Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

You Have the Right to Remain Silent (LT Colonel Lakin Read His Rights)
Safe Guard Our Constitution ^

Posted on 04/13/2010 8:19:14 AM PDT by Man50D

Washington, D.C., April 13, 2010. Army doctor Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin yesterday met with his brigade commander, Col. Gordon R. Roberts, who proceeded to read LTC Lakin his Miranda rights, and who informed LTC Lakin he had the “right to remain silent” because LTC Lakin is about to be charged with serious crimes. Col. Roberts was at age 19 awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor, the only recipient of the nation’s highest honor currently on active duty in the Army.

LTC Lakin had previously been ordered in writing to report yesterday to Ft. Campbell, KY and then on to deploy for his second tour of duty in Afghanistan. Lakin refused to obey these orders and instead came to work yesterday morning at the Pentagon. Late yesterday afternoon he was confronted by his brigade commander.

Before the meeting was over, LTC Lakin’s Pentagon Access Pass had been revoked, and his laptop computer was set to be confiscated.

The message to LTC Lakin is clear; through official channels, he was informed yesterday that he will shortly be court-martialled for crimes (specifically, missing movement and conduct unbecoming an officer) that for others has led to lengthy imprisonment at hard labor.

Lakin has announced in a YouTube video that has now been viewed more than 110,000 times that he considers it his duty to refuse to obey orders that would be illegal if President Obama is ineligible to hold office.

Meanwhile, cries mount for proof of that eligibility, but nothing has been forthcoming. The Obama campaign at one point released a copy of computer-generated abstract of information purportedly in Hawaii's records system, but the source of this information is unclear and need not have been a birth certificate issued contemporaneously and signed by the doctor who attended the birth. Even the document released was only a copy, and the version printed in the Los Angeles Times on June 16, 2008 is on a form only in use since late 2001. Even as it is, the document contains a warning that it is merely “prima facie”--threshold, rebuttable and thus inconclusive --evidence of birth, and the copy the Times printed mysteriously has the certificate number blacked out, thereby rendering the document unusable according to language on the bottom.

Given the seriousness of the offenses with which LTC Lakin is about to be charged, the American Patriot Foundation today renewed its plea for donations to its legal defense fund for LTC Lakin. Details are available at APF's website, www.safeguardourconstitution.com


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: army; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; lakin; military; naturalborncitizen; obama; terrencelakin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 1,241-1,248 next last
To: onyx; penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; ...

~~And so it goes forward. God bless and
protect LTC Lakin.


281 posted on 04/13/2010 11:39:43 AM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
Welcome to the party. Did you bring the pizza?
282 posted on 04/13/2010 11:40:49 AM PDT by verity (Obama Lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

“The prosecution needs to prove there isn’t a God, so how could he possibly talk to him. “

Incorrect. If someone makes an incredible claim as part of their defense, then they need to show it is believable.

Since Obama has been certified by every possible authority as President, it would be up to Lakin to prove Obama is a fraud. Otherwise, the court will assume Obama is President.


283 posted on 04/13/2010 11:41:21 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
So you are stuck with the fact that your definition is wrong.

If it is, then so is the definition of the 100 Senators who signed McCain's SR511, and 200 years of Presidential elections and the words of multiple Supreme Court Justices -- NONE of whom you can quote to the contrary.

284 posted on 04/13/2010 11:41:49 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: Getsmart64
"Now wait a sec.....the Electoral College was calling Obama the winner in States where less than half the vote was counted with no clear winner...so don't go there with the electoral college BS..."

True dat but the killer part of the equation is once the Speaker certifies the election in essence even if a three legged dog was certified as President the deed is done and you will be calling the dog Mr. President.

The Process creates a "Catch 22" he may not have been eligible but it don't matter because he is!

HOWEVER! It does not mean he cannot be stopped from running for reelection!

285 posted on 04/13/2010 11:42:31 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the next one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
Well, everyone with a role in determining eligibility disagrees with you. 50 states. Congress. The American people.

Nobody had a role in determining eligibility. This a false assumption on your part. When Obama's name was put on ballots, at most he signed some affadavits declaring he was eligible. Nobody is charged with checking to see if the declaration was truthful. The American people sure as hell didn't determine his eligiblity. Terrible reply, Rogers. Terrible.

286 posted on 04/13/2010 11:42:46 AM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727
I am not a JAG. See how simple that was?
287 posted on 04/13/2010 11:43:35 AM PDT by verity (Obama Lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Getsmart64

The General Election was held November 4th, 2008. The Electoral College met on December 15th, 2008 to cast their votes for POTUS.

Are you suggesting that more than a month after the general elections there were still states in which the votes had not been fully counted and certified by the Secretaries of State?


288 posted on 04/13/2010 11:44:28 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg; Don Corleone
MoH's aren't handed out like Cracker Jack treats or Nobel Peace prizes. This is no sadsack soldier this is someone who was awarded the highest praise the Government has to offer a member of the Military.

It was actually kind of the stupidest play that Obama and the military could have made.

They should have transferred Lakin to another commander BEFORE they had to have MoH recipient Roberts read him his rights.

As it now stands, we know for a fact that we have a standing army whose senior commanders will unquestioningly obey orders, lawful or not, to shoot down American citizens who the politicians perceive as threats to their power. That includes guys who have been awarded the MoH.

Lakin has done the country a tremendous service by spotlighting this small fact.

289 posted on 04/13/2010 11:46:41 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Watching the MSM with Obama is like watching Joslyn James with Tiger Woods)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
Obama doesn’t have to prove his eligibility because the state of Hawaii has verified his birth records:

When you make a claim, it helps to post a quote that supports your claim. Nothing in what you posted says his birth records were verified. At best, it is an admission that his original birth certificate was insufficient to prove a claim of birthplace. Whatever other vital records are being cited need to be documented to carry any legal weight.

Obama’s political opponents have to prove his ineligibility and neither John McCain, Sarah Palin nor the Republican National Committee has legally challenged his eligibility nor have they filed an amicus brief in support of any eligibility lawsuit.

No opponent has to prove ineligibility. All we have to prove is that his claim of eligibility is inconclusive and that's easy. It remains Obama's burden to prove he is eligible.

290 posted on 04/13/2010 11:47:15 AM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Of course not because it would be clear she was not eligible. But of course if she lied and got away with it....no problem.


291 posted on 04/13/2010 11:47:51 AM PDT by GregNH (Re-Elect "No Body")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: parsifal

You’re killing the buzz.


292 posted on 04/13/2010 11:49:07 AM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Perhaps it would be more apt to state that those in the Government have questioned his qualifications publicly.


Congressman Nathan Deal (R-GA)
http://rawstory.com/2010/02/gop-rep-deal-insists-birth-certificate-question-knock-obamas-legitimacy/

Dr. Alan Keyes

Former Congressman J.D. Hayworth

Rep. Eric Swafford
http://politics.nashvillepost.com/2009/02/10/rep-eric-swafford-joins-the-obama-presidential-eligibility-fight/

The list is growing...but you only asked for ONE...

IMO in November, those who refuse to question Obama’s qualifications to be POTUS, will be replaced by those that will..but time will tell.


293 posted on 04/13/2010 11:49:12 AM PDT by etraveler13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: BP2

For your edification:

“I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter.”


294 posted on 04/13/2010 11:49:25 AM PDT by verity (Obama Lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
No, McCain’s SR511 has nothing to do with Obama’s eligibility.

It has everything to do with the definition of "natural born citizen" that these 100 Senators and their staffers accepted as fact, acknowledging that both parents had to be U.S. citizens at the birth of the child in order for that child to be a natural born citizen.

295 posted on 04/13/2010 11:49:41 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
Always knew that you were a mouth-breathing idiot, N-S, but this statement takes the cake.

Time will tell who the idiot is.

296 posted on 04/13/2010 11:50:05 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: parsifal

Do you think he thinks that the representatives from the Electoral College call in to Shep Smith at Fox News and cast their votes with 47% of precincts reporting?


297 posted on 04/13/2010 11:50:12 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

“Col. Roberts was at age 19 awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor, the only recipient of the nation’s highest honor currently on active duty in the Army.”

“And somehow this is relevant...why?”

What it means is that Lakin is going to a court martial, having disobeyed an order from a CMH recipient.

He’s going to have to defend that to a military jury. He won’t be able to.


298 posted on 04/13/2010 11:50:17 AM PDT by pacowaco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
If he loses his liberties it's going to be because of violations of Article 87 and Article 133 if the story is correct. I imagine there may be others.

You must be delighted.
299 posted on 04/13/2010 11:51:04 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Getsmart64
Article 87...there is no doubt he missed his deployment...the question of why he missed his deployment doesn't matter....now the Article 133.....that's where all the fun is going to be had....

Conduct unbecoming? That's relatively minor, it's the missing movement that will cost him his career.

300 posted on 04/13/2010 11:52:30 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 1,241-1,248 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson