Posted on 02/10/2010 9:11:39 AM PST by SeekAndFind
A recent flap in a Berkeley high school reveals what a farce fairness can be. Because this is ultra-liberal Berkeley, perhaps we should not be surprised that a proposal has been made to eliminate four jobs as science teachers and use the money saved for programs to help low achievers.
In Berkeley, as in many other communities across the country, black and Latino students are not performing as well as Asian and white students. In fact, the racial gap in academic achievement at Berkeley High School is the highest in California no doubt a special source of embarrassment in politically correct Berkeley.
According to the principal, Our community at Berkeley High School has failed the African Americans. Therefore We need to bring everybody up thats what this plan is about.
Surely no one, not even in Berkeley, seriously believes that you will bring everybody up by eliminating science teachers. This is a proposal to redistribute money from science to social work, by providing every student with advisers on note-taking, time management, and other learning skills.
The point is to close educational gaps between groups, or at least go on record as trying. As with most equalization crusades, whether in education or in the economy, it is about equalizing downward, by lowering those at the top. Fairness strikes again!
This is not just a crazy idea by one principal in Berkeley. It is a crazy idea taught in schools of education across the country. A professor of education at the University of San Francisco has weighed in on the controversy at Berkeley, supporting the idea of projects designed to narrow the achievement gap.
In keeping with the rhetoric of the prevailing ideology, our education professor refers to privileged parents and privileged children who want to forestall any progress toward equity.
In the language of the politically correct, achievement is equated with privilege. Such verbal sleight of hand evades the question whether individuals priorities and efforts affect outcomes, whether in education or in other endeavors. No need to look at empirical evidence when a clever phrase can take that whole question off the table.
This verbal sleight of hand is not confined to education. A study of incomes of various groups in Toronto concluded that Canadians of Japanese ancestry were the most privileged group in that city. That is, people of Japanese ancestry there had higher incomes than members of other minorities and higher incomes than the white majority in Toronto.
What makes the privileged label a particularly bad joke in this case is a history of blatant discrimination against the Japanese in Canada in years past, including a longer internment during World War II than that of Japanese Americans. But, to some on the left, the very concept of achievement must be banished by all means necessary, regardless of the facts.
#PAGE# Achievement by overcoming obstacles is a special threat to the Lefts vision of the world, and so must be magically transformed into privilege through rhetoric.
Those with that vision do not want to even discuss evidence that students from different groups spend different amounts of time on homework and different amounts of time on social activities. To admit that inputs affect outputs, whether in education, in the economy, or in other areas, would be to undermine the vision and agenda of the Left, and deprive those who believe in that vision of a moral melodrama starring themselves as defenders of the oppressed and crusaders against the forces of evil.
Redistribution of material resources has a very poor track record when it comes to actually helping those who are lagging, whether in education, in the economy, or elsewhere. What they need are the attitudes, priorities, and behavior which produce the outcomes desired.
But changing anyones attitudes, priorities, and behavior is a lot harder than taking a stance as defenders of the oppressed and crusaders against the forces of evil.
To the extent that doing the latter misdiagnoses the problem, it makes solving the problem even harder. That does no good for those who are lagging, however much it exalts those who pose as their defenders. Fairness indeed!
Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution.
I’m sure Barry O will be willing to fund it out of his stash.
The parents may have had the right intent, but perhaps the kid really needed an intense tutorial environment to teach basic reading/writing/mathematical skills before entering a science class. It was targeted at 9th grade. Presumably, you can read, write and perform basic algebraic equations at that point in life.
I recall Nathaniel Borenstein (inventor of MIME) relating his experience in the university in Tel Aviv. He took all the Hebrew classes growing up as a kid and figured he was ready to dive into college with that level of skill. It was a real struggle for him. He's a very bright guy, but put himself into a situation that was extremely challenging compared to his current ability.
That’s a perfect example of one of the problems with our schools today. They push kids through even though they aren’t qualified.
I was substituting for an IA a few weeks ago. They were doing a science lesson and I had to explain to the classroom teacher how a gas becomes a liquid.
Read the article. That's why I said you can cherry pick good performers because there is a range of intelligence in all groups. The bright kids need to be pushed harder to achieve their full potential. Push them to the limits of their capability, but not beyond. Otherwise, you have dispirited students who won't participate in an environment where they have no hope of success.
I still think a two track system would solve the problem. One track devoted to ethnic studies, one track devoted to college prep.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.