Posted on 09/15/2009 2:26:29 AM PDT by Future Useless Eater
A few quick snippets... Judge David Carter, Central District of California, ordered early discovery; Obama has 30 days to produce his records, including his hospital, birth certificate, name of doctor, and all of the signatures.
(Excerpt) Read more at mediamattersaction.org ...
Even if a candidate is required to submit a BC to the 50 Secretaries of State, what happens if they turn out to be forgeries but the SOSs accept them anyway??? or if the candidate doesn't turn one in at all and the SOS's just let it slide??? Once the lawless are entrenched in power, they will evade every law they choose while holding their opposition to every letter thereof -- as Obama's lemmings are doing right now.
With the revelation of the two different DNC documents, the question is now: Which one did the 50 SOS's accept from the DNC??? It is time to start camping out at the doors of the state AGs offices and demand some investigations of fraud in the SOS's offices.
The natural born citizen clause is the controlling law here and every politician knows it as evidenced by McCain's SR511. Where is Obama's SR511??? Since he doesn't meet the Senate's own requirements for natural born status, then what is he doing in the White House to begin with???
“My guess:
COLB shows Frank Marshall Davis as the REAL daddy...
Just my guess..”
This was one of the O’s cover story leaked to the press months ago.
“Lucy, all, please be prepared for significant news.”
Well don’t leave us hanging!!!!!
Just out of curiosity how many Kenyan BCs have you seen?
Since both Kenya and Australia were part of the same Empire, wouldn't they have had similar basic forms?
Sorry, but the idea that the Bomford certificate was modified from the alleged Obama certificate seems ridiculous to me. I've read the claims of people saying it, and all I can see in those is that they know very little about computer graphic formats - they're using normal artifacts caused by scanning, and image compression as evidence it's a fake. Well, no, it's just evidence it's been scanned and saved on a computer. David Bomford has confirmed numerous times that it his birth certificate and it is a verifiable and court certified document. It is his legal birth certificate, if it wasn't, he'd have been charged with perjury by now (he is a Commonwealth civil servant and as such is legally empowered to witness official documents - lying about such a document would be a very serious offence that would not be ignored).
It seems to me entirely possible that in Feb. 1964, a Kenya Protectorate birth certification format distinct from the Kenya Colony format could have been modified with a new Republic of Kenya Coat of Arms.
You miss the point about the Coat of Arms. There are rules on how these things are used on official documents. The Coat of Arms of Kenya is not the Coat of Arms of the Coast Province. It would not be used on a Coast Province official document, anymore than the Australian Coat of Arms would not be used on a South Australian or Victorian document. Yes, they are located within those countries, but they are not entitled to bear those arms (in the original and classic sense of the term). You should not find the coat of arms of Kenya on a Coast Province document. If that was the only mistake, it'd still be significant - but on a document that also refers to the 'District of Mombassa' rather than 'Mombassa District' and which has a price given in units of currency that weren't used in Kenya, these single mistakes are adding up pretty quickly.
They haven't got the shield right. They haven't got the currency right. They haven't got the terminology right. How many mistakes do you need before you start to think there's something not quite right about a document?
Oh bother, another well hidden obamanoid sycophant wants to argue. Sorry, hold your own pecker and just spin along on your own. LOL
If anyone is a plant it is you sir!
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/
“Arlene Williams, who has a web site InvestigatingObama.blogspot.com and Phil from TheRightSideofLife were defaming me, claiming that I lied about Judge Carter’s order. Please, look at the order page 2 line 3. It states”… Court encourages the parties to begin discovery before the scheduling conference” (scheduling conference is on October the 5th).
why is judge Carter saying that- because I have to give Obama 30 days +3 days for mail and there is no reason to wait. On Sunday I submitted to the department of Justice electronically a proposed schedule of discovery. 33 days fall on October 17, I proposed deposition for October 19th Monday and left 4 weeks open, when I am available every day :weekdays and weekends, I will come to DC if need to be, to accommodate Obama and other defendants and witnesses.
“
“Now, going to saboteurs, wolfs in sheep’s clothe, Obots dressed as patriots. You have those sites of investigating Obama by Arlene Williams, therightsideoflife by Phil, people having their little internet blogtalkradio shows and going by names Chalice, Hannen, Evelyn Adams, and a few others. They present themselves as patriots, concentrate movement around themselves, but when there is one real threat to Obama regime, they slander and defame a person who does the real work. After a year of this struggle I am the only attorney with clients who have real standing, I am the only attorney who was able to reach actual court hearings. Until now all the cases were immediately summarily dismissed, so now all these pseudo patriots are attacking one person who is doing the real work and who has the real chance of removing Obama from Office and do it now.”
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/
At an estimate, between twenty and thirty.
Since both Kenya and Australia were part of the same Empire, wouldn't they have had similar basic forms?
No. The Australian colonies were self governing on domestic matters from the 1850s onwards. The Commonwealth of Australia was self governing on domestic matters from 1901. From 1942 onwards, the British government no longer had any power whatsoever to make laws concerning Australia, and things like Australia's laws on birth certificates are post that date.
Different parts of the former British Empire have quite different histories.
Non you have no honor from what I’ve seen the last several months.
I’m neither an Obamoid nor a sycophant. I’m only interested in trying to stop conservatives looking like gullible fools who believe anything that matches what they’d like to believe.
“I think Obama was born in Kenya. Wow! There’s a Kenyan birth certificate it must be real! Hey, now, there’s two Kenyan birth certificates, they must both be real!”
If he was born in Kenya, the Senate probably could have voted him to be a “natural born citizen” because his mother is an American citizen, in the same way they did for McCain who was born in Panama. The issue now is Obama’s honesty and whether he has committed fraud by trying to cover up the location of his birth. It looks like he may have made a major effort to cover up his true birthplace.
I'll just have to learn to live with your disapproval.
On a weekend, to blunt interest.
Over here!
A gut reaction is based on a deeper part of your self, one that isn’t conscious. No one is conscious in all of there behaviour, heck some are only barely conscious.
Both.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.