Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Raising the Banner for Creation Truth (according to the evos, these men and women aren't scientists)
ICR ^ | December 2009 | Various Authors

Posted on 12/07/2009 8:33:19 AM PST by GodGunsGuts

Dr. Henry M. Morris founded the Institute for Creation Research in 1970 with a vision to uncover and present evidence for the accuracy and authority of the Bible. For almost 40 years, ICR has distinguished itself as the leader in creation science research and education, ably assisted by the many fine scientists whom God has led to work here. These men and women have dedicated their training and skills to raising the banner for the truth of our Creator God. We would like you to meet our current on-site scientists and hear their thoughts on the purpose, significance, and importance of the creation science research they do...

(Excerpt) Read more at icr.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: absolutebs; antiscience; belongsinreligion; bible; biology; bovinescat; catholic; christian; christianright; creation; crevolist; engineering; evangelical; evolution; genesis; geology; god; godsgravesglyphs; intelligentdesign; notasciencetopic; paleontology; propellerbeanie; protestant; rickydylan; science; spammer; tedholden; velikovsky
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-235 next last
Comment #161 Removed by Moderator

To: Friendofgeorge; Ira_Louvin
"WOW Ira, you are one angry dude! I wondered why you attacked me out of the blue ..."

Your delusion is comprehensive and impressive.

This thread is not yet so long that a dispassionate observer could not review the posts in question to see who among us is displaying anger.

Astonishing!

162 posted on 12/07/2009 6:08:33 PM PST by NicknamedBob (It seems to me that a wise PALINa woman would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Merry Christmas, Jim


163 posted on 12/07/2009 6:13:33 PM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Friendofgeorge

So I point out the fact that you misstated the definition of a scientific theory and suggest that you educate yourself as to be able to make an informed decision on a subject on which you obviously misunderstand and your response is “Eat my shorts”

Then you accuse me of being angry and question my faith.

I am a Christian who is secure enough in my faith accept the overwhelming evidence supporting the evolutionary theory.

Might I suggest that in addition to the class in remedial science you might also want to study Matthew 7: 1~2


164 posted on 12/07/2009 7:12:23 PM PST by Ira_Louvin (Go tell them people lost in sin, Theres a higher power ,They need not fear the works of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Ira_Louvin
Really my point is this....Many scientists and or wanna be scientists, are simply educated beyond their intelligence. That`s really what I was trying to say.

God speed

165 posted on 12/07/2009 7:15:43 PM PST by Friendofgeorge ( SARAH PALIN or BUST.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Well then I will give you a chance to answer a question I have asked of you several times now without an answer.

Please explain why we find no trilobites above the Permian strata, and why we find no dinosaurs above the cretaceous strata, or no mammals in the Cambrian strata?


166 posted on 12/07/2009 7:18:24 PM PST by Ira_Louvin (Go tell them people lost in sin, Theres a higher power ,They need not fear the works of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Ira_Louvin; metmom
"Please explain why we find no trilobites above the Permian strata, and why we find no dinosaurs above the cretaceous strata, or no mammals in the Cambrian strata?"

I would suspect that scientific analysis of religious beliefs, and biblical interpretations of geological and biological data, will equally come to no particular accord.

167 posted on 12/07/2009 7:29:06 PM PST by NicknamedBob (It seems to me that a wise PALINa woman would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Ira_Louvin

I answered it.


168 posted on 12/07/2009 7:34:23 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob

Nice attempt at misdirection, but that does not answer the question.


169 posted on 12/07/2009 7:42:38 PM PST by Ira_Louvin (Go tell them people lost in sin, Theres a higher power ,They need not fear the works of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Oh yes that is right, you replied that you did not know.

Too bad that the evolutionary theory provides the most plausible answer, but your anti-science bias will not allow you to accept the obvious answer.


170 posted on 12/07/2009 7:43:50 PM PST by Ira_Louvin (Go tell them people lost in sin, Theres a higher power ,They need not fear the works of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I love science. Just like evolution, it’s one of God’s greatest creations.

Microevolution or the ability of animal species to adapt to changing conditions is certainly attributable to God. Macroevolution is what the theory of evolution is about and is basically an ideological doctrine masquerading as a science theory with something like 200 million dead bodies lying around to its credit. I have a hard time picturing God being behind anything like that.

171 posted on 12/07/2009 8:25:03 PM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

[[I expect you there’s quite a potential for mischief written between the lines.]]

so you’re finally admitting it? That you kick small dogs, drink goats blood durign winter solstace, and worship Darwin’s ghost when noone is looking? I knew it and all it took was the above confession by you- finally- Thnaks for beign frank


172 posted on 12/07/2009 8:26:01 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: CottShop
so you’re finally admitting it? That you kick small dogs, drink goats blood durign winter solstace, and worship Darwin’s ghost when noone is looking? I knew it and all it took was the above confession by you- finally- Thnaks for beign frank

I'm not Frank. I've never been Frank. You have the wrong number. Hang up now, and don't call back.

173 posted on 12/07/2009 8:28:47 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

[[I’m not Frank. I’ve never been Frank. You have the wrong number. Hang up now, and don’t call back.]]

You say you’rew not Frank- but reading between the lines tells me you don’t really want me to hang up, and that you’ve decalred ID was correct all along- You’re just full of between the l ien admission tonight


174 posted on 12/07/2009 8:33:49 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

[[No hidden conspiracies or motives. God’s truth always wins out.]]

That is true- but I’m goign to have to ditto GGG’s reply-

[[True enough. I’m just having a hard time understanding why an obvious disruptor, who is now an admitted DC troll, who brags about the possibility of getting banned any day now, and who promises to turn up the heat and make everybody’s life even more miserable the longer they manage to evade getting banned...well, I just don’t understand why people like this are allowed to stick around, that’s all.]]

[[“Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me.”]]

Yes, but hte rod and staff are used to beat down the trolls that come to annoy everyone- the staff is usually pretty effective especially when the annoying trolls asked to be beaten liek dogs


175 posted on 12/07/2009 8:33:56 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: CottShop
You say you’rew not Frank- but reading between the lines tells me you don’t really want me to hang up, and that you’ve decalred ID was correct all along- You’re just full of between the l ien admission tonight

Your ability to read mischief into that void is impressive. Now, what's it good for?

176 posted on 12/07/2009 8:36:06 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

[[Your ability to read mischief into that void is impressive. Now, what’s it good for?]]

It was a joke in rersponse to your statement abotu how much mischeif coudl be had readign between the lines- I forgot you had your funny bone removed after the accident- please do forgive me


177 posted on 12/07/2009 8:40:23 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: CottShop
It was a joke in rersponse to your statement abotu how much mischeif coudl be had readign between the lines- I forgot you had your funny bone removed after the accident- please do forgive me

Really? So how much of what I've taken to be accusations of spiritual deficiency have be you trying to be funny? I may have misunderstood you.

178 posted on 12/07/2009 8:43:34 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic; CottShop
"I may have misunderstood you."

Post of the day.

179 posted on 12/07/2009 8:48:20 PM PST by NicknamedBob (It seems to me that a wise PALINa woman would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

[[Really? So how much of what I’ve taken to be accusations of spiritual deficiency have be you trying to be funny?]]

I assume you’re referrign to the other thread? (Since I certainly didn’t do that here) IF so, That was a different thread and in response to the quote you posted which I assumed you must have felt likewise to have posted the quote- Are you goign to carry aroudn that thread to eacjh new thread? I thought perhaps that thread was over withj, but apaprently you haven’t let go? I’ve certainly let go of the nasty thigns you’ve said about me TL- it’s over with- points were made, and I’ll stand by mine- you’ll stand by yours, life will go on- I guess your claim to ‘agree to dissagree agreably’ wasn’t really heartfelt after all eh? forgive me- I misread once again- guess I shoulda read between the liens i nthe other thread-


180 posted on 12/07/2009 8:49:22 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-235 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson