Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senior Dem: Kill the Senate health reform bill and start over
The Hill ^ | December 23, 2009 | Michael O'Brien

Posted on 12/23/2009 11:54:15 AM PST by ksm1

The Senate's healthcare bill is fatally flawed, a senior Democrat atop a powerful committee said on Wednesday.

Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.), the chairwoman of the House Rules Committee and co-chairwoman of the Congressional Pro-Choice Caucus, said that the Senate's bill is so flawed that it's unlikely to be resolved in conference with the bill to have passed the House.

"The Senate health care bill is not worthy of the historic vote that the House took a month ago," Slaughter wrote in an opinion piece for CNN's website.

Slaughter argued that while the House bill is far from perfect, the Senate bill's exclusion of a public option, along with abortion funding restrictions and other measures, make the bill undeserving of a vote.

Specifically, Slaughter said, the Senate bill would charge seniors higher premiums, would fail to nix health insurers' antitrust exemption and would not go far enough in extending coverage to people in the U.S.

"Supporters of the weak Senate bill say 'just pass it — any bill is better than no bill,' " Slaughter wrote. "I strongly disagree — a conference report is unlikely to sufficiently bridge the gap between these two very different bills."

The New York Democrat also sounded a note similar to what Republicans have said (though for different reasons): Scrap the current healthcare bill, and start over.

"It's time that we draw the line on this weak bill and ask the Senate to go back to the drawing board," she said. "The American people deserve at least that."


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhohealthcare; catfight; democrats; demsuicide; health; healthcare; killthebill; obamacare; reform; slaughter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: ArrogantBustard

I was wondering when someone was going to post that.


41 posted on 12/23/2009 6:44:02 PM PST by Lou Budvis (She never bankrupted Alaska or bowed to royalty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ksm1

Kill the bill in liberal speak means: what are you going to give me to support it. She’s haggling, arguing her price.


42 posted on 12/23/2009 7:50:36 PM PST by socialismisinsidious ( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ksm1; STE=Q; rocco55; thouworm; rxsid; GOPJ; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; ...

PING to the list.

Dems are already getting a Merry Christmas Welcome back home.

The cracks get bigger.


43 posted on 12/23/2009 8:29:05 PM PST by Candor7 ((The effective weapons Against Fascism are ridicule, derision , truth (.Member NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ksm1

It’s not a Health Care bill you liars! It’s a destroy America bill and kill off seniors bill.


44 posted on 12/23/2009 8:32:58 PM PST by ExTexasRedhead (Clean the RAT/RINO Sewer in 2010 and 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

I agree with you Cicero, this somehow appears fake since this woman clearly had to have voted for the bill. I pray that the infighting and competition becomes so severe that they all end up in a “virtual tower of babel” and get absolutely NOTHING done. What is Obama going to threating to kill everyone’s family? Dissention can be good no??? CO


45 posted on 12/23/2009 9:32:51 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what medicine is to a wound - HEALING!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

Coming from and living with Socialist healthcare you are absoslutely correct!! I KNOW, I have seen it. Our system is now moving away from Socialized medicine. It becomes completely overloaded, the doctors and nurses leave, the service is deplorable and on and on. I was a Registered Nurse in the 70’s - it was very good then but then it became overloaded. Yours will be even worse, it’s starting out overloaded. It’s a complete and utter disaster. At least we are now being given the opportunity to pay for private healthcare clinics for MRI’s, minor surgeries, all sorts of things. It at least frees up the local hospitals. But all in all, private insurance is the best. However, I have American cousins who tell me that they pay a huge amount for premiums and they still have huge deductibles. Also, there is the fact that in the event of a catastrophic illness, the insurance runs out???? I would need to see that fixed. This is not an easy problem but it is a problem that a Commie t*rd like Obama is NOT qualified to handle. CO


46 posted on 12/23/2009 9:43:28 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what medicine is to a wound - HEALING!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

She means it. She doesn’t think the bill serves the far left well enough. P.O.d about cutting the public option, etc.


47 posted on 12/23/2009 10:12:03 PM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kabar
tiger is a tiger is a tiger. These are Dems. They have an overwhelming majority in Congress. They will pass a health care bill. The only question is what is in it. This infighting should not give Reps any hope or solace. We do know that there will be mandated health care forcing everyone and every business to join. We do know that they will establish the standards for what acceptable health insurance will include. They are setting the standards and profit margins, which will limit and eventually destroy private insurance in this country. Any bill is a bad bill regardless of whether a public option is in it or not. There will be a de facto public option regardless. Don't be fooled by the rhetoric or the good cop, bad cop routine.

There is no reason for rhetoric, espically if you plan to vote for the Bill in the end!

They hold all the power, yet, unlike the Senate, where many Senators don't come up for reelection next year, all of House members do.

There won't be a Bluedog who survives if they vote for this Bill.

On the Left, if they betray their own base, they might defeated by another Democrat in a primary.

I believe the hostility to this Bill is real and all we need is a 5 vote swing in the House to kill it.

My bet is that it doesn't even get out of committee.

The Senate version would never pass the House.

48 posted on 12/24/2009 8:03:24 AM PST by fortheDeclaration ("Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people".-John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
There is no reason for rhetoric, espically if you plan to vote for the Bill in the end!

The rhetoric is to placate their base. Listen to what Harkin had to say about this just being the "starter home" to the mansion.

There won't be a Bluedog who survives if they vote for this Bill.

Who really knows? And why would the Blue Dogs, many of whom voted for the stimulus package and cap and trade think that voting for this bill will hurt them any worse than voting against it? Sen Burris said the choice is between hanging together or separately. And the Dem leadership can threaten them by having them challenged in the primary, cutting off campaign money, and changing committee assignments. The Dems control the House 262-178.

I believe the hostility to this Bill is real and all we need is a 5 vote swing in the House to kill it. My bet is that it doesn't even get out of committee. The Senate version would never pass the House.

You are wrong on all counts. The Senate version will be the main one with a few tweaks. Pelosi can get through anything she wants. She will allow some Dems to vote no for their protection and cover. It is all orchestrated behind the scenes. They don't bring anything up for a vote unless they know the votes beforehand.

Obamacare must pass for the Dems. They have too much invested in its passage including the rest of Obama's agenda. Once the framework is passed, the bill can be changed and modified to suit the needs of the base. For the Dems, failure is not an option. With such overwhelming majorities in both Houses, they must pass as much as they can before the midterms. With Obama in the WH, none of this stuff can be repealed or pushed back. The Reps won't have veto proof majorities even under the most rosy scenarios.

49 posted on 12/24/2009 8:54:29 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: kabar
[There is no reason for rhetoric, espically if you plan to vote for the Bill in the end! ]

The rhetoric is to placate their base. Listen to what Harkin had to say about this just being the "starter home" to the mansion.

Neither the pro-life people or the public-option people are going to be 'placated' by a yes vote on this Bill.

Both groups have strong views on the issue.

There won't be a Bluedog who survives if they vote for this Bill.

Who really knows? And why would the Blue Dogs, many of whom voted for the stimulus package and cap and trade think that voting for this bill will hurt them any worse than voting against it? Sen Burris said the choice is between hanging together or separately. And the Dem leadership can threaten them by having them challenged in the primary, cutting off campaign money, and changing committee assignments. The Dems control the House 262-178.

Well, on one hand, we are told that the Bluedogs were given 'cover' and that is why the first vote was so close, but on the other hand they are going to now vote 'yes' on a Bill that doesn't even contain a strong pro-life provision?

I don't say that Pelosi won't twist arms, but the fact is that the Senate version is not acceptable to to many House members to survive a simple up or down vote.

[ I believe the hostility to this Bill is real and all we need is a 5 vote swing in the House to kill it. My bet is that it doesn't even get out of committee. The Senate version would never pass the House. ]

You are wrong on all counts. The Senate version will be the main one with a few tweaks. Pelosi can get through anything she wants. She will allow some Dems to vote no for their protection and cover. It is all orchestrated behind the scenes. They don't bring anything up for a vote unless they know the votes beforehand.

Well, Pelosi can't get through anything she wants when she is opposed by major sections of her own Party.

And you are correct, nothing will be voted on unless they have the votes, that is why I believe it won't be brought back to voted on in the House, it will die in conference.

And the Senate version if changed at all, can be blocked again in the Senate.

As this Bill gets to be more known, the opposition will increase, not decrease.

Obamacare must pass for the Dems. They have too much invested in its passage including the rest of Obama's agenda. Once the framework is passed, the bill can be changed and modified to suit the needs of the base. For the Dems, failure is not an option. With such overwhelming majorities in both Houses, they must pass as much as they can before the midterms. With Obama in the WH, none of this stuff can be repealed or pushed back. The Reps won't have veto proof majorities even under the most rosy scenarios.

The Democrats will not have the House after 2010 if they pass the Senate version unchanged.

Many House members know that.

Obama isn't growing more popular and each House member knows he is the one who has face the voters wrath in Nov, not Obama.

As this Bill gets pushed back into Feb and March and more details come out, it will break into pieces and die.

50 posted on 12/24/2009 10:13:33 AM PST by fortheDeclaration ("Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people".-John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: kabar

The Senate health care bill is dead on arrival in the House of Representatives unless major changes are made, including removal of special “carve outs” for Medicaid funding for certain states and inclusion of language barring taxpayer-funded health plans that cover abortions, Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) told CNSNews.com on Tuesday.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2414547/posts


51 posted on 12/24/2009 10:17:15 AM PST by fortheDeclaration ("Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people".-John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: kabar
No, just another Lucy and the football moment. They like to raise Rep hopes and then crush them. It is meant to dispirit and demoralize.

No, this Bill is not going past the House.

You think House members want to explain to their voters why they voted for the Senate version with all its special perks and pro-abortion language?

Reid put something together so he could say he got a Bill, he knows it will never survive Committee.

52 posted on 12/24/2009 10:19:29 AM PST by fortheDeclaration ("Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people".-John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: onyx
She’s one of how many democrats? 255? This is laughable.

The House Bill barely passed.

We only need a few votes to switch to kill the Senate Bill.

The House members are going to hear from their districts how unpopular this Bill is, even among the Left!

53 posted on 12/24/2009 10:21:31 AM PST by fortheDeclaration ("Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people".-John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: earlJam
Another article today said that the White House is preparing for a FEBRUARY battle because the fight is going to take much longer than hoped. As we all know, February starts the political season. The Dems will not be able to run and hide at that point.

The longer it takes, the more likely it is to die.

Just like the Amnesty Bill, which they hoped to push past the American people and died when it was dragged out.

54 posted on 12/24/2009 10:22:55 AM PST by fortheDeclaration ("Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people".-John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kidd
Through bribes and/or arm twisting, this thing will pass. Its no longer about medical care, its about image. Dear Leader must have something to talk about at the State of the Union address.

No, he will claim victory, but in reality, the Bill will never make it out of committee.

Too much opposition to it already-even from Democrats!

55 posted on 12/24/2009 10:24:15 AM PST by fortheDeclaration ("Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people".-John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

Don’t believe this BS. Lieberman made his demands. So did Nelson. Pelosi et al will figure a way out so everyone can save face. This is just Lucy and the football. Hope will rise and then be dashed. It is part of the Dem water torture to weaken the opposition.


56 posted on 12/24/2009 10:31:35 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
No, he will claim victory, but in reality, the Bill will never make it out of committee. Too much opposition to it already-even from Democrats!

You are deluded. The bill will be passed and it will be essentially the Senate version. We need to now concentrate on attacking it and responding to the Dem spin effort, which will do Goebbels proud.

57 posted on 12/24/2009 10:36:02 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
With the White House reportedly expecting the health care debate to go into February, it seems House Democrats aren’t going to roll over and play dead, as New York Rep. Louise Slaughter made clear. Instead they plan to play, then roll over dead.
58 posted on 12/24/2009 10:39:46 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

I watched the vote. I know it was close.
I’d love nothing more than for this bill to be killed, but that would be a political miracle. “His” presidency is centered around the passage of this authoritarian legislation is some form.


59 posted on 12/24/2009 11:42:41 AM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: onyx
I watched the vote. I know it was close. I’d love nothing more than for this bill to be killed, but that would be a political miracle. “His” presidency is centered around the passage of this authoritarian legislation is some form.

The more the truth comes out on these BILLS, not 'Bill' the more they will be rejected by the public.

The delay in voting to reconcile will only lead to more pressure on the House Democrats.

If they want this to be their last term, they can vote for the Senate version with it's pro-abortion language.

The Democrats retook the House by running anti-abortion Democrats in conservative districts.

They won't survive voting for the Senate version.

60 posted on 12/24/2009 4:09:51 PM PST by fortheDeclaration ("Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people".-John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson