Posted on 04/20/2010 8:02:29 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
The defense attorney for an officer refusing Army orders until Barack Obama documents his eligibility to be commander in chief has hinted that the president's proof of eligibility could come up during the course of the government's prosecution of his client.
"In the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice), just as you would expect, criminal defendants have the process of the court, for subpoenas and depositions under the rules that are prescribed," attorney Paul Jensen said during an interview today on the radio show of G. Gordon Liddy.
Jensen was on the program with his client, Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, who posted a YouTube video inviting his own court-martial because he believes military orders under an ineligible president are illegal, and then posted a letter telling Obama that it's up to him to provide the proof.
"I'm not going to say what we are going to do other than we are going to do what you would want us to do," Jensen said.
He specifically avoided broadcasting any specific defense strategy for the case that is developing against Lakin – confirming that the officer was told in writing on Monday that he now has been "flagged" by the military and charges are expected to be filed soon.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Well...
That makes about as much sense as any other theory, I guess.
Man the first time I heard that it was a tire salesman in a Durham NC Goodyear store describing his opinion of Tom Burleson as a freshman at NC St. Three years later Burleson helped NC State end UCLA’s run of championships and win the NCAA. That salesman was wrong and so are you. Besides walking and chewing gum I can think and chew gum at the same time.
Then you should allow that others can multitask.
Of course a lower court has to pick it up first. But the issue still remains. If it is going to be decided in court, the US Supreme Court will have the final answer. If such a case exists that can prove what so many people believe it should, it will end up with the US Supreme Court. They would just take it from a lower court, if need be.
If such a case exists it will have a much bigger impact on the nation than Bush vs. Gore ever did.
And unfortunately, our nation is being put to the test in the process.
I don’t give these people, as you call them, anywhere near that much credit. Obama is losing in late Sept when the economy tanked.He’s succeeded in mobilizing a vast segment of the American people to oppose him and his policies. He’s facing electoral catastrophe in November. Not exactly an irresitible force.
The first resonably non insulting thing you’ve said.
1)The announcement is not specific
2) it was, apparently, something phoned in rather than posted by a hospital.
3) There were obvious advantages in establishing that a young American woman’s child was born in the country, especially since his father was not an American.
Now, as far as I am concerned, he may well have been born in Oahu, but that that “long form” birth certificate might contain information that discredits Obama’s published biography. Maybe Obama was not the father. Maybe Stanley Ann was not the mother? Maybe the father was not identified? Who knows. But until the documents are shown, we don’t know.
As for the COLB that has been published? I don’t accept this as proof. My own COLB is not factual. My adoptive parents are listed as my natural parents because this is the way they did it in my state. The actual birth certificate is either buried in court files or—since record keeping was pretty loose—simply no longer exists.
COLB is not factual.
A coup de Main. Well, you are right. The whole establishment just brushed aside
the question of eligibility before the election, because the truth is irrelevant to their needs.
“Someone please explain again why the (2) newspaper birth announcements do not lend credibility to Obama’s American birth? I am at a loss to understand how these could be fradulent, planted or anticipatory of baby Obama’s future presidency.”
The newpaper announcement does lend credibility, but it is far from establishing anything beyond a reasonable doubt.
A future presidency is not the only reason to want your child or grandchild to be an American citizen. My local paper in the 1960’s would print an announcement submitted and no proof of anything was needed.
Personally, I think there is something Obama is hiding about his birth certificate and vital statistics, but it is not necessarily his birthplace.
I don’t believe he is a natural born citizen because his father was not a US citizen(both parents should be), and that appears to be what the framers of the constitution meant by NBC, although that is far from settled either.
Thanks. Do you want the HTML for it? You can save it in a word doc and post it when you want to.
I would go further..cough up all the secreted documents..school records, all of it. If he doesn’t he has something to hide..Then we could hope some intel agency could ferret out the dope and rope him with it.
We don’t know that he was legally adopted by Soetoro. I don’t necessarily believe that gramps was dad but it’s an interesting theory and is possible. It always seemed off to me that his mom held her daughter closely, but has no problem shipping black Barry off to live with and be raised by his grandparents. I’m not buying the story that she wanted him to have a good education for one second. If that was the case, she would have done the say with his sister. I also find it odd that Barry was shipped home the same year that FMD was divorced and his wife moved out. There are so many possibilities. Take your pick and choose the one that most match the real facts and relevant known circumstantial evidence:
1. Anne and Sr. were the parents and he was born in Hawaii
2. Anne and Sr. were the parents and he was born elsewhere.
3. Anne adopted him, she doesn’t know who the father is.
4. He was grandmas son as the result of a 3 way with gramps and FMD.
5. He was the fathered by gramps and the mother was the black bar tender in the black bar that he frequented(the one Barry talks about in Dreams)
6. Anne didn’t have a clue which black guy in Seattle is the father of Barry but that makes no sense to me, why would Sr. give him his name? Sr. would most likely only give him his name if he were indeed his son, OR to cover for FMD.
I think Gramps and Anne are involved because the first time I saw their photos I immediately thought he favored them. The long chin, like the Jay Leno chin is a dominant trait.
Yes it would but I doubt it will be of any suprise to most people by the time it does.
And unfortunately, our nation is being put to the test in the process.
The fools in this country would have brought us to that point and it would be a good time as any to face reality. Ands it may finally put to rest the crazy idea of being too big to fail... The liberals can face the mantra they spoke of "No one [or man] is above the law" they spouted during the final days of Nixon.
>Then we could hope some intel agency could ferret out the dope and rope him with it.<
.
All intel on Obama was already ferreted out the moment he decided to run for POTUS. Why it was never published is something we will find out in time.
The military can not be compared to a private corporation.
Lying on your resume for a job is a tad different than committing fraud the for position of President. Treason. Whether or not BamBam’s laws would be made null and void would be a political issue, most likely. It would be hard for the parties who protected Obama fraud to argue we should live under the laws signed by a treasonous President.
If Obama is found not to be legally in the white house, I want all of those involved up for treason for abetting Obama’s crime. That is why they are all so desparate to cover up what they have done to the American people and our constitution.
I tend to agree, as the Clinton's are the masters of character assassination (not to say that I won't cheer those who challenge BOs eligibility - "something just ain't right there").
Best of luck on your biopsy.
God bless...
I hope your tests is as negative as it can be.
SC didn’t have a popular vote for president until Reconstruction; from 1832 to 1860 it was the only state still to have it’s state legislature elect its presidential electors.
I don’t think he’s an irresistable force now. But being the “first black” president, with the Mouthpiece Media wetting themselves over him, no one, not even the Clintons, wanted to be the ones to point out any facts. McCain either. I can only assume there were decisions made behind the scenes to lay off the topic.
Sure, freepmail it to me, thank you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.