Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: i88schwartz
The Democrat party doesn't need help embarrassing itself.
To: i88schwartz
And just how would he know that “all you need is a magnet”?
Hmmmmm....
3 posted on
06/15/2010 5:26:47 AM PDT by
pingman
(Price is what you pay, value is what you get.)
To: i88schwartz
Nice of the idiot to worry about all these things after the primary.
4 posted on
06/15/2010 5:26:53 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: i88schwartz
Wonder how Alvin Greene feels about his fellow Dems treating him like the skunk at the picnic.
5 posted on
06/15/2010 5:27:28 AM PDT by
La Lydia
To: i88schwartz
“Something went wrong with these machines,” Clyburn said. “They were very unreliable,” he added.
I wonder if Clyburn ever commented when a Rat got more votes in a precinct than there were voters registered?
6 posted on
06/15/2010 5:27:53 AM PDT by
Recon Dad
( Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things)
To: i88schwartz
After 2000, I really thought both political parties would push for voting reforms. Get tamper-proof machines. Find a clear ballot design. Clean up the voter rolls. Require identification. Something. Anything.
Neither political party pushed for reform.
I decided at that point that elections in this country turn out the way they were meant to turn out. Greene may be the exception which shocks people because the system failed.
Basically, it's all a scam.
To: i88schwartz
I know its old and worn out but I call this a “trial run” by the left.
Win the elections by any possible means. Time for fundraising!
They will need billions to buy the votes, buy the machines, buy the judges,and to buy the enforcement that will insure nobody questions them.
Same as Obamas election.
9 posted on
06/15/2010 5:31:40 AM PDT by
Eye of Unk
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" G.Orwell)
To: i88schwartz
It looks like the same machine made Rep. Clyburn a senator for this article (see title).
Democrats loathe voting machines. Machines frustrate their preferred method of cheating, perfected over countless election cycles, of stuffing ballot boxes with manufactured paper votes.
To: i88schwartz
This is just delicious.
Who would have thought that democrat voter fraud would be rampant in Spartanburg?
I mean will the rat hell holes of Philadelphia and Chicago, and St Louis now be exposed for the fraud centers they are?
11 posted on
06/15/2010 5:35:02 AM PDT by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . Ostracize Democrats. There can be no Democrat friends.)
To: i88schwartz
He is on Fox and Friends right now. Clyburn is clearly delusional. Gretchen cannot believe what she is hearing.
To: i88schwartz
First comes spring and summer, but then we have fall and winter.
And then we get spring and summer again.
14 posted on
06/15/2010 5:38:31 AM PDT by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: i88schwartz
The only way a Democrat could ever lose any election/nomination is if it was stolen.
Of course, a Democrat did win the election/nomination, but that just proves the point.
17 posted on
06/15/2010 5:39:00 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
To: i88schwartz
More likely few were interested in who the Democrat candidate turned out to be because that person was very unlikely to win.
To: i88schwartz
Seems like the Dems had trouble vetting a candidate again.
22 posted on
06/15/2010 5:42:06 AM PDT by
IamConservative
(Liberty is all a good man needs to succeed.)
To: i88schwartz
23 posted on
06/15/2010 5:42:07 AM PDT by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not A Matter Of Opinion)
To: i88schwartz
Put up or shut up.
Proove it!
24 posted on
06/15/2010 5:42:33 AM PDT by
onedoug
To: i88schwartz
THEY win...the machines are great; the DON'T win, and the machines are "unreliable".
Typical democrat/liberal B.S.; hanging magnetic chads, right?
29 posted on
06/15/2010 5:45:52 AM PDT by
FrankR
(Standing against tyranny must start somewhere, or the future belongs to the tyrants.)
To: i88schwartz
Is Clyburn a member of the Senate or the House?
34 posted on
06/15/2010 5:49:49 AM PDT by
paudio
(Are you better off today than in 2006, when the Democrats took over the Congress?)
To: i88schwartz
As usual, it is not the veracity of the evidence, it is the seriousness of the charge made that counts.
36 posted on
06/15/2010 5:52:11 AM PDT by
Bean Counter
(Stout hearts...)
To: i88schwartz
"The motive could very well be to embarass (sic) the Democratic party. IOW, if a unknown, poor, homeless, black, veteran wins over a rich white establishment party guy, there's an embarrassment?.......boy is this guy gonna get his comeuppance.........
39 posted on
06/15/2010 5:55:17 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(No, Obama's not the Antichrist. He's just some guy in the neighborhood.............)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson