Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Fairness’ in Education (At a Berkeley high school, “equality” means fewer science teachers)
National Review ^ | 02/11/2010 | Thomas Sowell

Posted on 02/10/2010 9:11:39 AM PST by SeekAndFind

A recent flap in a Berkeley high school reveals what a farce “fairness” can be. Because this is ultra-liberal Berkeley, perhaps we should not be surprised that a proposal has been made to eliminate four jobs as science teachers and use the money saved for programs to help low achievers.

In Berkeley, as in many other communities across the country, black and Latino students are not performing as well as Asian and white students. In fact, the racial gap in academic achievement at Berkeley High School is the highest in California — no doubt a special source of embarrassment in politically correct Berkeley.

According to the principal, “Our community at Berkeley High School has failed the African Americans.” Therefore “We need to bring everybody up — that’s what this plan is about.”

Surely no one, not even in Berkeley, seriously believes that you will “bring everybody up” by eliminating science teachers. This is a proposal to redistribute money from science to social work, by providing every student with advisers on note-taking, time management, and other learning skills.

The point is to close educational gaps between groups, or at least go on record as trying. As with most equalization crusades, whether in education or in the economy, it is about equalizing downward, by lowering those at the top. “Fairness” strikes again!

This is not just a crazy idea by one principal in Berkeley. It is a crazy idea taught in schools of education across the country. A professor of education at the University of San Francisco has weighed in on the controversy at Berkeley, supporting the idea of “projects designed to narrow the achievement gap.”

In keeping with the rhetoric of the prevailing ideology, our education professor refers to “privileged” parents and “privileged” children who want to “forestall any progress toward equity.”

In the language of the politically correct, achievement is equated with privilege. Such verbal sleight of hand evades the question whether individuals’ priorities and efforts affect outcomes, whether in education or in other endeavors. No need to look at empirical evidence when a clever phrase can take that whole question off the table.

This verbal sleight of hand is not confined to education. A study of incomes of various groups in Toronto concluded that Canadians of Japanese ancestry were the most “privileged” group in that city. That is, people of Japanese ancestry there had higher incomes than members of other minorities and higher incomes than the white majority in Toronto.

What makes the “privileged” label a particularly bad joke in this case is a history of blatant discrimination against the Japanese in Canada in years past, including a longer internment during World War II than that of Japanese Americans. But, to some on the left, the very concept of achievement must be banished by all means necessary, regardless of the facts.

#PAGE# Achievement by overcoming obstacles is a special threat to the Left’s vision of the world, and so must be magically transformed into privilege through rhetoric.

Those with that vision do not want to even discuss evidence that students from different groups spend different amounts of time on homework and different amounts of time on social activities. To admit that inputs affect outputs, whether in education, in the economy, or in other areas, would be to undermine the vision and agenda of the Left, and deprive those who believe in that vision of a moral melodrama starring themselves as defenders of the oppressed and crusaders against the forces of evil.

Redistribution of material resources has a very poor track record when it comes to actually helping those who are lagging, whether in education, in the economy, or elsewhere. What they need are the attitudes, priorities, and behavior which produce the outcomes desired.

But changing anyone’s attitudes, priorities, and behavior is a lot harder than taking a stance as defenders of the oppressed and crusaders against the forces of evil.

To the extent that doing the latter misdiagnoses the problem, it makes solving the problem even harder. That does no good for those who are lagging, however much it exalts those who pose as their defenders. “Fairness” indeed!

— Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: academicbias; antiscience; berkeley; dumbkids; dumbteachers; dumbthemdown; education; equality; fairness; highschools; leftismoncampus; ludites; nea; publicschools; scienceeducation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: animal172

I’m sure Barry O will be willing to fund it out of his stash.


21 posted on 02/10/2010 11:47:02 AM PST by BenKenobi (;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: animal172
I think the kid learned to spew that epithet to cover his lack of ability. The test contents were simply questions that could be answered based on reading assignments and material presented in class. It was objective and easy. No surprises. You certainly can cook up a test that could be labeled "racist" if the questions consisted of jargon known generally within a racial group, but not part of society as a whole. Would you perform well if the question was posed in street gang ebonics with pictures of gang signs and answers required in street ebonics? A kid in a street gang would probably do OK on such a test. The rest of society would fail miserably. That example is a red herring when applied to the junior high science test. The material was presented to all the students attending the class. All were given an equally quiet room, comfortable desk and writing instruments to complete the test. A totally level playing field. Once again, equality of opportunity is no guarantee of equality of outcome.
22 posted on 02/10/2010 12:28:21 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RC2
At least the parents of that black kid put him in summer school to try and help him. He just didn’t want the help.

The parents may have had the right intent, but perhaps the kid really needed an intense tutorial environment to teach basic reading/writing/mathematical skills before entering a science class. It was targeted at 9th grade. Presumably, you can read, write and perform basic algebraic equations at that point in life.

I recall Nathaniel Borenstein (inventor of MIME) relating his experience in the university in Tel Aviv. He took all the Hebrew classes growing up as a kid and figured he was ready to dive into college with that level of skill. It was a real struggle for him. He's a very bright guy, but put himself into a situation that was extremely challenging compared to his current ability.

23 posted on 02/10/2010 12:36:48 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Soothesayer
There weren't IAs when I attended school. A normal classroom had about 35 students. The teachers didn't whine. They just delivered a decent education. By the time my kids attended elementary school, there were IAs. I saw the corrections on papers my sons submitted. OMG! The "teacher" was incompetent as hell. I went back over the paper and corrected it and explained what was wrong and how it should be corrected. Of course, it was necessary to slather my sons in "black history month" each year. It was a big deal for the teacher (who was black). I was able to compensate for crappy teachers. Not every parent has that capacity. We all pay a premium in taxes to fund these crappy schools.
24 posted on 02/10/2010 12:42:26 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

That’s a perfect example of one of the problems with our schools today. They push kids through even though they aren’t qualified.


25 posted on 02/10/2010 12:47:10 PM PST by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RC2
They called it "social promotion" when I was in school. The kids were moved forward to keep them with their age peers. It only takes a couple promotions like that to ensure a failure. You need a "pee" test to discern whether the glazed expression is drugs or being totally lost today. Put another leftist DVD on to keep the kids entertained. It's easier than teaching and grading papers.
26 posted on 02/10/2010 2:18:03 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin
Genetic?


27 posted on 02/11/2010 12:43:04 AM PST by rdb3 (The mouth is the exhaust pipe of the heart. WHO DAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

I was substituting for an IA a few weeks ago. They were doing a science lesson and I had to explain to the classroom teacher how a gas becomes a liquid.


28 posted on 02/11/2010 6:11:08 AM PST by Soothesayer (The United States of America Rest in Peace November 4 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Race differences in average IQ are largely genetic

Read the article. That's why I said you can cherry pick good performers because there is a range of intelligence in all groups. The bright kids need to be pushed harder to achieve their full potential. Push them to the limits of their capability, but not beyond. Otherwise, you have dispirited students who won't participate in an environment where they have no hope of success.

29 posted on 02/11/2010 9:29:30 AM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I still think a two track system would solve the problem. One track devoted to ethnic studies, one track devoted to college prep.


30 posted on 02/11/2010 9:35:51 AM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson