Are you KIDDING me, Cornyn?? "pre-existing conditions" is NON-CONTROVERSIAL???????????
THEN IT ISN'T INSURANCE!
That is utter ignorance, is it not???????
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
To: Recovering_Democrat
Do you really expect better from our pack of RINO “leaders?”
2 posted on
03/23/2010 2:10:44 PM PDT by
DemonDeac
To: Recovering_Democrat
My point: not allowing insurance companies to ASSESS RISK is taking away insurance company’s main function. Someone tell me why I’m wrong...I don’t think I am.
To: Recovering_Democrat
Cornyn is another RINO like McCain. They need to defund it.
4 posted on
03/23/2010 2:10:59 PM PDT by
Frantzie
(TV - sending Americans towards Islamic serfdom - Cancel TV service NOW)
To: Recovering_Democrat
When will there be a conservative party in the United States? Were the Whigs the end of that?
5 posted on
03/23/2010 2:11:26 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(If we're an Empire, why are Cuba, Iraq, the Philippines, Japan & Germany independent?)
To: Recovering_Democrat
Didn’t take them long to go wobbly
6 posted on
03/23/2010 2:11:48 PM PDT by
wardaddy
(trouble is coming)
To: Recovering_Democrat
With armed IRS agents at your door to collect your mandated premium its a tax more than insurance.
To: Recovering_Democrat
So what will they run on?
You better pull your head out RINO....
9 posted on
03/23/2010 2:13:03 PM PDT by
Brett66
(Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: Recovering_Democrat
pre-existing conditions it the fundamental economic problem of the whole bill. It eliminates the entire model for health insurance, will bankrupt the companies, and raise the hell out of all our rates. WTF is wrong with this turdbrained idiot?
The solution is to offer tax incentives for individual purchase and phase out the employee/provider model. That ends the pre-existing condition problem 100%.
10 posted on
03/23/2010 2:13:17 PM PDT by
ilgipper
To: Recovering_Democrat
Cornyn is from Texas? Ick.
11 posted on
03/23/2010 2:13:18 PM PDT by
Jewbacca
(The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
To: Recovering_Democrat
Doesn't surprise me at all. As head of the NRSC, Cornyn was backing Specter over Toomey right up until Specter's jump, and in CA he threw his support to Fiorina when Larry Elder came offering to run against Boxer.
12 posted on
03/23/2010 2:13:25 PM PDT by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Recovering_Democrat
I agree with you, his statement regarding pre-existing conditions is utter ignorance.
We need better representatives on our side who can understand and explain conservative principles.
To: Recovering_Democrat
Cornyn is a vile disgusting little vermin.............
14 posted on
03/23/2010 2:14:13 PM PDT by
rrrod
To: Recovering_Democrat
All you need to know about Cornyn is that he endorsed Charlie Crist over Marco Rubio in the Florida primary. Everything he says after that is pretty worthless!
15 posted on
03/23/2010 2:14:19 PM PDT by
PhiKapMom
(Mary Fallin - OK Gov/Rick Perry - TX Gov/Coburn/Rubio - Senate 2010 !)
To: Recovering_Democrat
Rush told them yesterday “Don’t even try to run on Repeal unless you mean it!” So I guess they came to a fork in the road then they took it.
To: Recovering_Democrat
Time to retire this old fool.
Heck even a RINO like Mitt Romney has already come flat out for repealing this abomination.
To: Recovering_Democrat
What these idiot political animals need to say is, we’ll repeal this monster bill then, if there was any part of it that was beneficial to Americans, we will off a CLEAN BILL with that benefit in it. No special deals or earmarks, just the benefit in question.
23 posted on
03/23/2010 2:15:58 PM PDT by
Kenny
To: Recovering_Democrat
Utter ignorance is correct. Why ever buy insurance for anything if you can just get it AFTER the bad thing happens?
If you keep pre-existing conditions, you must accept the mandate to carry coverage and, by extension, subsidies for the poor.
If you accept those, you might as well go to single-payer.
24 posted on
03/23/2010 2:15:59 PM PDT by
swain_forkbeard
(Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
To: Recovering_Democrat
I hate to say it but the pre-existing conditions provision in this bill has broad appeal. Trying to overturn that will be detrimental to the overall effort of repealing the bad stuff. There may be a better way to implement the concept such as using the high risk pools that have been discussed, but ultimately there needs to be some way for people with pre-existing conditions to purchase insurance at a reasonable price.
Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. The most important thing right now is for the Republicans to take back control of the Congress this year so we can put an end to the socialist hysteria that has gripped Washington. Then we can work on improvements from there.
25 posted on
03/23/2010 2:16:06 PM PDT by
pb929
To: Recovering_Democrat
This is the same Cornyn that as Chairman of the NRSC rushed to endorse ...... wait for it.....Arlene Specter...... and today still supports.......wait for it............... Charlie Crist....
26 posted on
03/23/2010 2:16:18 PM PDT by
11th Commandment
(http://www.thirty-thousand.org/)
To: Recovering_Democrat
I guess some haven’t learned their lessons....or they are members of the wrong party.
This is a recipe for a Third Party.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson