Posted on 09/07/2009 8:25:54 PM PDT by RobinMasters
The U.S. Justice Department is urging a federal judge in California to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama to hold the office of president.
The highly anticipated hearing tomorrow morning before Judge David Carter features attorney Orly Taitz and numerous plaintiffs, as well as a document that one person has sworn is the original birth certificate of Obama from Kenya – not Hawaii, where the administration maintains Obama was born.
In a motion filed Friday in Santa Ana, Calif., attorneys for the government did not directly address the merits of Taitz's claims, but instead focused their efforts on technical procedures, suggesting the matter can't be decided in court and that the dozens of plaintiffs cannot demonstrate they have been injured by having Obama in the Oval Office.
"It is clear, from the text of the Constitution, and the relevant statutory law implementing the Constitution's textual commitments, that challenges to the qualifications of a candidate for president can, in the first instance, be presented to the voting public before the election, and, once the election is over, can be raised as objections as the electoral votes are counted in the Congress," wrote Assistant U.S. Attorneys Roger West and David DeJute. "Therefore, challenges such as those purportedly raised in this case are committed, under the Constitution, to the electors, and to the Legislative branch."
Is this the footprint of baby Barack Obama?
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Why are DOJ lawyers involved? Why isn’t Obama paying his own lawyers to fight this? So now the DOJ feels they can walk in and tell a judge what to do?
This week could be very interesting
yep. Time for popcorn, pizza and candy.
Can holder do that?
Since when can the DOJ urge a judge to do anything?
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.
Obama Says A Baby Is A Punishment
Obama: “If they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”
The DOJ doesn’t think the laws apply to them!
Um, the argument for this would be the troops dying because of his orders.
So, yes people are nut just hurt, they're dying because of his orders
to return fire only policy.
“Is this the footprint of baby Barack Obama? “
Well, it;s black....
I have noticed. It is an agency totally out of control. When you have long-time employees telling Holder and company not to dismiss charges against the new Black Panthers in Philly, and they do anyway, it speaks volumes that Holder will do what he wants. Holder doesn’t care about the Rule of Law at all.
Wonder how many laws Holder has broken?
The Value of Footprinting
Print experts agree that every individual’s prints contain friction ridge minutiae, i.e., ridge detail, that are unique to that person. Even the footprints and fingerprints of identical twins are different. Furthermore, friction ridge minutiae remain naturally unchanged throughout a person’s life. Because of this consistency, FBI print experts have identified the adult victims of such disasters as fires and airplane crashes by using the footprints of the individuals taken in infancy.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2194/is_n11_v63/ai_16473798/
For Liberals, EVERYTHING can be decided in court!
Oh, someones water has broken...they're very, very, scared!
It’s amazing the DOJ even knows anything about this suit.
They clearly have been following it and are worried.
The DOJ can KMA!
Have no faith it is real, but the action might force him to produce evidence of his real birth place.
But by the way he has resisted this, he probably cannot.
marked
DOJ?
Someone’s worried.
Apparently Holder has time on his hands to fight this case since he dismissed the New Black Panther Party matter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.