Posted on 09/08/2009 2:15:45 PM PDT by pissant
A California judge today tentatively scheduled a trial for Jan. 26, 2010, for a case that challenges Barack Obama's eligibility to be president based on questions over his qualifications under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.
If the case actually goes to arguments before U.S. District Judge David Carter, it will be the first time the merits of the dispute have been argued in open court, according to one of the attorneys working on the issue.
In a highly anticipated hearing today before Carter, several motions were heard, including a resolution to long-standing questions about whether attorney Orly Taitz properly served notice on the defendants, which she had.
In a second ruling, Carter ordered that attorney Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation can be added to the case to represent defendants Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson, who had been removed by an earlier court order. Drake, the vice presidential candidate for the American Independent Party, and Robinson, the party's chairman, were restored as plaintiffs.
But the judge did not immediately rule on Taitz' motion to be granted discovery – that is the right to see the president's still-concealed records. Nor did Carter rule immediately on a motion to dismiss the case, submitted by the U.S. government, following discussion over Taitz' challenge to the work of a magistrate in the case.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
I’m betting that you haven’t read the motion, either. Well, keep telling yourself that stuff and we’ll see what happens in October.
I did. How come u r not watching your Hero?
You know well what I'm talking about.
The Government asked Carter to dismiss the case on Friday,and he didn't do it. The government lawyers didn't say we will wait until October 5th. *snicker* They wanted him to summarily dismiss the case as soon as possible.
Judge Carter informed the court he didn't even read their motion to dismiss the case. Oh, is that a clear message to the government lawyers that he didn't even entertain their idea? Your da*n right; he didn't give it much more than a thought!
Why would he grant it without giving the other side a chance to respond? Are you sure you aren't clueless?
How about we put it to a FR vote who is more clueless you or me? I vote YOU. 1 to zip!
Because Taitz has been too inept to do it properly in the past 8 months.
And the Gooberment lawyers played games until Carter told them to except it not make silly excuses.
I saw this. I’ll believe it when I see it. They’ll try to do everything and anything to prevent this from coming out.
That being said, there is absolutely NO information on Obama. What did he do in his past? Where did he live? What is his right SSN? How can a person talk about the historical makeup of the President without a history? You can only hold back the waters for so long before the dam starts to burst. I think people are starting to see they have a ringer. I wonder how many Democrats will say, “Wow, we just never realized...”
I can't say that I see a resemblance in your photo. However, I really like this view of Obama Jr. and Malcolm X:
Unfortunately, the "Look-A-Like Meter" can't really distinguish between any of the possible fathers, though it does tilt in favor of FMD ;-)
I think he looks like Malcolm X.
The son of Davis looks part Hawaiian to me.
You know, I thought the color was off a little bit but, after some 'shopping, I do believe I'm starting to see the resemblance :-)
Btw, how come those weather underground people didn’t go to jail..except for a couple that got pardoned by Clinton.
Obama tans. Remember the beach photo? Remember when they attacked Palin for having a tanning bed? Alinsky’s rules, project/attack on your weaknesses...
Among many other things...like planning to blow up Fort Dix and Columbia University..only the bombs exploded in their safe house...etc.
INteresting... wasn’t one of them a fellow Bill AYers? Is he the one who wrote Obama’s book about finding a birth certificate?
Maybe Bill Ayers can help out Judge Carter by telling us where the old birth cert is...
And Jeff Jones...involved with Van Jones’ Apollo group.
Basically the answer to all of those is yes. It’s harder to get away with today, but it was rather easy for the most all of the 20th century as long as you were using a number you knew wasn’t being used by anyone else (ie, a dead person’s number). Using such numbers and other identity documents with different or slightly different names enable multiple identities for all such shenanigans.
I missed the tanning bed attack - wacky. Your post did remind me, though, that I seem to recall the Dems claiming that it was time to "stop the politics of personal destruction" during Clinton's terms (I think...) Of course, that's a one-way street with them, since Alinksy has clearly been on their mind all during GWB's time in office.
As my political science professor described them (Dr. Christina Jeffrey, a victim of Alinsky-style attacks, herself), we have the "Evil Party" and the "Stupid Party". I might replace "stupid" with "spineless", but I'm sure you have an idea of which is which.
I had not previously looked at the appellee’s brief and just have and do not see the signature. But it was on the statements of issues presented and other preliminary filings filed by the appelees, which I had looked at previously.
Only if Kay refuses to cook.
Tell her I’ll bring the ham. He hasn’t been out in awhile. The economy has him down.
I agree. You are a lot better than Obama...so your opinion is not alone anymore as NS says. :-)
What would you say if a Kos kid who tied to present this in 2001:
We already KNOW that Bush stole the election. We don’t need a court to tell us. We need the court to legitimize removing this guy from office. It is not about “THE LAW” It is about a Fascist, Christian, Republican, Usurper occupying the office of president that he has no right to occupy. Just as a jury finding a defendant “not guilty” does not mean he is INNOCENT. We KNOW Bush is guilty. We can read, we can hear, we can see, we can THINK. The “law” is a means to an end not the be all end all “end” in itself. That is why despite all the dismissed & ignored law suits, we will NEVER give up until he is removed, because WE ARE RIGHT. THIS WILL NOT STAND. It WILL be resolved by ANY means necessary. Yes, ANY means. If this fraud is allowed to stand by the courts, I fear someone WILL take matters into their own hands. Passions are that high. It happened before in our country in 1776. The citizens had been pushed to the breaking point and armed conflict erupted. It CAN happen again. Maybe it should. What is happening now IS tyranny.
He is exposing CIA members to them right now!!!
She is in very deep dooodo herself!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.