I'm at a loss for words on this one.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: Bluestateredman
9 is too young to be a mother anyway.
2 posted on
01/03/2010 6:25:55 AM PST by
Oztrich Boy
(Life is a tragedy for those who feel, but a comedy to those who think. - Horace Walpole)
To: Bluestateredman
Why the Hell am I expected to help raise her kids?
3 posted on
01/03/2010 6:27:04 AM PST by
SWAMPSNIPER
(THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
To: Bluestateredman
It’s too bad her mother didnt have a tubal ligation.
4 posted on
01/03/2010 6:27:16 AM PST by
Venturer
To: Bluestateredman
There’s nothing wrong with having 9 kids in a healthy marriage! :)
But this woman obviously has mental problems. To top it all off she has a hereditary disease.
5 posted on
01/03/2010 6:27:56 AM PST by
chuck_the_tv_out
( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
To: Bluestateredman
She’s an idiot, no doubt, but idiot or not, forcing sterilization on someone is evil....
6 posted on
01/03/2010 6:29:26 AM PST by
freebilly
(No wonder the left has a boner for Obama. There's CIALIS in soCIALISt....)
To: Bluestateredman
I like “God works in mysterious ways.”
8 posted on
01/03/2010 6:31:09 AM PST by
TheZMan
(Just secede and get it over with. No love lost on either side. Cya.)
To: Bluestateredman
This is troubling.
Yes, this woman is the extreme example and logically should have been dealt with...
but if the courts or social services or whoever can do this to loonies it can do it to ANYBODY.
9 posted on
01/03/2010 6:31:59 AM PST by
Mrs.Z
To: Bluestateredman
Its my choice
Not exactly, sister. If my taxes pay for your SSI and welfare, I think I should get a say in how you conduct yourself.
10 posted on
01/03/2010 6:32:25 AM PST by
MAexile
(Bats left, votes right)
To: Bluestateredman
This one want a lawsuit. I doubt if they did actually sterilize her against her will.
To: Bluestateredman
Her fiance is a personal care assistant? At best he makes between $8 and $12 an hour. Course I guess with welfare of what, about $500 a month per child, food stamps, a Hud rental, and his "comfortable" income, they are living high on the hog. And is she getting child support from any of the other sperm donors?
They just need a teensy bit more for which a lawsuit settlement will help.
And these companies need to stop settling these frivolous lawsuits. Her first with CVS, she used (if, in fact, she really did use it) an expired spermicide. She's playin' the system like a fiddle.
17 posted on
01/03/2010 6:50:32 AM PST by
3catsanadog
(If healthcare reform is passed, 41 years old will be the new 65 YO.)
To: Bluestateredman
I think it is great that she wants to take responsibility for her life, including her ability to reproduce.
Therefore she certainly realizes that taking responsibility also means no longer accepting govt payments.
18 posted on
01/03/2010 6:50:55 AM PST by
ikka
To: Bluestateredman
Reproductive rights have nothing to do with this.
This woman is mentally ill.
19 posted on
01/03/2010 6:52:18 AM PST by
Erik Latranyi
(Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
To: All
This is telling:
THIS IS MY BODY: Tessa SAVICKI, shown above in her Springfield home with children, from left, Destiny TIRADO, Jassalyn Tirado, Julian TORRES-LEBRON and Manuel FLORES is suing Baystate Medical Center
But she’s not jumping from guy to guy getting pregnant....
To: Bluestateredman
>>Savicki has nine children from several men, is unemployed and relies on public assistance for two of the four children
>>Its my choice
...to live off other people’s money.
>>Savicki acknowledged that some may feel little sympathy for her situation, but cautioned against public judgment because she is a poor, unmarried mother of 9.
I am sick to death of these feral humans saying “don’t be judgin’ me” and then expecting people to pay for their lifestyle choices. She needed a .22 caliber sterilization years ago.
>>I take care of my kids.
No. You. Don’t!
22 posted on
01/03/2010 6:54:56 AM PST by
Bryanw92
(Imagine a day when the politicians have to hold a bake sale to pay for votes!)
To: Bluestateredman
Idiocracy in real life. - A second dark ages is coming soon.
23 posted on
01/03/2010 6:55:02 AM PST by
gore_sux
(Al Franken - Preferred by Minnesota Educated Somali Pirates and Suicide Bombers Everywhere)
To: Bluestateredman
- No doctor should be able to autonomously make a decision to sterilize someone without their consent, unless medically necessary. That should take legislation and oversight by a judge. The woman should win her lawsuit, if she did not ask for this.
- Only 2 of her kids are on public assistance. Why only two? Is it something like Social Security Survivor Benefits, payable in the event of the death of a parent, regardless of income? If so, that's an entitlement, that I wouldn't call public assistance. That's a right, an insurance company payout, even if the government is the insurance company. How are the other kids fed? The woman claims to be taking care of them, maybe she is?
- If the woman has lymphoma, having more children is irresponsible.
- However, the Muslims would pop out little terrorists regardless of how poor and sad their sand flee bitten lives would be. And as long as the west has open borders to them, they'll never have an incentive to stop.
- Shades of "Idiocracy". The dumb multiply like rabbits, while the intelligent limit their reproduction, resulting in the degradation of the general human intelligence.
24 posted on
01/03/2010 6:58:01 AM PST by
DannyTN
To: Bluestateredman
This woman is going from tubal ligation to terrible litigation...
28 posted on
01/03/2010 7:15:44 AM PST by
UCFRoadWarrior
(Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all FReepers)
To: Bluestateredman
If a woman continues to have child after chld on welfare, there should be a law requiring her to be sterilized.
29 posted on
01/03/2010 7:19:39 AM PST by
Thane_Banquo
(The GOP: The Big Tent with a Fifth Column.)
To: Bluestateredman
Let me help: white trash loser.
30 posted on
01/03/2010 7:21:31 AM PST by
43north
(BHO: 50% white, 50% black, 100% red)
To: Bluestateredman
I agree with her that it is her "choice" to have as many babies as she wants. What I do not agree with is being made, via the cash stolen from me in the form of taxes, to be used to care for her or her children.
Scripture teaches us that if a man (or woman for that matter) doesn't work they do NOT eat. Simple. Her children are her responsibility. She should be made to take care of them. Should a child die due to her neglect she goes to jail and walla, no more bastard children being produced by her.
I'm sick of all this government involvement in family affairs. I love children with all my heart, I have four of my own, but I do not believe anyone has any business telling a parent how to care for and raise their children and I don't believe the general public should be forced to do so. Child protection services need to go the way of the dinosaur and leave the raising of children to those whom God has entrusted with their upbringing... THEIR PARENTS.
I know... Too simple and oh.... How cold eh?
31 posted on
01/03/2010 7:22:21 AM PST by
The Anti-One
(So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson