Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP NC Senate Candidate EDDIE BURKS files papaerwork Monday
EddieBurks4Senate.com ^ | 2/10/2010 | luke1898

Posted on 02/10/2010 1:06:20 PM PST by luke1898

616 Old Liberty Road Asheboro, NC 27203

For Immediate Release Contact: Lisa Clark Phone: (704) 591-2479 info@Burks4Senate.com FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 8 A.M. EDT, February 10,2010 ASHEBORO BUSINESSMAN TO RUN FOR U.S. SENATE ON GOP TICKET ASHEBORO, NC, FEBRUARY 10, 2010: Asheboro City Councilman and prominent business leader, Eddie Burks, officially filed on Monday to run on the GOP ticket for the office of United States Senate. Burks will vie for the Class 3 Senate Seat in the May 4th primary election.

His campaign will focus on the concept of accessibility. “I believe that the single most important job of a United States Senator is to listen to the constituency. And until elected officials can do this, nothing will change. Period.”

Burks believes that our state and our country are in need of a great transformation. "Everybody says we need change, but it's not change if we put the same people back there."

A recent Elon University poll showed that the incumbent’s approval rating among North Carolina adults was just 37 percent. “This is not acceptable to me. North Carolina deserves better.”

Burks has specific information regarding his in depth perspective on the issues of federal spending, health care, homeland security and taxes on his web site, www.burks4senate.com. The site also gives his complete biography and features "Eddie's Blog."

Burks is married to Andra Burgess Burks, a public middle school teacher of 25 years. Eddie and Andra live in Asheboro, NC. The couple has no children and they are quite active in the lives of their eleven nieces and nephews. -End-


TOPICS: Announcements; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: 2010; asheborobusinessman; conservative; ncsenate

1 posted on 02/10/2010 1:06:21 PM PST by luke1898
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: luke1898
Are you a North Carolinian, and what do you know about this candidate? Is he solidly conservative? Does he have a background of study of our nation's founding documents and the ideas of liberty underlying both? And, if so, is he committed to those principles?

These are the questions we should ask of all candidates who seek our support at this critical time in our nation's history, IMHO.

2 posted on 02/10/2010 1:20:22 PM PST by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC; Impy; Clintonfatigued
You seen this Burks challenging Burr ? Sounds like a Democrat trick designed to confuse the voters in the GOP primary with the similar sounding names. This poster just signed up today.
3 posted on 02/10/2010 4:57:22 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; Impy; Clintonfatigued
Yep, we were discussing this on the NC forum a couple weeks ago. I suspect, but don't know, that Burks is a Paulite, although he sounds a little more like Pat Buchanan in foreign policy views.

Given that Burks is a city councilman in Asheboro, I'm inclined to believe he isn't a party to Democrat games (most of the Dems in Asheboro can be seen here).
4 posted on 02/10/2010 6:45:04 PM PST by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC; fieldmarshaldj; Impy

I’d like to see a few Buchananites in Congress, but is there any reason to believe he can win? Perhaps he’s prepping for a future House run, like David Funderburk did in 1986.


5 posted on 02/10/2010 7:02:15 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (Liberal sacred cows make great hamburger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

He’s in Howard Coble’s district (NC6), so there may be something to that. No way he could win this primary, with all the cash Burr is sitting on.


6 posted on 02/10/2010 7:08:16 PM PST by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

You would think that Coble would retire. He’s about 80 years old.


7 posted on 02/10/2010 7:10:54 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (Liberal sacred cows make great hamburger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

He actually has some primary challengers this time (see my About page).


8 posted on 02/10/2010 7:24:20 PM PST by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
You seen this Burks challenging Burr ? Sounds like a Democrat trick designed to confuse the voters in the GOP primary with the similar sounding names. This poster just signed up today.

Kind of like that guy named Kennedy running in Massachusetts but the voters there weren't fooled.

9 posted on 02/10/2010 7:25:23 PM PST by decisis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: loveliberty2
I can assure you that it is not a plot by the democrats as the next the next post suggests.
I know Eddie Burks and he is a native North Carolinian (unlike Senator Burr who moved to NC from Virginia). He has proven time and again during his civic life to be a solid conservative, which is not really a surprise for a Deacon from an independent, fundamental Baptist church. He has always professed a fascination with the history of the founding fathers and their wisdom in creating our Republic. He intreprets the Constitution like he does the Bible, literally. He believes that the roles of our elected officials were originally designed to be those of servants to the people.

And he believes in WORK. He is quite in favor it.

10 posted on 02/10/2010 8:45:28 PM PST by luke1898
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: luke1898

Eddie sounds like a great guy. But the incumbent Burr has a lifetime ACU rating of 90. And i haven’t heard of a great reason to replace him, yet.

Perhaps Burks is organizing and building name recognition to take on Hagan in 2014?


11 posted on 02/11/2010 8:06:06 AM PST by proudpapa (Obama - Worst One Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: decisis

Hilariously that Kennedy was a libertarian and self described Tea Party candidate.

I wasn’t sure if he would take more from Brown or the rat because of his name. He only got a piddling 1%.


12 posted on 02/11/2010 2:08:42 PM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

That reminds me. Awhile ago I found what I think is a case of a real life “Distinguished Gentleman” situation.

Kansas Republican Edward C. Little died in 1924. In the 1924 election rat Chauncey B. Little was elected, he was defeated in 1926.


13 posted on 02/11/2010 2:29:38 PM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Impy

That may have been more coincidental. Democrat Chauncey had won office as Johnson County Attorney (1909-13) before Edward Little ever reached Congress (1917). Edward was a bonafide War Hero, having received the Medal of Honor. Edward was a resident of Kansas City, Chauncey of Olathe.

Somewhat confusingly, there were TWO contests run for the Nov ‘24 election, for the full term (1925-27) and for the remainder (Nov ‘24-Mar ‘25). Former KC Mayor Ulysses Guyer ran for the short term, and won handily, 62-38% over the Democrat. Chauncey prevailed by a 48.8% plurality in a 3-man race on the same day. The big question is what was wrong with the GOP nominee, and perhaps I found the answer...

The candidate running was one Russell Dyer, who apparently was a local newspaper editor (listed as “Camett, KS”, which I can’t find), and I found an article from 1924 where Dyer blasted Kansas City AND St. Louis as being the place to get a “glimpse of hell.” While others might chime in in agreement today, I personally have reason to grit my teeth at that comment. My cousin was MAYOR of St. Louis when Dyer fired his potshot, and compared to today, Henry Kiel transformed StL into one of America’s premier cities, growing and booming under his tenure. Dyer suggested KC and StL be placed under “martial law.” If this is the same Dyer, there stands a considerable likelihood this rubbed folks the wrong way (KC, KS was in that district he was running in).

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=sCUrAAAAIBAJ&sjid=edMEAAAAIBAJ&pg=2526,1479013&dq=russell-dyer+kansas&hl=en

Had Guyer been the nominee in both races that year (why he wasn’t, I don’t know), he probably would’ve won over Chauncey, especially with Coolidge at the top of the ticket. Guyer did end up running in ‘26 (which would’ve been an anti-GOP backlash year), and won by a 52-48% margin (Little getting just a half-percent below what he got in ‘24). Little also became the 1928 Gubernatorial nominee, but lost in a landslide to Clyde Reed. Little sought a second rematch with Rep. Guyer in 1930, but lost 57-43%.


14 posted on 02/11/2010 4:13:22 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: proudpapa

Burr is not well known in NC like his predecessor John Edwards! People there like brand names.


15 posted on 02/13/2010 10:22:54 PM PST by Theodore R. (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson