Posted on 05/18/2010 6:58:04 AM PDT by Thurston_Howell_III
The Coney Island Drive Inn, a restaurant in Brooksville, Florida, has been selling 12-inch hotdogs the restaurant calls them footlongs for more than 40 years. Its Web site is gotfootlongs.com.
Last week, the restaurant got a letter from a lawyer representing Subway, which, as you may have heard, sells 12-inch sandwiches for five bucks.
After explaining that Subway has applied for the trademark FOOTLONG (TM) in association with sandwiches, the letter says:
You are hereby put on notice to cease and desist from using FOOTLONG (TM) in association with sandwiches. You must immediately remove all references to FOOTLONG (TM) in association with sandwiches.
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...
That would be animal cruelty. I love my dog more than that.
the
Sue me!
So, you admit it, huh? ;)
You may as well try trademarking "Sandwich"
Abathar: “Attempting to increase your sales...”
That’s the ridiculous part of this. Who doesn’t already know that Subway sells footlong and 6” sub sandwiches. How much business does the corporate office think they are going to gain by squashing small shops that use the same term? How much business will they lose by bad press? Probably more than the former question.
I doubt that they were registered trademarks, but foot-long hot dogs from any number of sources pre-date Subway by many decades.
I think John Holmes was the first to coin the phrase “footlong sandwich.”
I have trademarked the term “foot” and “long” separately, Subway is about to get sued for Bazillion dollars.
Reminds me of Spike Lee trying to own the name Spike (he lost). Spike Jones had it first.
Subway could probably trademark “Lettuce Sandwich” and no one would object to that reality.
"No."
"Footlong" IS a Trademark. It is not a Registered Trademark, but has been used openly by many entities for decades. Subway's trademark registration should not be allowed, and the eatery should get a lawyer and turn on Subway. If they get the right lawyer, they could cause Subway a world of hurt. Subway wants the Trademark, and does not want to buy it from the people using it, so they resort to barratry. Of COURSE Subway is aware of the prior uses.
Serial Number Reg. Number Word Mark Check Status Live/Dead 1 77658312 $5 FOOTLONGS TARR LIVE 2 77752328 FOOTLONG TARR LIVE 3 77324328 FOOTLONG TARR LIVE 4 76586913 2939541 FOOTLONG EXPRESS TARR DEAD 5 75308314 2161133 FOOTLONG EXPRESS TARR DEAD 6 74597430 1948530 WONDERDOGS FRANK FOOTLONG KNOCKWURST TARR DEAD
The first several are not germaine to hot dogs. The last did not specifically claim the use of "footlong".
However, if it already in current use, they have no more right to it than I do for Windows.
IANAL, I just pay them,
You colonial ruffian! I must protest, sir!
Okay, okay.....Here's your 5 bucks
but YOU have to figure out how to get them into Paypal!
-----
neener-neener ;-)
I just dont think you should be able to trademark something like that, a common word.
I got dibs on The
Subway is ok in a pinch...But because of the idiocy of this idea...Quiznos will get my business.
I agree.
What a stupid corporate move. Their advertising has given them the "footlong" association they want.
Taking it this far will only lose business for them.
The porn industry might have something to say about this.
Awhile back, I saw a news bit on a lawsuit about McDonald’s suing an eating establishment in Scotland over use of the name “McDonald’s”. It showed a bearded fellow standing in front of what looked like a hunting lodge. He said he was the Earl of McDonald (or something like that) and that that establishment had been serving food and wee drams for hundreds of years. He said “I should sue them!”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.