Skip to comments.
Darwinizing Everything
CEH ^
| November 16, 2009
Posted on 11/17/2009 6:55:46 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
Darwinizing Everything
--snip--
The Darwinians, who took over biology in the 19th century, are still busily engaged in mythmaking, comforting the feebleminded who accept their explanations as wisdom, denouncing the heretics who call their bluff. They wear S on their chests: Science, the equivalent of Superman in intellectual circles. They are phonies. Bring out the kryptonite of critical analysis. It scares them to death, even though they never had special powers to begin with...
(Excerpt) Read more at creationsafaris.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Florida; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: alarmingevoidiocy; alarmingidiocy; alunaticscreed; antiscienceevos; atomsdonotexist; belongsinreligion; biology; catholic; christian; christianity; christianright; creation; darwindrones; darwiniacs; electricityisfire; evangelical; evolution; evoreligionexposed; godsgravesglyphs; gravityisahoax; idiotfanatics; intelligentdesign; judaism; notasciencetopic; propellerbeanie; protestant; religiousright; science; scienceisalie; spammer; templeofdarwin; truthhurtsevos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
To: GodGunsGuts
after all, bad press is better than no press!well ... you are the expert at bad press.
21
posted on
11/17/2009 8:08:17 PM PST
by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: count-your-change
Think of it as protection bananas...yeah, that’s it!
To: GodGunsGuts
Better yet, lets see if we can dupe people into believing that the complex, specified, super-sophisticated, digital DNA code was assembled by pond-scum plus lightening!I believe that the complex, super-sophisticated, digital DNA code was assembled by the Mendellian geneticists and the Hippocratic Doctors ---- the same Satanic goons who claim HIV causes AIDS, that washing your hands frequently reduces your chances of catching the common cold, and that John Wilkes Booth shot Abe Lincoln.
23
posted on
11/17/2009 8:20:18 PM PST
by
Alter Kaker
(Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
To: Alter Kaker
==I believe
That's all darwood's evo-religious creation myth is, a belief about the unobservable, unrepeatable past. But hey, I have an idea. Let's pretend our belief is the same thing as science and label all challenges to our belief religion! Boy are we smart!!!
To: Alter Kaker
I’d rather have Hippocrates as my physician than Darwin given a choice.
25
posted on
11/17/2009 8:35:18 PM PST
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: GodGunsGuts
26
posted on
11/17/2009 9:05:11 PM PST
by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: Alter Kaker
I believe that the complex, super-sophisticated, digital DNA code was assembled by the Mendellian geneticists and the Hippocratic Doctors ----
ok. But who assembled the "Mendellian geneticists and the Hippocratic Doctors"? ;^)
27
posted on
11/17/2009 9:10:29 PM PST
by
BlueDragon
(there is no such thing as a "true" compass, all are subject to both variation & deviation)
To: count-your-change
Id rather have Hippocrates as my physician than Darwin given a choice.Fitting. He separated the discipline of medicine from religion, believing and arguing that disease was not a punishment inflicted by the gods but rather the product of environmental factors, diet, and living habits.
wikipedia.com
28
posted on
11/17/2009 9:11:10 PM PST
by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: GodGunsGuts
To: Alter Kaker
I havent had any use for the field of cartography since Mercator.
Simple solution: go conical. It would help if you were to move to the far North, or far South, though.
If the cartoons still didn't suit you for lookin' @, you could always use 'em for a hat... I hear it gets cold at the far ends.
30
posted on
11/17/2009 9:16:20 PM PST
by
BlueDragon
(there is no such thing as a "true" compass, all are subject to both variation & deviation)
To: GodGunsGuts
BamaKennedy is using the ‘scientific methodology’ as part of his governing process. Time will tell how many still favor that system when Bama gets done with them.
To: GodGunsGuts
Speaking of bananas I dont understand why you dont cite this piece of irrefutable evidence of i/d?
Link
32
posted on
11/17/2009 9:25:34 PM PST
by
Ira_Louvin
(Go tell them people lost in sin, Theres a higher power ,They need not fear the works of men.)
To: ColdWater; GodGunsGuts
Your posts remind me of a hundred monkeys typing on a hundred typewriters for a hundred hours. Only the monkeys make more sense ... Aren't you being a bit schizoid? According to your belief if he reminds you of a hundred monkeys typing on a hundred typewriters for a hundred hours he should be making perfect sense. In fact he should be putting out literature that puts Shakespeare to utter shame.
33
posted on
11/17/2009 9:40:56 PM PST
by
Bellflower
(If you are left DO NOT take the mark of the beast and be damned forever.)
To: Bellflower
In fact he should be putting out literature that puts Shakespeare to utter shame. Perhaps, but the monkeys put him to shame.
34
posted on
11/17/2009 10:31:54 PM PST
by
ColdWater
("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
To: GodGunsGuts
My experience has been somewhat different. I was in favor of ID being taught in schools as promoted by the Discovery Institute , but I didn’t pay much attention to the issue. As a lawyer, I was surprised at the Dover outcome and, for the first time, researched the legal side of Dover in detail. What I “discovered” was that the Discovery Institute was full of crap when it came to understanding the basic legal issues surrounding Dover. The DI’s articles after Dover reflected a complete misunderstanding of fundamental law. Since DI was way off base on something as simple as basic law, I questioned whether they had any credibility on something as complex as evolution. My research indicated that they did not have such credibility and I’m no longer in favor of “teaching the controversy.”
To: GodGunsGuts; Alter Kaker
Might have to give this round to Alter Kaker. He types the loudest...
Do either of you think you will change the other’s mind?
These threads are getting to be like pro wrestling.
36
posted on
11/17/2009 11:12:02 PM PST
by
Blue Collar Christian
(I forget the last time I made a mistake. It's handy. ><BCC> NRA)
To: GodGunsGuts
The Darwinians, who took over biology in the 19th century, Darwin's theory of natural selection wasn't widely accepted science until well into the 20th century.
37
posted on
11/17/2009 11:14:49 PM PST
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: ColdWater; GodGunsGuts
Perhaps, but the monkeys put him to shame. Only in the mind of someone that could say "perhaps".
38
posted on
11/18/2009 12:53:54 AM PST
by
Bellflower
(If you are left DO NOT take the mark of the beast and be damned forever.)
To: GodGunsGuts
Whenever I want unbiased opinion
about Science I always go to the
Creation/Evolution Headlines.
39
posted on
11/18/2009 4:29:38 AM PST
by
DoctorMichael
(Creationists: The crazy Aunts and Uncles of Conservatism.)
To: GodGunsGuts
Are we still pretending the ID is empirically verified?
40
posted on
11/18/2009 4:41:46 AM PST
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson