Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Investigators: Obama using Connecticut Soc. Sec. Number
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | May 11, 2010 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 05/11/2010 7:01:30 PM PDT by Man50D

Two private investigators working independently are asking why President Obama is using a Social Security number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state.

In addition, the records indicate the number was issued between 1977 and 1979, yet Obama's earliest employment reportedly was in 1975 at a Baskin & Robbins ice cream shop in Oahu, Hawaii.

WND has copies of affidavits filed separately in a presidential eligibility lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia by Ohio licensed private investigator Susan Daniels and Colorado private investigator John N. Sampson.

The investigators believe Obama needs to explain why he is using a Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants that was issued at a date later than he is known to have held employment.

The Social Security website confirms the first three numbers in his ID are reserved for applicants with Connecticut addresses, 040-049.

"Since 1973, Social Security numbers have been issued by our central office," the Social Security website explains. "The first three (3) digits of a person's social security number are determined by the ZIP code of the mailing address shown on the application for a social security number."

The question is being raised amid speculation about the president's history fueled by an extraordinary lack of public documentation. Along with his original birth certificate, Obama also has not released educational records, scholarly articles, passport documents, medical records, papers from his service in the Illinois state Senate, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and adoption papers.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: article2section1; birthcertificate; certifigate; connecticutnumber; eligibility; identitytheft; impeachobama; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamafraud; president; socialsecurity; ssn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last
To: Man50D; governsleastgovernsbest

Hey, is this going to be on THE TODAY SHOW tomorrow?


21 posted on 05/11/2010 7:28:20 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx; penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; ...

~~Ping!


22 posted on 05/11/2010 7:28:25 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
One has to wonder what Obama’s presidential library will contain...
23 posted on 05/11/2010 7:28:41 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

finding this guys identity could avoid lightin that nuke

you and I know this bum is a liar and an illegal fraud...

...pounding this issue has not one down side, not one.

..I don’t give a democratic crap who thinks what about it either

..this is a real issue and it WILL find it’s truth


24 posted on 05/11/2010 7:28:44 PM PDT by advertising guy (Consumer Of Confiscated Liquers Czar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

I was under the impression that the current SSN assignments are based on the state that the applicant lives in- regardless where they apply.

In my day- I applied for my number in 1971- I applied and came home from the social security office with my card, the first 3 numbers were based on the office I applied at.

When did they change the protocol.


25 posted on 05/11/2010 7:29:04 PM PDT by I_Like_Spam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Oh, boy, this could get really interesting.
26 posted on 05/11/2010 7:29:12 PM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D; STARWISE

Ruh roh


27 posted on 05/11/2010 7:29:21 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_Like_Spam
Sounds like the procedure changed in 1973. (From SS web site)

Since 1973, social security numbers have been issued by our central office. The first three (3) digits of a person's social security number are determined by the ZIP Code of the mailing address shown on the application for a social security number. Prior to 1973, social security numbers were assigned by our field offices. The number merely established that his/her card was issued by one of our offices in that State.

28 posted on 05/11/2010 7:33:56 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
From Article: "Since 1973, Social Security numbers have been issued by our central office," the Social Security website explains. "The first three (3) digits of a person's social security number are determined by the ZIP code of the mailing address shown on the application for a social security number."

The first 3 digits of my grandchildrens SS (all born after 1973) are not the first 3 digits of their ZIP code.

29 posted on 05/11/2010 7:37:33 PM PDT by Spunky (You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
The first 3 digits of my grandchildrens SS (all born after 1973) are not the first 3 digits of their ZIP code.

I interpreted that passage to mean there was a pool of the first three numbers assigned to a zip code but I could be wrong.
30 posted on 05/11/2010 7:40:52 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: P8riot

Weezer


31 posted on 05/11/2010 7:44:53 PM PDT by VRW Conspirator (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

“We did not want to compromise the office of the presidency with disclosure of the existence of President Obama’s ... I’ll just come right out and say it: the president has a twin brother—and his sibling is pure evil—but the braying jackals of the press have forced our hand.
His name is Osama. Yes, that Osama and blah blah blah...”
Robert Gibbs (sweating profusely)


32 posted on 05/11/2010 7:45:29 PM PDT by tumblindice (They were born in the wagon of a traveling caravan. Their Momma used to dance barefoot in the sand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinSacto

Scott,

“If this was Bush, he would already be gone.”

Shucks, Rab thought Bush was already gone.


33 posted on 05/11/2010 7:50:35 PM PDT by Rabin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Spunky

According to some web site I just googled, here’s the codes used by the states:

001-003
New Hampshire

478-485
Iowa

004-007
Maine

486-500
Missouri

008-009
Vermont

501-502
North Dakota

010-034
Massachusetts

503-504
South Dakota

035-039
Rhode Island

505-508
Nebraska

040-049
Connecticut

509-515
Kansas

050-134
New York

516-517
Montana

135-158
New Jersey

518-519
Idaho

159-211
Pennsylvania

520
Wyoming

212-220
Maryland

521-524
Colorado

211-222
Delaware

525
New Mexico

223-231
Virginia

526
Arizona

232
North Carolina

526
New Mexico

232
West Virginia

527
Arizona

233-236
West Virginia

528-529
Utah

237-246
North Carolina

530
Nevada

247-251
South Carolina

531-539
Washington

252-260
Georgia

540-544
Oregon

261-267
Florida (Also 589-595)

545-573
California

268-302
Ohio

574
Alaska

303-317
Indiana

575-576
Hawaii

318-361
Illinois

577-579
District of Columbia

362-386
Michigan

580
Virgin Islands

387-399
Wisconsin

580-584
Puerto Rico

400-407
Kentucky

585
New Mexico

408-415
Tennessee

586
Guam & American Samoa

416-424
Alabama

586
All Other Pacific Territories

425-428
Mississippi

587-588
Mississippi

429-432
Arkansas

589-595
Florida (also 261-267)

433-439
Louisiana

600-601
Arizona (designated)

440-448
Oklahoma

602-626
California (designated)

449-467
Texas

700-728
Railroad Retirement

468-477
Minnesota

729-999
Currently not in use


34 posted on 05/11/2010 7:51:16 PM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Simple explanation:

the man is a fraud


35 posted on 05/11/2010 7:53:35 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

I sure wish this was brought up before the Kenyan was elected. This is very very interesting. Since 0bama has had multiple legal names he has had multiple SS numbers...to kinda get off to a fresh start


36 posted on 05/11/2010 7:57:27 PM PDT by dennisw (It all comes 'round again --Fairport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
The question is being raised amid speculation about the president's history fueled by an extraordinary lack of public documentation.

Ya'll racists! Don't ya know dat Messiah don need no birth certficationnnn?? aaaand if he Messiah, he foreign student of the oder (Kenyan) world, soooo no skul rekords needed and he can have as many SSN as he wants.

37 posted on 05/11/2010 7:57:44 PM PDT by Leo Carpathian (fffffFRrrreeeeepppeeee-ssed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

The SS website also says that numbers assigned prior to 1972 were assigned based on the state where the original application was made, so the effect is the same: nobody applying in Hawaii would get a Connecticut number - unless for some really good reason he had applied for a replacement soc security number while living in Conn.

But he hasn’t lived in Connecticut, has he?
Or has he?


38 posted on 05/11/2010 7:59:04 PM PDT by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sunshine Sister

Not as long as we have a Democrat/Rino congress...


39 posted on 05/11/2010 8:10:51 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
But the Liberal slant main stream media will right this off and spin it as bithers / conservatives grasping at straws and say that we are kooks ....
40 posted on 05/11/2010 8:14:24 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson