correct, but I have never seen the disdain for any president by the troops as I have since zero was elected.

48 posted on 06/22/2010 7:40:23 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Remember in November. Clean the house on Nov. 2. / Progressive is a PC word for liberal democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

What would this witch know about being insubordinate? /sarc


49 posted on 06/22/2010 7:40:23 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

Oh, great. Like I really want a biased media news reader setting combat policy for my Marine son in Afghanistan.

Being televised does NOT impart any special knowledge or wisdom. Maybe this is why we have to endure so much of Obama on TV? If we hear enough, we’ll actually think he’s smart? Maybe he needs to adopt a cultured, British accent...


50 posted on 06/22/2010 7:40:28 AM PDT by Tigerized (pursuingliberty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

Excuse me, but didn’t Obama already throw this guy under the bus a while back? Something to do with needed troops.


51 posted on 06/22/2010 7:41:11 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

The important thing is *why* McChrystal did this. Don’t for a second assume he just blurted this out. He wanted it to be said, and said in a national print forum that would be widely read, would not be suppressed or severely edited, and would have high credibility on the political left.

And he knew he would be fired because of it. And also notice that his staff know that they are going to be fired as well.

‘The article, titled “The Runaway General,” appears in the magazine later this week. It contains a number of jabs by McChrystal and his staff aimed not only at the President but at Vice President Biden, special envoy Richard Holbrooke, Karl Eikenberry, the ambassador to Afghanistan, and others.’


52 posted on 06/22/2010 7:44:18 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Two New Episodes of 'Futurama', this June 24th, on Comedy Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck
There MUST be some example of the media fawning over a general officer criticizing Bush that can be used to show blatant media bias.

Remember the Bush TXANG faked documents? That LTC and warrant officer were praised by the SRM, even after they were known fakes.

53 posted on 06/22/2010 7:45:27 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Remember in November. Clean the house on Nov. 2. / Progressive is a PC word for liberal democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

Finally. 0bama found some ass to kick!


54 posted on 06/22/2010 8:01:38 AM PDT by FrdmLvr ( VIVA la SB 1070!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo
Truman had the authority to fire MacArthur, but there should be no question as to who knew how to wage the Korean War.

It certainly was not the hat salesman who was soft on Communism.

55 posted on 06/22/2010 8:02:57 AM PDT by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

RE: The oath is not only to the Constitution, it is to obey the lawful orders of the officers assigned over you and the POTUS

Officers swear an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and not to POTUS. In Nazi Germany the military swore an oath to Hitler and not to Germany


56 posted on 06/22/2010 8:09:09 AM PDT by jesseam (Been there, done that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
You can speak out, but if you do you should first resign your Commission. The President is Commander in Chief, and officers under his command should publicly support his orders, even if they privately disagree. If they cannot, they need to resign.

So, what you are saying, in effect, is that the military should follow orders blindly, as they did in the German army in WWII, regardless of the legality or the harm the orders do to the military. Over and above what the Officer owes to the CIC is what he owes to his troops. He should have spoken directly to the President and if that failed then he has every right nay, a duty, to speak out openly against the President against what he sees as harmful orders and policies. He will most likely lose his job in doing so but the people will be warned.

BTW, I think McA should have gone ahead and bombed the crap out of North Korea and the Chinese troops screaming down towards the south as he proposed. Truman was wrong, as history has well proven. Korea's cease fire is the reason we had to fight in Vietnam.

57 posted on 06/22/2010 8:11:13 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

The entire article is bullroar and the author shows to the world a massive incompetence in his material. Any officer or enlisted man has the right to pass a contrary opinion up the chain of command to be considered by his superiors. We do not want automatons commanding our military personnel in the field. We want original thinkers who are willing to improvise and get the job done in the face of tremendous difficulties.

Choose good personnel, tell them what you want them to do and let them get on with the job. Any person in Washington, DC has not the slightest idea what is going on in the field. That is why one has field commanders. If the field commander sees a problem he has the responsibility to get the policy changed.

Looking over 12,000 miles and scores of years, one does not have to be a professional military to know the our personnel are operating under terrible (if not criminal) rules of engagement.

The other problem which no one will touch is that Obama, under the Constitution, is not elgible (and certainly qualified) to be President of the United States or Commander in Chief. May God have mercy on this country. When a country has poor or incompetent leaders the people pay the price in blood.


58 posted on 06/22/2010 8:11:22 AM PDT by Citizen Tom Paine (Trust but verify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

Obama needs to be impeached, tried for treason and shipped to Gitmo to rot with his muslim buddies.


59 posted on 06/22/2010 8:13:05 AM PDT by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thethirddegree

As terrible as 2.5 more years under this thuggish regime will be, the problem is not an America-hating narcissist in our White House. The real issue is parasitic voters who think spreading other people’s wealth around is a good thing, the voters who don’t understand that wealth has to be created by the people they are stealing from. We need to keep this evil thug in power for the full four years, so that his voters will learn from their mistake. Otherwise, they’ll eventually do it again. The next time might be with a competent socialist (and they do exist, even if they are rare), and that would be even worse than the clown we have now.


60 posted on 06/22/2010 8:19:14 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson