Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Ominous ‘S-Word’ – Secession
Big Government ^ | 3-31-10 | Timothy H. Lee

Posted on 03/31/2010 6:36:03 AM PDT by kingattax

After 230 years, are the American people coursing toward eventual divorce?

Our polarized society increasingly ponders what would happen if American conservatives and liberals simply agreed that their differences had become irreconcilable, and redivided the nation to go their separate ways.

Which side would prosper and experience an influx of migration from the other? Conversely, which side would likely become a fiscal and socio-political basket case?

Any reasonable person already knows the likely answer. One need only compare the smoldering wreckage wrought by liberal governance in such states as California or Michigan with the comparative prosperity created by conservative governance in such states as Texas or Utah.

We can also examine the past 400 years, during which immigrants abandoned Europe for an America founded upon the fundamental principles of limited government and individual freedom.

(Excerpt) Read more at biggovernment.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cwii; cwiiping; donttreadonme; secession
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-266 next last
To: MrB

“It’s truly about slavery this time.

Our slavery to the state.”

That’s all it is.


121 posted on 03/31/2010 9:44:31 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
"...other than the slaveholding States or Territories of the United States of America..."

I read that to prohibit import from Africa; do you have any historical references to suggest otherwise, other than subtle nuances of timing over what state was part of which alliance at what time?

122 posted on 03/31/2010 9:46:04 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
Archy has suggested the model for an American CWII event is something more like 'the dirty wars' of Argentina and Chille ...

That is, to the best of my understanding, what happened in this country in the aftermath of the Rev War.

Loyalists either sat down and shut up (if they hadn't pissed-off the neighbors too badly), or moved to Canada/England.

123 posted on 03/31/2010 9:49:19 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP

Unless we worked out a deal with Vancouver, BC and the Canadian-Pacific railway.


124 posted on 03/31/2010 9:52:26 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

“However, it could never properly rule on whether THE RIGHT TO SECESSION is legal, since it is a natural right.”

“Then call it what is it, a God given right to rebel and change your government. Don’t pretend it’s legal and try to cloak it in the rule of law.”

Natural rights become the basis for law.


125 posted on 03/31/2010 9:54:28 AM PDT by Nabber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
There is no reason why secession, should it come to the U.S., shouldn't be accomplished in the same peaceful manner so long as it is done with agreement of both sides, those leaving and those staying.

I hope it does not come to that, but do you suupose it could be agreed upon by both sides here? If it did, what would stop the liberal side from becoming more conservative, and vice versa? If this happens, would they all be back to square one?

126 posted on 03/31/2010 9:58:31 AM PDT by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
I read that to prohibit import from Africa; do you have any historical references to suggest otherwise, other than subtle nuances of timing over what state was part of which alliance at what time?

The claim was made that the confederate constitution specifically prohibited slave imports. It did not. In theory slave imports from Africa and countries other than the U.S. were banned. In practice they almost certainly would have continued, as they did prior to the rebellion.

127 posted on 03/31/2010 10:01:06 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Yes, I was just thinking. thanks


128 posted on 03/31/2010 10:09:51 AM PDT by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: AzaleaCity5691

Then the first thing you will have to do is Nationalize those oil fields to get the thieving Yankee’s hands off your resources.

I doubt if Gas in Chicago would go up to $20 a gallon but it certainly would go up a little. Don´t forget the rest of America will need less having got rid of several states.


129 posted on 03/31/2010 10:11:15 AM PDT by Cardhu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Nabber
Natural rights become the basis for law.

So the government has no right to put down any rebellion or insurrection, since all the rebels have to do is announce "we're exerting our natural rights."

130 posted on 03/31/2010 10:11:28 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

I also believe that we are coming to “S” -— because I for one will live free or die, and I know I am not alone.

I may be 100% wrong, but I do not think that the federal government can set the military against the citizens now, either, because the military ain’t stupid and they as individuals see what is going on as well.

I see the left and the right as so diametrically opposite that I can’t imagine any compromise between the two.

Either you approve of killing the preborn, or you oppose it -— there is no middle ground, alive is alive, and dead is dead, period!

Either there is personal responsibility and decisions have consequences, or there is a cradle to grave government safety net without accountability.

Either you are a law abiding individual who wants just laws that are equally enforced across the board, or you are a lawless individual who only wants the laws enforced against people you don’t like and don’t agree with, while giving a pass to certain “protected classes”.

I could go on and on, but the divisions are as stark as binary code -— you are either -0- or -1-, either “yes” or “no” -— there is no “other” or middle choice on so many issues, fronts, and choices ———>

IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES.


131 posted on 03/31/2010 10:23:56 AM PDT by LTC.Ret (I know I am a racist, but . . . . I didn't spend 31 years in the Army to see my USA turn socialist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

the CSA should never have attacked Fort Sumter or the supply ships. How well do you think Castro would have done if they decided to attack Gitmo.

the cedeing back of USA forts to Southern States would have happened eventually over the course of decades....there was no need to attack.


132 posted on 03/31/2010 10:29:44 AM PDT by Vaquero (BHO....'The Pretenda from Kenya')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

I am all for dividing the country - north and south. We are so divided already. The south keeps the military.


133 posted on 03/31/2010 10:36:35 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
This defeatist attitude has got to go. Just because your opponents decide to play hardball doesn’t mean you take your glove and go home. Does the Constitution mean anything to us? or is it OK if some twit uses it for TP? Lose the “secession” talk. Focus on restoring what we still have, not tearing it apart because someone doesn’t play by the rules.

How will you feel when our newest citizens are granted the vote following amnesty, thus pretty much guaranteeing a democratic party majority for the foreseeable future?

134 posted on 03/31/2010 10:39:21 AM PDT by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
This right of secession was NEVER determined to be either legal or illegal by any court of law.

There's a reason it hasn't been determined legally. Justice Antonin Scalia writes:

135 posted on 03/31/2010 10:40:24 AM PDT by Dan Nunn (Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise. -The Great One)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: STONEWALLS
...tribal wars of secession and partition are being fought all around the globe...in time they will come here too...see Thomas Chittum’s “Civil War Two: The Coming Breakup of America” http://www.resist.com/CWII.pdf

Unfortunately due to demographics, the South (and especially Texas) are probably the worst place to be. Virginia and North Carolina going blue last election are just the beginning. Any secession there would be pointless as they would be right back to where they started if not worse in a generation or two.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maps_of_American_ancestries

But on the flip side, if secession talk ever got really serious, the economy and dollar would collapse and all these liberal "groups" would then turn on each other in one big bloodbath first.

136 posted on 03/31/2010 10:43:30 AM PDT by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LTC.Ret

I couldn’t have said it better.


137 posted on 03/31/2010 10:43:51 AM PDT by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher

I’d consider dual citizenship. LOL


138 posted on 03/31/2010 10:46:54 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
Unless we worked out a deal with Vancouver, BC and the Canadian-Pacific railway.

True, but you still would have to deal with a foreign country. And Canada is politically much closer to the libs than they are to the conservatives. My point was that any breakup is going to have some down sides. In fact for it to be peaceful the other side must perceive that they are getting something out of the breakup. As i pointed out in my earlier post one of the main reasons that CWI went from negotiated secession to shooting wars was because the Confederacy offered the Union absolutely nothing to sweeten the deal. One of the keys to a peaceful breakup might be that we provide the blue zones with cheap natural gas. Much like part of the deal for Ukraine to be exit the USSR was that they had to allow the pipelines from Russia to Europe to pass through their territory, and limited their ability to tax the gas flowing through them. There is a difference between "I'm leaving" and "I'm leaving and taking the car and the furniture with me".
139 posted on 03/31/2010 10:49:48 AM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

I’m beyond pondering. I’m ready to get started.

Imagine...
* No IRS
* Fewer federal mandates.
* God and prayer welcome in the public square again.
* No ACLU
* A pro-business, pro-capitalist environment that champions growth, jobs and wealth.
* Common-sense care of the environment minus the extremism of zealots.
* Serious attempts to control our borders, not mere lip service.

IMO, Washington is broken, the welfare state is broken and the premises of some Supreme Court decisions has damaged some of the principles of the Constitution beyond repair. We need to start over but we need to create a worldview where the welfare/freeloader class doesn’t have the same voting strength as the working/investing/producing class.

I believe this can be done and as the America we used to love slides deeper into debt and socialism, right-thinking people need to break free from it before it sucks us all under.


140 posted on 03/31/2010 10:50:53 AM PDT by OrangeHoof ("Barack Obama" is Swahili for "Bend over suckahs".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-266 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson