Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kagan: Some speech can be 'disappeared'
wnd ^ | 5/10/10 | Aaron Klein

Posted on 05/10/2010 6:20:29 PM PDT by Nachum

NEW YORK – President Obama's nominee for the Supreme Court, Elena Kagan, argued certain forms of speech that promote "racial or gender inequality" could be "disappeared."

In her few academic papers, Kagan evidences strong beliefs for court intervention in speech, going so far as to posit First Amendment speech should be weighed against "societal costs.”

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: authoritarianism; disappeared; donttreadonme; fairnessdoctrine; fcc; gaygan; homosexualagenda; kagan; kagantruthfile; liberalfascism; localism; netneutrality; scotus; socialism; speech; totalitarianism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-144 next last
To: little jeremiah
Orrin from Utah was one of seven Republicans who voted to confirm Kagan as solicitor general.

They supported her before even though they knew she was “very liberal” according to Orrin.

121 posted on 05/11/2010 8:19:42 AM PDT by SQUID
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: investigateworld

;^)


122 posted on 05/11/2010 10:06:32 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows (Just another day in Oceania.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
There will be Republican senators voting no.

Consider the minefield:

As Rush says, she's just there to execute the Obama agenda--can Republicans say that?

You and I know she loathes and despises the Constitution--but a senator would never say that.

The media is wall to wall rooting for her because that's who they are.

Opposition to her will be immediately tagged anti-woman, anti-diversity--

The clear signal is Grassley pointing out she has no experience, no record, only a few writings.

We have seen with Obama how a stealth profile conceals dangerous destruction--we may compare them to Trojan horses.

And that didn't end well.

123 posted on 05/11/2010 12:55:38 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo

“The clear signal is Grassley pointing out she has no experience, no record, only a few writings. “

And the only case she had before SCOTUS, lost 8-0.

She can be stopped. Is there the will to do so?

I don’t know.


124 posted on 05/11/2010 1:05:46 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker; sickoflibs; Nachum; genetic homophobe; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; DoughtyOne; ..

Wow, oh man!!!! Stephenjohnbanker, You said “BORK” her...

For a terrible split second, I thought you said “PORK” her, and I was wretching over here in absolute horror...I mean, I’ve seen PLENTY of 2am Beauty Queens but uuggh!! I’d chew the arm off to get away from that one there...

(I know, I know, I’m crass, it’s a cheap shot, and probably in bad taste, but hey, at the end of the day, I’m a guy, and that’s one ugly BROAD!!!)

I’m sorry..was that wrong? Was that mean? Do I care?


125 posted on 05/11/2010 3:34:56 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: NFHale
hehehe...dude, shes a puffer, so not much pork gonna happen, unless it drips bacon grease in the carpet...

was that mean ???

126 posted on 05/11/2010 4:07:52 PM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: NFHale

“Wow, oh man!!!! Stephenjohnbanker, You said “BORK” her...

For a terrible split second, I thought you said “PORK” her “

That would cause anyone to shudder....

If I had to guess, there is no orifice to even do that ;-)


127 posted on 05/11/2010 4:17:05 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: NFHale

Eeeewwwwwwwwwwwwww...


128 posted on 05/11/2010 6:04:44 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Excusaholic: MeCain lost to Jr., RINO endorsements are flying, & you live at 2012 Denial Blvd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Hussein Obama has a boiling, seething hatred of freedom.

Like his father the devil, he wants humanity enslaved, and wants to destroy the truth. And like his father, Satan, he is in for a very rude awakening.


129 posted on 05/11/2010 6:20:48 PM PDT by Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears (Pray for our leaders: Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Is she gay, all the way? Or not?


130 posted on 05/11/2010 8:50:42 PM PDT by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive
Is she gay, all the way? Or not?

They already have some of her old contacts going public saying she is not... Which means she probably is. LOL

131 posted on 05/11/2010 8:52:41 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/37114.html


132 posted on 05/11/2010 9:05:35 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
Obama’s new litmus test is hatred of Free Speech.

More than a "hatred" of free speech. It is a frightening willingness to quash it -- along with the Constitution.

133 posted on 05/11/2010 9:07:15 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
Countries that disappear speech, disappear people.

The term "disappear" in this context is straight out of the primer of Dialectical Materialism.

I'd wager she's studied it. And approves of it.

134 posted on 05/11/2010 9:09:17 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal
“can be disappeared”? Who will write her opinions - a 5th grader?

It is a term that has roots in Stalinism and Dialectical Materialism.

Her use of the term says something about her.

135 posted on 05/11/2010 9:19:18 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Bingo ... and thereby says even more about the sonofabitch who believes she’s just what the SCOTUS needs. What an insult to the real Judges on that court.


136 posted on 05/11/2010 9:20:43 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo

Ouch! Gonna be needing some ice on that. LOL


137 posted on 05/12/2010 12:51:03 AM PDT by Seadog Bytes ("Smart Growth"... isn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
A testament of how our schools have failed America. The great American experiment i.e., freedom, justice, liberty, etc. has for decades been thrown out the window in favor of radical thought with no thought to how it destroys.

Kagan is not fit for a seat on our Supreme Court.....she fits in more with the Attorney General.

138 posted on 05/12/2010 7:32:21 AM PDT by yoe (The "N" word stands for NO...as in NO MORE VOTES FOR IRRESPONSIBLE CONGRESSMEN OR SENATORS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; stephenjohnbanker; Gilbo_3; hiredhand; Squantos; sickoflibs

Some interesting tidbits on this fascist b*tch regarding our gun rights...

“We are taking the law and bending it as far as we can to capture a whole new class of guns.” Kagan wrote the Clinton ban on gun imports.

http://volokh.com/2010/05/11/were-bending-the-law-as-far-as-we-can-to-ban-an-entirely-new-class-of-guns-kagan-wrote-the-clinton-ban-on-gun-imports/

Man, these freaks never give up...


139 posted on 05/12/2010 8:42:55 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: NFHale

That’s why they are freaks.


140 posted on 05/12/2010 9:18:01 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson