Posted on 02/10/2010 9:11:39 AM PST by SeekAndFind
A recent flap in a Berkeley high school reveals what a farce fairness can be. Because this is ultra-liberal Berkeley, perhaps we should not be surprised that a proposal has been made to eliminate four jobs as science teachers and use the money saved for programs to help low achievers.
In Berkeley, as in many other communities across the country, black and Latino students are not performing as well as Asian and white students. In fact, the racial gap in academic achievement at Berkeley High School is the highest in California no doubt a special source of embarrassment in politically correct Berkeley.
According to the principal, Our community at Berkeley High School has failed the African Americans. Therefore We need to bring everybody up thats what this plan is about.
Surely no one, not even in Berkeley, seriously believes that you will bring everybody up by eliminating science teachers. This is a proposal to redistribute money from science to social work, by providing every student with advisers on note-taking, time management, and other learning skills.
The point is to close educational gaps between groups, or at least go on record as trying. As with most equalization crusades, whether in education or in the economy, it is about equalizing downward, by lowering those at the top. Fairness strikes again!
This is not just a crazy idea by one principal in Berkeley. It is a crazy idea taught in schools of education across the country. A professor of education at the University of San Francisco has weighed in on the controversy at Berkeley, supporting the idea of projects designed to narrow the achievement gap.
In keeping with the rhetoric of the prevailing ideology, our education professor refers to privileged parents and privileged children who want to forestall any progress toward equity.
In the language of the politically correct, achievement is equated with privilege. Such verbal sleight of hand evades the question whether individuals priorities and efforts affect outcomes, whether in education or in other endeavors. No need to look at empirical evidence when a clever phrase can take that whole question off the table.
This verbal sleight of hand is not confined to education. A study of incomes of various groups in Toronto concluded that Canadians of Japanese ancestry were the most privileged group in that city. That is, people of Japanese ancestry there had higher incomes than members of other minorities and higher incomes than the white majority in Toronto.
What makes the privileged label a particularly bad joke in this case is a history of blatant discrimination against the Japanese in Canada in years past, including a longer internment during World War II than that of Japanese Americans. But, to some on the left, the very concept of achievement must be banished by all means necessary, regardless of the facts.
#PAGE# Achievement by overcoming obstacles is a special threat to the Lefts vision of the world, and so must be magically transformed into privilege through rhetoric.
Those with that vision do not want to even discuss evidence that students from different groups spend different amounts of time on homework and different amounts of time on social activities. To admit that inputs affect outputs, whether in education, in the economy, or in other areas, would be to undermine the vision and agenda of the Left, and deprive those who believe in that vision of a moral melodrama starring themselves as defenders of the oppressed and crusaders against the forces of evil.
Redistribution of material resources has a very poor track record when it comes to actually helping those who are lagging, whether in education, in the economy, or elsewhere. What they need are the attitudes, priorities, and behavior which produce the outcomes desired.
But changing anyones attitudes, priorities, and behavior is a lot harder than taking a stance as defenders of the oppressed and crusaders against the forces of evil.
To the extent that doing the latter misdiagnoses the problem, it makes solving the problem even harder. That does no good for those who are lagging, however much it exalts those who pose as their defenders. Fairness indeed!
Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution.
Once again public schools focus on the underachievers at the expense of the good students.
I guess it’s “fair” not to teach science to the general population of the schools because some students just don’t get it and have no interest in it. Basically, it boils down to the fact that some parents are embarrassed that other kids are smarter than their kids.
Marxism rears its head once again, leading to the usual failure.
They’re liberals. It’s the only thing that makes them feel like they matter, when they “support the underdog”, no matter whom it hurts.
Key phrase:
“In the language of the politically correct, achievement is equated with privilege. Such verbal sleight of hand evades the question whether individuals priorities and efforts affect outcomes, whether in education or in other endeavors.”
Ever since school integration, high schools have become bi-modal - ghetto trolls and the college bound enrolled in the same school. Then, the race hustlers bemoan the “gap” of achievement.
Berkeley’s move is simply the latest in the liberal quest to eliminate excellence in America through the dumbing down of public schools.
The liberals are the only thing creating the racial gap. If it weren’t for these idiots, children of every race would succeed together or fail together.
As usual, liberals are the source of every human problem.
I certainly hope you helped them out by signing up. I can understand how the employer figured shifting the "buyout" money to soften the increase in premiums might make sense to the business. My company dropped the ESOP program and put the money into limiting health care insurance premiums. It is no surprise that employees are buying less stock now. Every choice has a consequence.
At least the parents of that black kid put him in summer school to try and help him. He just didn’t want the help.
Can teach children how to use the scientific method to prove something. Their scams to steal trillions of dollars under the guise of “Global Climate Change” would fall flat.
I don't agree with that at all. Endless piles of money have been thrown at trying to "fix" the achievement gap between racial groups. It has persisted unchanged for the last 50 years. There are genetic, cultural, political and societal reasons behind the problem. If you cherry pick some individuals on the high end of the IQ curve and shelter them from the negative cultural influences, you might succeed. In the real world where the socialists force a room of mixed ability children together and teach to the the capability of the least capable child in the room, you get crappy results. Separate them by ability and teach of room full of similarly capable students. You'll get a better result. Intelligence is not improved by osmosis.
I do agree that you can create a room full of children that can all fail together. It is done daily in the public schools.
If we could just incorporate rap into science education maybe things would get better.
Many schools still have teacher IAs pull low-achieving students out of class and have them work in small groups.
Unfortunately many districts across the country are laying off teachers and IAs so more money can go to useless programs which amount to nothing but restrictions on the curriculum. I hear teachers complain about this all the time. The people who actually care about the kids are not allowed to do their jobs.
Folks, I am not a rocket scientist, but can someone explain how a test can be racist?
Any test that has questions which refer to dead white men is both racist and sexist.
You are clearly in need of re-education.
Is there a camp I can attend? If so, can I get a government subisdy to assist in tuiton?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.