Posted on 10/26/2009 7:51:02 AM PDT by Scythian
I'm a huge Beck fan, in fact I'm listening right now here
http://www.ksfa860.com/common/gap_streamer.php
but something really confuses me. It takes the ability to use real critical thinking to know what Beck (and most of us know about the state of the country and where we are heading). That is, we have the ability to discover the truth no matter how much the media or conventional wisdom try to hide it. Yet on Mormonism, Beck is cleary wrong. Any Christian knows that the book or momonism is severely flawed and that Joseph Smith was no prophet. How can Beck cut through all the chaff of what is going on in our world and come to the truth and yet believe the writings of Joseph Smith? It doesn't make sense? I'm not saying he's up to something secret, not by any means, it's just that he's so right about so many things and completely wrong on the most important thing. Now, he just said on the air that he believes Jesus is the Savior of the world and that he is Mormon.
I also think that because he is Mormon he is not attacked near as much if he was a Evangelical Bible only believer. Anyway, am I nutz or does Beck being a Mormon seem bizarre?
Amazing, thanks!
Glenn Beck does a great job on TV saying what any Conservative is saying in these oBama times. Beck is not believable.
Now, let's examine the quote on your profile page by Helen Keller, activist member of the Socialist Party, and Communist sympathizer:
"Alone we can do so little; together we can do so much."- Helen Keller
Of all the quotes in the world, you chose the penned thoughts of a committed socialist to reflect your persona. Is it conceivable you didn't realize your quote reflects socialism? NoRedTape's foundation is suspect; it is cracked from the socialist cult. And that is very sad.
Sorry man, that doesn't make sense with ANY approach of attempted justification in a conservative forum.
Here's another nifty quote you can add to your profile. It fits squarely with your other socialist quote:
It takes a village to raise a child. - Hillary Clinton
Sorry; but if you post something that I wish to comment on; I will.
There is too much false information coming from LDS, Inc. to let it slide.
If you wish to defend the Organization® with some facts; go right ahead.
You're a big hit w/ the anti cabal, but I think you can see, you kind of grate on the rest.
I'll 'translate' this as:
"You are good with your Biblical and MORMON quotes; but it upsets the MORMONs for we cannot counter what our Leaders have written."
The Official Scriptures of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints © 2006 Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved. |
Don't you just HATE it when folks will not do your bidding?
You guys are starting to gang up on me - I'll have to have a good cry.
As a patient or doctor?
Glen said it; not me.
Oh; believe me - I don't!
What they get judged on is the FACT that there are NO new 'writings' to trump the old ones.
I can let Liberals slide when the want to call the Constitution a Living Document, but I have a REAL hard time when 'conservatives' treat their SCRIPTUREs as the same!
Thank the countless and nameless people who have DIED bringing these very words to us over the centuries.
I am not the one citing this account (Joseph Smith History 1:18-20), you started that (as far as I am aware) on this thread, nor am I the one now changing the subject by referring to other accounts.
I'm a huge Beck fan, in fact I'm listening right now here http://www.ksfa860.com/common/gap_streamer.php but something really confuses me. It takes the ability to use real critical thinking to know what Beck (and most of us know about the state of the country and where we are heading). That is, we have the ability to discover the truth no matter how much the media or conventional wisdom try to hide it. Yet on Mormonism, Beck is cleary wrong. Any Christian knows that the book or momonism is severely flawed and that Joseph Smith was no prophet. How can Beck cut through all the chaff of what is going on in our world and come to the truth and yet believe the writings of Joseph Smith? It doesn't make sense? I'm not saying he's up to something secret, not by any means, it's just that he's so right about so many things and completely wrong on the most important thing. Now, he just said on the air that he believes Jesus is the Savior of the world and that he is Mormon. I also think that because he is Mormon he is not attacked near as much if he was a Evangelical Bible only believer. Anyway, am I nutz or does Beck being a Mormon seem bizarre? |
...horse story... ?
HORSE STORY??
ALL of MORMONism is BUILT on the assertion that ALL of CHRISTIANITY is flawed - esPECIALLY PRESBYTERIANism!
(Just ask RESTORNU)
Alright, I know it's Halloween week -- but could we please stop with the Lds masquerade you're putting up here to try to soften what Mormon "revelation" reveals? As you mentioned, this is the second post where you've cited 2 Nephi 28:14 to try to elevate the notion that Mormons supposedly recognize "a few...humble followers of Christ."
No one's going to catch you in this deception unless they have a copy of the Book of Mormon and note that Lds say that 2 Nephi 28:14 was supposedly written between 559 and 545 B.C.!!! -- or almost 600 years before Christ even was born!!!
(Of course, non-Mormons would then ask, "Joachim, ya wanna explain how only a few followers of Christ remained when he hadn't even been born as a Bethlehem baby til almost 600 years later?" But aside from that hard-to-swallow tale, all your quoting of 2 Nephi 28:14--even in its proper Mormon "historical" context means -- is that Lds will concede that not all of Christ's followers had apostacized as of 5-6 centuries BEFORE Christ was born! That's it!)
BYU prof Kent Jackson, in his Lds Ensign article on the so-called complete Christian apostasy, writes: By a.d. 95 only John remained, as far as we know...The apostasy did not happen because the Apostles were gone; the Apostles were taken because the apostasy had occurred. EarlySignsOfTheApostasy
Will you be forthright with lurkers and myself and concede that 2 Nephi 28:14 doesn't even address the time period of the post-resurrection Christ or the church He established among His disciples? (Please, please, please, in the name of intellectual integrity, drop this wrestling-out-of-historical context)
My previous post:: Again, what's Smith['s] broader view of Christian people? When asked 'Will everybody be damned, but Mormons'? [Smith replied] 'Yes, and a great portion of them, unless they repent, and work righteousness." (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 119).
Your response: You see this as "Smith's broader view of Christian people." Mormons would see it as Smith's view of the authority of Christian leaders after the time of the apostles to receive revelation, teach doctrine and perform ordinances such as baptism.
I guess I had to chuckle at the lengths you're proceeding to avoid the obvious. I mean just look how you've...
...redefined a clear Joseph Smith reference to "everybody" (ToPJS, p. 119 quote above)...
...& then conveniently narrowed the scope to "Smith's view of the authority of Christian LEADERS" just to make this all nice & tidy with your pre-existing assumptions about Joseph Smith v. 19.
So let me try this again, this time with a multiple-choice test, just to see if you're going to stick to your story:
When Joseph Smith answered 'Yes, and a great portion of them, unless they repent, and work righteousness." to the Q, 'Will EVERYBODY be damned, but Mormons'?, Smith really was referencing "EVERYBODY" as...
Choice A Christian LEADERS only
Choice B Everybody
Choice C Readers are simply free to "agree or disagree as they will" and insert anything they want to replace the meaning of "Everybody" according to their theological whims
The "professors" here who are "corrupt" are not generic christian believers, they are those that "teach . . . doctrine" as the quoted text goes, or, as mormons understand it, persons who claim to speak for God but without authority. Mormons do not understand this scripture to say that all Christian believers are (or were) corrupt. You don't need a specific special meaning of "professors" to understand this--just look at it in context--"professors" in this case teach doctrine--they are not the same as all Christian believers.
OK, so that we don't just go round and round on this one -- what vv. 18-19 says, and so that we really try to understand each other, let's try to weave both of our emphases into a merged interpretive summary:
Can we agree then that...
(1)...v. 18 twice references which SECT to join (which embodies ALL professing believers making up that sect)?
(2)...v. 19 specifically references what that sect teaches -- "they teach for doctrines the commandments of men"?
Even if I was to try on for size your point that Smith was primarily focusing on the teachers within these sects, who would that have included in 1820?
(a) Christian missionaries;
(b) Christian pastors;
(c) Christian writers;
(d) Christian administrative leaders;
(e) Christian evangelists like John Wesley;
(f) Christian hymn writers like John's brother, Charles, who died in 1788 [in fact, Lds hymnals include Charles Wesley's "Rejoice, the Lord is King" hymn (#66) as well as Martin Luther's "A Mighty Fortress" (#68)...and, 190 of the 358 Lds hymns in their book were written by non-Lds folks!]
(g) Christian teachers of children & adults -- which, frankly, as Lds & Christian home schoolers & Lds family home evening teachers show, includes even parents!
So, you're telling me, that...
...contemporary Mormons who realize that 2 Nephi 28:14 didn't apply to Christ's A.D. church...
...take Joseph Smith vv. 18-20 to mean that...
...the "corrupt professing believers" Smith mentioned...
...were "ALL" of the Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox missionaries, pastors, writers, administrators, evangelists, hymn writers, and teachers of children & adults within their denominational sects???
Wow! What a "relief!" Here I "thought" Smith was condemning ALL Christians as "corrupt." Instead, you're telling me, "Nope, the 'only' 'corrupt' ones were..."
...the hymn writers we incorporated into 53% of our hymnal book,
all your pastors,
all your missionaries,
all your evangelists,
all your writers,
all your teachers (broadly speaking),
and all your administrators.
(And this is all on top of us agreeing that Smith says ALL Christians embraced a track record of 100% false creeds)
What a "relief" Joachim. You've at least communicated well on the last excerpt I cited of yours -- but not really picked up much reassuring ground to the Christian community about Lds' portrayal of "tolerance" toward their Christian neighbors.
And, as it applies to this thread, my comment is: So Glenn Beck believes this about much of his audience -- what I just elaborated upon since it's both the founding Lds vision & it's Lds "scripture" to boot?
It is through the LDS faith that many of us have learn to discern and see clearly what is going on in the world today.
It just shows how little many critics really know about The (True) Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and the War in Heaven which is carried on today!
Stand Up For Freedom by Ezra Taft Benson
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3267931195706081875#
Of course it's bizarre. But no more bizarre than anyone else being a Mormon.
However, looking from outside, ANY religion looks bizarre. Including whichever one you subscribe to.
Liberals are trying to build a tyrannical government using their living document. Mormons do nothing of the kind. The comparison ends there. Let it drop; let them be.
placemarker
You need to get out more that flick is out dated now....
LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.