the Israelis bulldoze the family houses of bombers...
Posted on 05/08/2010 4:23:49 PM PDT by Cindy
07 May 2010
ENEMIES, BOTH FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC
By A. Aaron Weisburd
SNIPPET: "If nothing else, I would hope that the Times Square attack of 01 May 2010 highlights the problematic nature of efforts to categorize terrorism as either foreign or domestic. In the end all terrorism is local, regardless of the terrorist, his cause, his ideology, his religion, his place of birth, where he was raised, etc. The threat is not either foreign or domestic, it is both foreign and domestic."
(Excerpt) Read more at internet-haganah.com ...
“Internet Haganah?”
Wasn’t the Haganah, like the Irgun, a bunch of terrorists, running around blowing things up?
The oligarchic enemies within more than equal the enemies without.
Together . . . God have mercy on us.
SOFIR.org
http://www.sofir.org
http://internet-haganah.com/harchives/006713.html
27 December 2009
“WHAT IS INTERNET HAGANAH?”
1. The author suggests that terroism today could come from any demographic sector. While technically true, the fact of the matter is that 99% of it is coming from one religion and only several nationalities - not from agnostic Swedes.
2. Terrorists have nothing to fear if caught. If they die, they die as martyrs or at worst, spend time in one of our Federal pens as heroes to the folks back home. And they get lots of press coverage locally and globally (which these guys typically crave) - even the author of the post was impressed with the bombers performance (see above quote).
In days of old (say the Roman Empire), all near and far relatives of such a person would be put to the sword as a warning to would be misdoers.
German occupying forces would shoot 10 - 50 civilians for every German soldier killed by the underground.
I know we don't want to do that (well maybe we do, but can't in todays society), but we got to find what is really dear to this dickheads and set a few examples.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2491072/posts
#
Re: most of the terrorism...
I’m sure the author understands that, riodcat.
Hey, we could always give the perps the experience of their worst fears before dispatching them, whether or not we actually carry out the real life events. (See Jack Bauer’s handbook)
the Israelis bulldoze the family houses of bombers...
The SOL were a bunch of thugs. Thank G-d for them and Sam Adams.
barbra ann
Catchy theme...
1. Haganah was the Left eager to passify the Brits and use the political process
2. The Irgun is comparable to the Militias in the US Revolutionary War. Were they “terrorists?”
Your point of view on the Irgun resembles the Brits point of view on the Militias.
[You, lying] No.
Not true.
When Caesar had to hide from the proscriptions of Sulla as a young man, his family was not molested. His mother Aurelia and her brothers the Aurelii Cottae, although the Aurelii had been supporters of Marius, were untouched.
When the Second Triumvirate (specifically Mark Antony) put Cicero to death, his son Marcus was passed over and spared, while Cicero's brother Quintus, who'd been a legate of Caesar's, and Quintus's son Quintus, were both executed. But the slave who betrayed them both was complaisantly identified by Sulla's men to Quintus's wife Pomponia (the sister of Atticus, Marcus Cicero's great friend and brother-in-law), who presided over the slave's grisly death: she forced him to cut chunks off himself, cook them up at table, and eat them, in a scene that probably inspired the Ray Liotta payoff scene in Hannibal.
It wasn't all one way or another; the Romans didn't know what totalitarianism was, until Diocletian imported its principia from Egyptian temple practice in about 305.
Sounds familiar....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.