Posted on 05/11/2010 7:01:30 PM PDT by Man50D
Two private investigators working independently are asking why President Obama is using a Social Security number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state.
In addition, the records indicate the number was issued between 1977 and 1979, yet Obama's earliest employment reportedly was in 1975 at a Baskin & Robbins ice cream shop in Oahu, Hawaii.
WND has copies of affidavits filed separately in a presidential eligibility lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia by Ohio licensed private investigator Susan Daniels and Colorado private investigator John N. Sampson.
The investigators believe Obama needs to explain why he is using a Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants that was issued at a date later than he is known to have held employment.
The Social Security website confirms the first three numbers in his ID are reserved for applicants with Connecticut addresses, 040-049.
"Since 1973, Social Security numbers have been issued by our central office," the Social Security website explains. "The first three (3) digits of a person's social security number are determined by the ZIP code of the mailing address shown on the application for a social security number."
The question is being raised amid speculation about the president's history fueled by an extraordinary lack of public documentation. Along with his original birth certificate, Obama also has not released educational records, scholarly articles, passport documents, medical records, papers from his service in the Illinois state Senate, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and adoption papers.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Plus a few numbers of SP Freepers as well, AKA FINOs. I like your tag name, because that's really what we are!!!
Is that your true wishes???
SS numbers didn't come into effect until the FDR years, 1935 if I recall correctly.
Multiple names, = multiple S.S.#s, see post 112!!!
Yes, but a person born in 1890 would have been 45 in 1935 and would have been issued a card. I can state this with absolute authority as my grandmother (b. 1900) had a social security card issued in 1935, it came into my possession after her death.
The article doesn't state that the card was ISSUED in 1890, it states that the cardholder was BORN in 1890.
So my point still stands, for Obama to be using this number he would 1) have to be over 100 years old, or 2) its fraudulent.
Maybe the Cat needs a Kitten visit???
Not sure if you were being sarcastic but needing a SSN because he's a refugee or immigrant would pretty well prove Obama's ineligibility to be president wouldn't it?
Further clarification:
Since Social Security cards were not issued until FDR (who established the practice)....any dates ‘associated with a card’ previous to 1935 would be birth dates of the cardholder.
If you re-read my post, you will see that I WAS NOT DEPENDING ON THE LSM OR MSM. What my post says is, since the LSM will not publicize this story - as a previous poster stated - then use other media to spread the story, thereby further discrediting the LSM for burying it.
We can’t expect too many people to understand that it is SRM or Communist Media, yet. We need to show - and this story illustrates the fact - that they are hiding something like this on behalf of Obama. Oh, but you say it really isn’t anything at all, because you can explain his social security number being from Connecticut.
A good start.....now how about investigating the other 50 or so SS numbers that The Kenyan and the lovely Michelle have used?
Tht's NOT how it works!
If he ever applied for naturalization, (which I very much doubts he did,) he would automatic been issued a valid S.S. Card!!
That's his huge problem. If you are NOT a U.S. citizen or you don't have a valid "Green-Card" the only way is to make an identity theft, which is most likely he did!!!
Correct - but someone who was born in 1890 would only have been 45 years old if they applied when SS first started. If I understand the story correctly, the number that Obama is using was issued in Connecticut to someone who listed their birthdate as 1890 - it isn’t saying the number was issued in 1890.
However, I believe the records also show that Obama didn’t start using this number until he was in Chicago around 1986....at which time he had already (supposedly) attended Occidental and Columbia. So the question remains, what SSN was he using from 1975 - when he claims to have gotten his job at Baskin-Robbins in Honolulu - until 1986 when he started using this number.
Not sure when, if ever, someone in the state run media will get frustrated enough with the way they are being manipulated and actually start digging into some of these “irregularities”.
Checks out for me, as well as 3 of my children.
My wife is Arizona, and it checks out for her, too.
“Not sure when, if ever, someone in the state run media will get frustrated enough with the way they are being manipulated and actually start digging into some of these irregularities.”
They know full well what’s going on. They aren’t manipulated, they are part of it all................
I’m wondering when our “conservative” commentators like Rush and Beck will stop ignoring this. hmmmmmmmm?
Yeah, and how does this change the fact that a person born in 1890 was issued a card in 1936 or whenever?
And how exactly does it change that Obama using a number 'associated with 1890' (which would have to be a birthdate since there was no Soc. Sec. in 1890) means he's either 1) over age 100 or 2) committed fraud?
I read on the SSA site they have issued over 400 million SS numbers as of now.. The policy has always been never to reuse a number. They feel they can continue as is well into this century and beyond. Check the SSA FAQ’s at http://www.SSA.gov.
This story has been out there for months now.. WND until now has ignored it.
Close to a half of billion dollars for the first one and a quater+ billion dollars for the second one will easily seals their libs and their true principles are "sold" out at the back door, hmmm!!!
Sorry, lips!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.