Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/26/2010 12:05:11 PM PST by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: rabscuttle385

Call his bluff!


2 posted on 01/26/2010 12:07:02 PM PST by Burkean (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lmarie373; Abundy; missanne; Victoria Delsoul; 50mm; stockpirate; Eaker; ducdriver; ChrisInAR; ...
The Fiscal Freeze Act of 2010, which Bayh and McCain hope to introduce to the Senate later this week, includes provisions to install a spending freeze and earmark moratorium until the deficit is eliminated, enforce the Congressional budget resolution as binding law and even create a constitutionally viable line-item veto to "give the President power to strike out wasteful earmarks and other extraneous spending items."


3 posted on 01/26/2010 12:07:33 PM PST by rabscuttle385 (Purge the RINOs! * http://restoretheconstitution.ning.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
Interesting since Republicans won that seat making it difficult for Dems to just pass anything without working for it that Senator McCain is crossing the isle again. I find the timing very interesting.
4 posted on 01/26/2010 12:08:00 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Hasn’t the line-item veto been ruled unconstitutional?


5 posted on 01/26/2010 12:08:54 PM PST by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

McCain! You friggin IDIOT!
He’ll only use it to punish conservatives!!!


7 posted on 01/26/2010 12:10:17 PM PST by G Larry (DNC is comprised of REGRESSIVES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

i wonder how he is going to create a constitutional line item veto considering that the Supreme Court has already said that a line item veto is a violation of the separation of powers.


9 posted on 01/26/2010 12:10:52 PM PST by jdub (A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
Its a good step in the right direction and another sign Obamacare is dead. We can't afford a $1 trillion dollar new entitlement. The focus now is on cutting the deficit and creating new jobs. Its not the season for new spending initiatives. Yes, Massachusetts changed the entire political dynamic in Washington. We wouldn't be having this taking place if Scott Brown had lost.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus

11 posted on 01/26/2010 12:11:28 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

“”I think the president understands now how serious this problem is, that it requires hatchets and scalpels. It requires a hatchet to get the budget under control and it requires a scalpel to eliminate wasteful and unnecessary spending,” McCain said.”

McAmnesty doesn’t care how much money is wasted...as long as it’s wasted on his PET projects. He’s just grandstanding..again!

Saturday, February 09, 2008
Bill to improve health care…in Mexico! McCain strikes again!

What would Americans think, then, of a member of Congress who introduced legislation, not to improve health care in the United States, but to improve health care in Mexico?

Insane? Drunk? Unworthy of public office?

What would Americans think, then, of a bill introduced in Congress that required federal agencies to come up with a plan, not to expand health coverage in the United States, but to expand health coverage in Mexico?

Impossible? Unthinkable? Wildly irresponsible?

What would Americans think, then, of the motives of a senator, who not only introduced a bill to improve Mexico’s health care system and extend coverage to a growing population of 120 million people, but gave health insurance companies the right to help devise the plan?

Blatantly corrupt? Grossly indifferent to the well-being of the American people? Downright treasonous?

Unbelievable as it may seem, the Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act of 2005 contained a provision giving insurance companies the right to help devise a plan for extending US health care to Mexico (Sec. 1004. BINATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH INFRASTRUCTURE AND HEALTH INSURANCE).

Even more unbelievable, the senator who sponsored the bill is not on the verge of being thrown out of office for this odious piece of legislation. No, the senator who introduced the bill, Senator John McCain of Arizona, is on the verge of locking up the Republican nomination to be our next president[snip]

http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/search?q=john+mccain+fred+thompson

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
May 12, 2005

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. GRAHAM, and Mr. SALAZAR) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

TITLE X—PROMOTING ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE

Sec. 1001. Federal reimbursement of emergency health services furnished to undocumented aliens.

Sec. 1002. Prohibition against offset of certain Medicare and Medicaid payments.

Sec. 1003. Prohibition against discrimination against aliens on the basis of employment in hospital-based versus nonhospital-based sites.

Sec. 1004. Binational public health infrastructure and health insurance.
http://opensourceactivist.org/content/legislation/S1033/text.php#sec1004


12 posted on 01/26/2010 12:11:34 PM PST by AuntB (If Al Qaeda grew drugs & burned our forests instead of armed Mexican Cartels would anyone notice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
I would support giving 0bama or any president a line-item veto, even though it would require a Constitutional Amendment to do so. Then it would be impossible for the president to play the "Congress did it" card when it comes to deficits.

I say the GOP should go for this, even offer the whole caucus in both houses to vote in support of such an amendment.

16 posted on 01/26/2010 12:14:31 PM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
From George Will's Washington Post

QUOTE Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts said: "If we accept your constitutional argument, we're establishing a precedent that you yourself say would extend to banning the book" -- a hypothetical 500-page book containing one sentence that said "vote for" a particular candidate. UNQUOTE

Who now wants to support the co-author of the McCain Feingold attempt to crush Political Free Speech ?


17 posted on 01/26/2010 12:15:32 PM PST by pyx (Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

http://www.cato.org/testimony/ct-sm032300.html

Interesting commentary on LIV.
McCain involved in this one too.
Interesting how when Reagan wanted this, no one in congress was interested.


18 posted on 01/26/2010 12:16:36 PM PST by Marty62 (former Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

I think this might be brilliant. Offer up a Line Item Veto to Zero....That makes HIM totally responsible, not the Congress. And, its not like the Republicans are going to get anything passed into a bill anyway, so there’s not going to be too many pet projects taken away from Reps to start with. Then, when we get a conservative in there, bar the door Katy, lets start with some serious cuts!


19 posted on 01/26/2010 12:17:17 PM PST by BallparkBoys (Republicans spend $100,000 getting women into clothes while Democrats spend $100,000 getting women o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Yes, Juan....let’s just give this Dictator a line-item veto, just when we are about to retake the Senate and/or House, and let’s just give him the power to negate ANY power we might gain from this....jeeessssshhhh....people wonder now why the hell anyone, even a Republican, listens to you any more...go away and fade off into the sunset.. you’ve outlived what good you’ll do in this world.


21 posted on 01/26/2010 12:19:05 PM PST by Gaffer ("Profling: The only profile I need is a chalk outline around their dead ass!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Constitutional or not, Obama is the last president who should be given a line item veto. Just look at how his nitwit attorney general uses his discretion: letting off 100% guilty black panther voter intimidators, Mirandizing a terrorist who was singing like a bird. And they’d use a line item veto just as stupidly.

And I think Juan McCain might be overplaying his hand. The challenge from JD really has the little backstabber fired up, and the voters might not be as impressed with some of his recent maneuvers as he expects.


22 posted on 01/26/2010 12:19:23 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
which Bayh and McCain hope

Lame Duck and Crazed Duck come up with an idea.

23 posted on 01/26/2010 12:21:39 PM PST by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
Are so many FReepers so short sighted and blindly partisan that they are FOR a line item veto when there is a Republican President, but AGAINST a line item veto when there is a Democrat President?

Either you think a line item veto is a good idea or you do not.

Either you think the line item veto is Constitutional, or you disagree.

Such positions should be irrespective of who is currently and temporarily occupying the Oval Office.

24 posted on 01/26/2010 12:22:30 PM PST by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
This is one more example of McCain not doing his homework, and making a stupid recommendation as a result. Many presidents have sought the line-item veto.

Congress finally passed it as a law, under Clinton. Clinton used it once. Then the Supreme Court ruled that the line-item veto could only be established by a constitutional amendment.

McCain is only ten years behind the curve on this. Fool that he is.

John / Billybob

27 posted on 01/26/2010 12:27:20 PM PST by Congressman Billybob (www.TheseAretheTimes.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

The line item veto is GOOD - we WANT that

All it can ever be used for is cutting spending

Yes a democrap may occasionaly weild it, but thats OK you gotta take the good with the bad


31 posted on 01/26/2010 12:31:11 PM PST by Mr. K (This administration IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Why is John always reaching across the aisle? How come the Dems don’t reach across the aisle?

The freeze idea is idiotic. It is meaningless.


32 posted on 01/26/2010 12:32:24 PM PST by RexBeach ("Those are my principles...if you don't like them, I have others." Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
Once again...


35 posted on 01/26/2010 12:38:54 PM PST by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson