and the RATS, take another one in the..............................HA ha!!!
Posted on 02/05/2010 4:34:42 AM PST by Schnucki
To call these things "mistakes" is to imply that they were unintentional errors, rather than a pervasive web of fraud and lies.
A worthless piece of paper.
The money spent on these reports is another crime.
And the longterm brainwashing of the infantile left that will perpetuate for years.
These people have been so brainwashed that they are beyond reason. If you contradict them or ask them a question they cannot answer (explain the thermohaline currents to me) you suddenly become a blasphemer against their god.
Now that the proof that this is all a communist/totalitarian conjob is right in their face, they will still support it, because they believe that making people abide by the edicts of the GW lords is “justice.”
It is hitting the Sheeple in the only place that wakes them up. The Wallet. Most of them would rather slog along complacently until all of a sudden they stampede.
Good point!
“Maarten Hajer, the director of that agency argued the conclusions of the IPPC are still solid: climate is changing, the earth is warming up and human behaviour is to blame for a large part of that. He did acknowledge damage had been done to the reputation of climate scientists. “But I prefer to call it a scratch in the finish rather than a dent,” he said.”
Maarten Hajer should be sacked/s##t-canned/summarilly terminated......
Lefty Enviro-wanker
Typical junk science popular fad.
Width... but no DEPTH.
To brainwash a liberal; give him/her an enema.
26% is below sea level?? So how can it be counted as part of the land mass to start with??
The public trust in politics IN science has been badly damaged.
They have dikes to hold the sea back,,,,,,,,,, It’s just like New Orleans, only bigger....................
On the contrary,
that piece of paper is intended to cost us TRILLIONS.
Below sea level doesn’t mean “under water”.
It just means it WOULD be under water if there weren’t intervening land masses above sea level.
I agree. Calling this a “mistake” is most definitely an error.
Good news I guess, the climate threat is nothing to be worried about.
“...and even descriptions from tourist guides and observations from volunteers”
I wonder who came up with the idea that the snow in Himalaya would melt by 2035? Perhaps some nut case who doesn’t get enough oxygen into his brain because he’s climed too high up into thin air. Thin air is also the source of the IPCC’s reports.
Obama is a lawyer and as such used to go after other people’s money. In law suits there might be many losers, but also some greedy winners. The problem is he’s the president now, so who is going to be the loser who has to pay for all the money Obama is getting for his supporters this time around?
A very telling statement... Perhaps we should postpone our conclusions until we actually do know something?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.