Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US court rules against FCC on `net neutrality'
AP via Yahoo! News ^ | April 6, 2010 | AP

Posted on 04/06/2010 7:59:11 AM PDT by kosciusko51

On Tuesday April 6, 2010, 10:38 am

WASHINGTON (AP) -- A federal appeals court has ruled that the Federal Communications Commission lacks the authority to require broadband providers to give equal treatment to all Internet traffic flowing over their networks.

(Excerpt) Read more at finance.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: comcast; fcc; lping; netneutrality; scotus; verizon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: kosciusko51
Because the FCC "has failed to tie its assertion" of regulatory authority to any actual law enacted by Congress, the agency does not have the authority to regulate an Internet provider's network management practices, wrote Judge David Tatel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

Somebody reading the constitution?

61 posted on 04/06/2010 11:06:59 AM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51

Just the beginning of many judicial smack downs to come for Zero!


62 posted on 04/06/2010 11:12:24 AM PDT by TheStickman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

This government or admdinistration has been acting outside the law since they came into power or rather “seized power” as one of the Czars so aptly put it. This kind of ilk won’t rest until they can silence any and all opposition. It will be up to THE PEOPLE to stop them. CO


63 posted on 04/06/2010 11:31:11 AM PDT by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what medicine is to a wound - HEALING!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Art in Idaho

I have NO doubt he’s a COMMUNIST. None. CO


64 posted on 04/06/2010 11:32:49 AM PDT by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what medicine is to a wound - HEALING!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51

Yay!


65 posted on 04/06/2010 11:33:45 AM PDT by Snerdley (You can put a Suit on a Community Organizer, but it's still an EMPTY SUIT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheLeftCoast

If they have to vote on it I would be curious to see how it splits out. Plenty of Dems get $$$ from telco workers unions


66 posted on 04/06/2010 11:45:51 AM PDT by misterrob (Have you tea bagged a liberal today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51
Drudge's headline and image on this are priceless!

COURT: NO INTERNET CONTROL FOR

FCC; BLOW TO JULIUS, REGULATION,

RULES

67 posted on 04/06/2010 11:51:57 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51
Very, very good news.

The backbone providers are NOT a collective entity. They're in business to make money.

If further law/regulation succeeds in some other form of "net neutrality", the big backbone provider should just turn off their routers and fiber repeaters.

First for an hour a day...increasing each day until they reach 24hrs.

68 posted on 04/06/2010 12:03:24 PM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51

http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/451139-Network_Neutrality_Supporters_Back_FCC_After_Court_of_Appeals_Decision.php

Network Neutrality Supporters Back FCC After Court of Appeals Decision
Sen. Kerry looks for ways to make commission’s authority over Internet clear
By John Eggerton — Broadcasting & Cable, 4/6/2010 1:46:38 PM


69 posted on 04/06/2010 12:22:33 PM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51

OOOHRAH! SMOKE ‘EM IF YOU GOT ‘EM.


70 posted on 04/06/2010 12:33:20 PM PDT by CharlesThe Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51

So the FCC wants to regulate the internet in such a way that over time, they’ll become the only internet provider in America?

The Founders fought for less.


71 posted on 04/06/2010 1:30:23 PM PDT by wastedyears (The Founders revolted for less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51

Who would have thought that a government agency set up to regulate something would turn into a tool of tyranny?

I mean, that is so uncommon throughout human history.

YES, this is sarcasm! And I don’t care if you think the FCC is “for the children”.


72 posted on 04/06/2010 2:11:41 PM PDT by MichiganConservative (A government big enough to do unto the people you don't like will get to doing unto you soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce; MizSterious
“Did you catch the news yesterday about Chavez arresting judges who didn’t rule his way?”

Good thing this is America. Cause, you know, we're free. Free to choose Bud Lite or Miller Lite and watch UFC or pro wrestling. Nothing more to freedom than that. Especially if the government taxes you at 80% to give you all they think you need in life. Bad things just can't happen here! We're special!

73 posted on 04/06/2010 2:15:37 PM PDT by MichiganConservative (A government big enough to do unto the people you don't like will get to doing unto you soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave; ShadowAce; AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; ...
A federal appeals court has ruled that the Federal Communications Commission lacks the authority to require broadband providers to give equal treatment to all Internet traffic flowing over their networks.

74 posted on 04/06/2010 3:17:37 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
If further law/regulation succeeds in some other form of "net neutrality", the big backbone provider should just turn off their routers and fiber repeaters.
First for an hour a day...increasing each day until they reach 24hrs.

Yep. Roger that.

The commies need to figure out the internet controls everything and the folks that control internet should not be pizzed off. If the backbones are shut off you can't buy gas, groceries, go eat at a restaurant etc and pay with a credit card. Cash only. No big deal, just go to an ATM, right? Guess again. ATM = internet connection.

Try something a bit bigger... metropolitan traffic controls. Yea, the mother of all traffic jams.

Manufacturing? Nope. JIT manufacturing communicates on internet connections.

Transportation and trucking? Nope. 18 wheelers gotta buy fuel and that means satellite uplinks to... internet.

Now, try something even bigger, electric grid. Uh-huh, many of the sub-stations and switching stations talk to each other via... internet.

Yep. SkyNet without guns, "because they don't need them."

75 posted on 04/06/2010 3:30:24 PM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: TLI
It's for the reasons you cite that the US Congress will not be able to resist "regulation".

Still, the National Communications Infrastructure honcho's at DCA COULD seize all "telecommunications assets" in a "National Emergency".

Alas, if I were AT&T, Verizon, Sprint et al, I'd be looking to SELL the assets. The best they'll be able to do over the long-term is a 12% rate of return...just like the old ma Bell.

76 posted on 04/06/2010 3:39:33 PM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51

This is a kick in the balls for leftist Genochockfullofnuts, whose chief spokeswoman is a communist from Robert McChesney’s group “Freepress”.

Let’s see what Geno does next, which will probably be illegal and anti-American.


77 posted on 04/06/2010 4:19:24 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Mayb Zero should offer to lift the non existent ban on the Internet in exchange for a partial ban, and complete control.

Dumb asses. And I’m talking about the R’s.


78 posted on 04/06/2010 4:30:19 PM PDT by Jimmah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: eleni121

No, they won’t. they will just come up with another scheme to try to silence their political enemies using the power of the federal government.


79 posted on 04/06/2010 5:14:38 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The US will not die with a whimper. It will die with thundering applause from the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51

Will the Lawless Congress try to overrule this decision?


80 posted on 04/06/2010 6:22:28 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson