Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate panel approves Democratic climate bill
reuters ^ | 11/5/2009 | Rueters

Posted on 11/05/2009 6:44:30 AM PST by mikelets456

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on Thursday approved a Democratic climate change bill that would require industry to cut emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases 20 percent by 2020 from 2005 levels.

With Republicans boycotting the committee's work saying more analysis of the legislation was needed, 10 Democrats voted to approve the legislation and one Democrat, Senator Max Baucus, voted against it.

The bill will now become one of several initiatives aimed at attacking global warming. Senator John Kerry is leading an effort with some Republicans and the White House to craft a compromise bill, which likely would not be voted on by the full Senate until next year at the earliest.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: climate; cost; economykiller; globalwarming; healthcare; military; obama; palin; senate; tax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: mikelets456

This bill is dead. There’s no way the Senate will pass cap and trade in an election year. Same goes with ObamaCare. We need to keep the delay games going. If it gets pushed to the next congress, they have to start all over.


41 posted on 11/05/2009 7:17:06 AM PST by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

They don’t think it matters.

Their plan is to pass “take over of medicine,” pass “tax and bleed,” and initiate the “carbon-credit market.”

They’ll do that as fast as possible.

And then they will grant amnesty to all the illegals in this country AND THOSE CURRENTLY IN LINE TO BECOME CITIZENS LEGALLY. It will be passed in one fell swoop.

At that point, the DNC will be able to look at all the fairly conservative Dems, the independents and moderates, and flip them the bird with a big, smug smile.


42 posted on 11/05/2009 7:18:23 AM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (I'd rather be a teabagger than an ankle-grabber.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

nuclear option...

Barbara Boxer plans to bypass Republicans on climate vote

Senate Environment and Public Works Chairwoman Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) plans to exploit a committee loophole and completely bypass the GOP on Thursday if Republicans continue their boycott of the legislative markup, according to Democratic aides and lobbyists.

Republicans have refused to attend the markup of the legislation until the Environmental Protection Agency delivers an additional analysis of the bill.

Some aides have described this decision to pass a bill without any Republicans present as a “nuclear option” because it bypasses the usual custom of having a few Republicans there for a quorum.

EPW Committee rules state that opening a “business meeting” requires one-third of the members of the committee, including two members of the minority party. But legislation can be approved by the committee with a simple majority of members, an exception Boxer could use to pass her bill.

More...

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29175.html


43 posted on 11/05/2009 7:22:05 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

We’ll need lawsuits against this and the healthcare bill. The only way they can be stopped is in the courts. I hope to God someone is planning to sue. The Supreme Court is the only way to stop them from turning the US into a socialized country.


44 posted on 11/05/2009 7:25:51 AM PST by b4its2late (Before you can control a horse, you have to break it. Sound familiar?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

Bump


45 posted on 11/05/2009 7:30:44 AM PST by windcliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

Here is a thread about the rule.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2378551/posts

So here we are at the second day of Kerry-Boxer markup and the second day Boxer chose to proceed without GOP representation, despite committee rules requiring two members of the minority be present in order to provide a quorum for a markup.

It seems Boxer cited a “provision in the rules” she claims allows her to proceed as long as a majority of committee members are present. Not that I don’t trust her, although I most certainly do not, but I thought a quick trip over to the EPW rules site for a look-see was in order.

Now, according to Rule 2 of the committee rules: [my emphasis]
“At committee business meetings, and for the purpose of approving the issuance of a subpoena or approving a committee resolution, one third of the members of the committee, at least two of whom are members of the minority party, constitute a quorum, except as provided in subsection (d).”

And it appears to be the language of subsection (d) that Boxer is attempting to play games with:
“No measure or matter may be reported to the Senate by the committee unless a majority of committee members cast votes in person.”

From a layman’s reading, one would surmise that although the bill can be reported out of committee with a simple majority, at least 2 Republicans need be present to consider any amendments. In which case, Boxer’s decision to continue markup sessions without minority representation would be as illegal as it is unprecedented.


46 posted on 11/05/2009 7:30:54 AM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

Oh, Kerry is leading a compromise effort? Well, he’ll have McLame, his butt-monkey Graham, Snowe and Collins to go along.


47 posted on 11/05/2009 7:37:03 AM PST by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Bingo Louis. Too many Freepers are running around in despondent panic over these two good-as-dead bills. No way dumbocare or crap n trade pass.


48 posted on 11/05/2009 7:42:41 AM PST by HerrBlucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

I wish I could say I am shocked too, but nobody was paying attention last week or cared when calls needed to go to the committee...

Live Committee Hearing on Kerry-Boxer Bill (Cap & Trade, Smart Grid)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2372872/posts

Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act
http://kerry.senate.gov/cleanenergyjobsandamericanpower/pdf/bill.pdf


49 posted on 11/05/2009 7:47:44 AM PST by EBH (it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quesney
Anything not viewed as an entitlement is easily undone.

It is nothing but a tax basically, which is easily undone with the equivalent of a tax cut.

50 posted on 11/05/2009 7:48:57 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied, the economy died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Actually the rules for the EPW committee say 2 minority party for mark-up quorum, not for voting it out of committee.


51 posted on 11/05/2009 7:49:11 AM PST by EBH (it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative
I do not mean to sound "nasty", but please explain what makes you so sure or confident these evil marxists won't pass this? Also, I think they know this is their only chance before blue dogs jump ship.... i think they'll try to pass it ANY way they can... even illegally. Do you think I am wrong?
52 posted on 11/05/2009 7:49:35 AM PST by mikelets456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

Is this one of the bills aimed at killing the coal company’s that Obama said he was going to do?
Just another way of distroying America, something every week if not everyday.
Between golf and the parties.


53 posted on 11/05/2009 7:54:47 AM PST by sunny48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

Unless Obamaniac scraps elections, you are ALL losing your seats.


54 posted on 11/05/2009 7:54:47 AM PST by Lazamataz (DEFINITION: rac-ist (rA'sis't) 1. Anyone who disagrees with a liberal about any topic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quesney
What makes you say that? I have yet to see any example from DC of any big, bad legislation made law ever being completely reversed.

The Assault Weapons bill of 1993.

55 posted on 11/05/2009 7:58:25 AM PST by Lazamataz (DEFINITION: rac-ist (rA'sis't) 1. Anyone who disagrees with a liberal about any topic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456
MASSIVE MIDDLE CLASS TAX INCREASE!!!
56 posted on 11/05/2009 7:58:51 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (November 3, 2009, America says: "FUBO!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

The commies are at it again. What next? Billions to fight cobwebs? Can spider webs be far behind? Excessive dew?


57 posted on 11/05/2009 8:08:43 AM PST by Waco (Stay as bootiful as ya are Karvile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

most corrupt congress, biggest liars and they have ignored the constitution more than any other congress or Govt


58 posted on 11/05/2009 8:08:55 AM PST by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman, end of. -end racism end affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456; scripter; proud_yank; grey_whiskers; FrPR; enough_idiocy; Desdemona; rdl6989; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

59 posted on 11/05/2009 8:27:00 AM PST by steelyourfaith (Limit all U.S. politicians to two terms: One in office and one in prison! to s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

{*require industry to cut emissions*}Anyone want to take a guess where the cost will be pass on to go ahead take a wild guess.


60 posted on 11/05/2009 9:09:24 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson