Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Subway" Trying To Trademark "Footlong", sending cease and desist letters to local sandwich shops
WSJ ^

Posted on 05/18/2010 6:58:04 AM PDT by Thurston_Howell_III

The Coney Island Drive Inn, a restaurant in Brooksville, Florida, has been selling 12-inch hotdogs — the restaurant calls them “footlongs” — for more than 40 years. Its Web site is gotfootlongs.com.

Last week, the restaurant got a letter from a lawyer representing Subway, which, as you may have heard, sells 12-inch sandwiches for five bucks.

After explaining that Subway “has applied for the trademark FOOTLONG (TM) in association with sandwiches,” the letter says:

You are hereby put on notice to cease and desist from using FOOTLONG (TM) in association with sandwiches. You must immediately remove all references to FOOTLONG (TM) in association with sandwiches.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: footlong; lawsuit; sandwich; subway
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: massgopguy
Subway is dog food

That would be animal cruelty. I love my dog more than that.

21 posted on 05/18/2010 7:10:36 AM PDT by rightly_dividing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bgill

the

Sue me!


22 posted on 05/18/2010 7:11:23 AM PDT by CitizenUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
...we were infringing on Subway’s future rights?!

So, you admit it, huh? ;)

23 posted on 05/18/2010 7:11:57 AM PDT by TankerKC (R.I.P. Spc Trevor A. Win'E American Hero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Thurston_Howell_III
Sorry Subway, "Footlong" has been a part of American culture for over a centurty.

You may as well try trademarking "Sandwich"

24 posted on 05/18/2010 7:12:09 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 481 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
"They were not the first shops to sell 12” sandwiches. "

Not that I am defending them - I am not - but they obviously the first to think about copywriting the term "footlong", so that will make it theirs, by law anyway.

And hey, you know those poor lawyers need to have something meaningful to do besides whiplash and asbestos poisoning, so they are chasing down "footlong" merchants and sending "cease and desist" letters.

I think Subway should be boycotted for using its National standing to harass and financially damage the small businessman.

Any rational American associates the word "footlong" with a hot dog, not a sub.

The Subway company are bullies...I'm switching to Quiznos.
25 posted on 05/18/2010 7:12:37 AM PDT by FrankR (Standing against tyranny must start somewhere, or the future belongs to the tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Abathar: “Attempting to increase your sales...”

That’s the ridiculous part of this. Who doesn’t already know that Subway sells footlong and 6” sub sandwiches. How much business does the corporate office think they are going to gain by squashing small shops that use the same term? How much business will they lose by bad press? Probably more than the former question.


26 posted on 05/18/2010 7:14:22 AM PDT by CitizenUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Thurston_Howell_III

I doubt that they were registered trademarks, but foot-long hot dogs from any number of sources pre-date Subway by many decades.


27 posted on 05/18/2010 7:15:54 AM PDT by luvbach1 (Stop Barry now. He can't help himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thurston_Howell_III

I think John Holmes was the first to coin the phrase “footlong sandwich.”


28 posted on 05/18/2010 7:17:54 AM PDT by decisis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thurston_Howell_III

I have trademarked the term “foot” and “long” separately, Subway is about to get sued for Bazillion dollars.


29 posted on 05/18/2010 7:18:11 AM PDT by Brett66 (Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thurston_Howell_III

Reminds me of Spike Lee trying to own the name Spike (he lost). Spike Jones had it first.


30 posted on 05/18/2010 7:18:45 AM PDT by luvbach1 (Stop Barry now. He can't help himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thurston_Howell_III

Subway could probably trademark “Lettuce Sandwich” and no one would object to that reality.


31 posted on 05/18/2010 7:19:03 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Ostracize Democrats. There can be no Democrat friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thurston_Howell_III
Their quick, short reply should be:

"No."

32 posted on 05/18/2010 7:20:18 AM PDT by CT-Freeper (www.ctf.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
I think they’re going to have problems, “footlong” hot dogs having been part of the public vernacular for a VERY long time.

"Footlong" IS a Trademark. It is not a Registered Trademark, but has been used openly by many entities for decades. Subway's trademark registration should not be allowed, and the eatery should get a lawyer and turn on Subway. If they get the right lawyer, they could cause Subway a world of hurt. Subway wants the Trademark, and does not want to buy it from the people using it, so they resort to barratry. Of COURSE Subway is aware of the prior uses.

Serial Number Reg. Number Word Mark Check Status Live/Dead 1 77658312 $5 FOOTLONGS TARR LIVE 2 77752328 FOOTLONG TARR LIVE 3 77324328 FOOTLONG TARR LIVE 4 76586913 2939541 FOOTLONG EXPRESS TARR DEAD 5 75308314 2161133 FOOTLONG EXPRESS TARR DEAD 6 74597430 1948530 WONDERDOGS FRANK FOOTLONG KNOCKWURST TARR DEAD

The first several are not germaine to hot dogs. The last did not specifically claim the use of "footlong".

However, if it already in current use, they have no more right to it than I do for Windows™.

IANAL, I just pay them,

33 posted on 05/18/2010 7:20:51 AM PDT by Gorzaloon (CNN:AP:etc:Today, President Obama's stool was firm and well-formed. One end was slightly pointed. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: null and void
You may as well try trademarking "Sandwich"

You colonial ruffian! I must protest, sir!


34 posted on 05/18/2010 7:21:25 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AussieJoe
I just applied for a trademark on “INCHWORM” therefore I hereby order you to cease & desist... or alternatively put 5 bucks in my paypal account every time someone reads your post :-P

Okay, okay.....Here's your 5 bucks

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

but YOU have to figure out how to get them into Paypal!

-----

neener-neener ;-)

35 posted on 05/18/2010 7:21:38 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am not a administrative, corporate, collective, legal, political or public entity or ~person~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

I just don’t think you should be able to trademark something like that, a common word.

I got dibs on ‘The’


36 posted on 05/18/2010 7:21:52 AM PDT by GeronL (Political Correctness Kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Thurston_Howell_III

Subway is ok in a pinch...But because of the idiocy of this idea...Quiznos will get my business.


37 posted on 05/18/2010 7:22:56 AM PDT by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
Who doesn’t already know that Subway sells footlong and 6” sub sandwiches. How much business does the corporate office think they are going to gain by squashing small shops that use the same term? How much business will they lose by bad press?

I agree.

What a stupid corporate move. Their advertising has given them the "footlong" association they want.

Taking it this far will only lose business for them.

38 posted on 05/18/2010 7:23:35 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Thurston_Howell_III

The porn industry might have something to say about this.


39 posted on 05/18/2010 7:24:45 AM PDT by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

Awhile back, I saw a news bit on a lawsuit about McDonald’s suing an eating establishment in Scotland over use of the name “McDonald’s”. It showed a bearded fellow standing in front of what looked like a hunting lodge. He said he was the Earl of McDonald (or something like that) and that that establishment had been serving food and wee drams for hundreds of years. He said “I should sue them!”.


40 posted on 05/18/2010 7:25:46 AM PDT by blackd77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson