You know well what I'm talking about.
The Government asked Carter to dismiss the case on Friday,and he didn't do it. The government lawyers didn't say we will wait until October 5th. *snicker* They wanted him to summarily dismiss the case as soon as possible.
Judge Carter informed the court he didn't even read their motion to dismiss the case. Oh, is that a clear message to the government lawyers that he didn't even entertain their idea? Your da*n right; he didn't give it much more than a thought!
Why would he grant it without giving the other side a chance to respond? Are you sure you aren't clueless?
How about we put it to a FR vote who is more clueless you or me? I vote YOU. 1 to zip!
Because Taitz has been too inept to do it properly in the past 8 months.
And the Gooberment lawyers played games until Carter told them to except it not make silly excuses.
You truly are clueless about the process. The opposing side has the right to respond to a motion to dismiss. The government had no expectation that their motion would be granted on Tuesday. And I'll also point out that the judge could have denied their motion on Tuesday, as he did with all three of Orly's, but he didn't do that either. If your quote is accurate and the judge said such motions seldom if ever are granted then why didn't he do that? If he was so contemptuous that he hadn't bothered to read it, as you seem to believe, why didn't he toss it along with Orly's frivolous motions? Especially if, as you believe, he wasn't going to give it any thought anyway?
How about we put it to a FR vote who is more clueless you or me? I vote YOU. 1 to zip!
(*yawn*) And I vote you. Tied.
And the Gooberment lawyers played games until Carter told them to except it not make silly excuses.
You haven't read any of the transcripts or the orders that have been printed or issued in this case, have you? Why not, they're all available out there? Instead you post from total ignorance, which is no doubt the state you feel most comfortable in. You really are clueless.