Posted on 08/31/2009 5:49:36 PM PDT by Kaslin
1st Amendment: Mark Lloyd, a disciple of Saul Alinsky and fan of Hugo Chavez, wants to destroy talk radio and says free speech is a distraction. The new FCC diversity "czar" says Venezuela is an example we should follow.
They share a common hero Saul Alinsky who wrote the community organizer's bible, "Rules for Radicals." It speaks of confrontation or, as candidate Obama put it, of "getting in their faces" as a way to obtain power, not from the people or for the people, but over the people.
Lloyd has written that we make too much of the constitutionally guaranteed freedoms of speech and the press for "the purpose of free speech is warped to protect global corporations and block rules that would promote democratic governance."
We thought we were democratically governed. We thought we could vote as we choose after a vigorous and open debate. Once the major networks served as information gatekeepers controlling what we saw and heard. Now talk radio, the Internet and cable news have enhanced democracy by promoting the free flow of information and discourse. Lloyd wants to stop all that.
(Excerpt) Read more at ibdeditorials.com ...
Not if Martin Luther King, Jr. had any thing to do with it.
It’s a strawman argument, create an enemy out of thin air.
A. CALL YOU REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMAN OR CONGRESSWOMAN.
B. ASK THEM POINTEDLY, "WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT THIS (HIM)?!"
C. TAKE DOWN THEIR OR THEIR AIDE'S SPECIFIC RESPONSE.
D. POST THEIR REPLY VERY PUBLICLY HERE ON FR, WITH THE NAME OF THE CONGRESSMAN, STATE, CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT NUMBER, ETC.
Our ONLY hope on this is to put pressure on the G.O.P. and expose them if they drag their feet and threat them TOO, for 2010.
But it will take many, many of us, as well as some TV and talk radio, and then a solid core of GOP on The Hill.
Then write to all the editors of newspapers AND DEMAND TO KNOW WHY THEY ARE NOT INVESTIGATING, RESEARCHING AND WRITING ABOUT THIS INFILTRATION OF COMMUNISTS INTO THE GOVT. DEMAND TO KNOW WHY THEY REFUSE TO DO THEIR JOB, TO BE RESPONSIBLE TO THE PEOPLE OF THE USA BY PROBING, BY REPORTING THESE UN-AMERICAN ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE GOVT, THE DENIALS OF OUR FREEDOMS,I.E.THE INTERNET, CONSERVATIVE TALK SHOWS ON RADIO/TV, OUR FREEDOM OF SPEECH! WRITE TO REPUBLICAN POLITICIANS AND DEMAND THEY THEY DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS INFILITRATION OF COMMUNISTS IN GOVT...TELL THEM THEY MUST SPEAK UP NOW AND INFORM THE PUBLIC AS TO WHAT IS HAPPENING..DO IT IN PRINT FORM,OR IN A FACT SHEET AND HAND IT OUT ON A DISTRICT TO DISTRICT, STATE BY STATE BASIS...WHATEVER MEANS POSSIBLE! BUT, DO SOMETIHNG!
Does anyone else have any ideas on whom to contact...Republicans,Democrats,independents?
McConnell v. FCC 2003.
What you have here is Eric Holder, Rahm Emanuel, Ezekial Emanuel, Jones and others serving as Obama's politboro!
McCain is mentally incompetent. How would he know anything about Obama.
Hey did you get your permit for that comment?
Now, now. You don't understand.
He just wants to put his gloved hands around your throat. Nothing hostile in that, it'll be okay. He promises.
</sarc>
You know, it's sad. Guys like McCain and Admiral Stockdale and Col. Stratton and others suffered brutally at the hands of peons who were being run by thugs like Obama and his Chicago pals.
In fact, part of the sniggering the young trendy-Lefties engaged in at McCain last year was keyed by McCain's stiff body-language and walk. The man had been literally crippled by people like them, who followed people like Obama.
You would think a guy like McCain would be able to smell someone like Obama from half a mile upwind, and that he'd point the finger and call dozens with all the immense moral authority he possesses to call down on people like that.
That he did not do that, is (IMHO) largely the fault of the Republican Establishment and their "rules" for being one of the fellows. No unpleasantness! No calling a spade a spade! No pointy fingers! (Not even at honest-to-Christ Communists and Nazis?)
The Obama admin appointed Kevin Jennings, founder of the pro-homosexual GLSEN organization, "to oversee the nation's safe schools" program. Jennings was involved in the 2000 "Fistgate" scandal in which homosexual adults at a GLSEN youth workshop "guided young teens on how to engage in sexual perversions, including the violent gay practice known as "fisting," (Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com .........
SOURCE 6-6-09 | World net Daily | FR Posted by simonsaid
A coalition of Christian organizations has launched an effort to have him removed, asserting that Kevin Jennings is one of the most vitriolic anti-Christian activists in America. Jennings is known for his prolific use of obscenities to describe Christians. Jenning will apparently advance Barack Obama's anti-Christian homosexual agenda.
The shocking Jennings appointment is another flagrant example of Obama saying one thing and doing another---and flaunting it, as well. Candidate Obama catered to Black Churchgoers who voted for him thinking he would uphold their strong anti-homosexual views.
Obama ran on a platform against same sex marriage and has given the impression he will do nothing to advance same sex marriage as president. This calculated move serves to make Black Churchgoers complacent while giving Obama leeway to advance the homosexualist agenda in other ways.
ACTION RESPONSE America needs to very vigilant: Obama and his loathsome COS staff Rahm Emanuel are very calculated in their use of power----and are capable of staging events to boost their advantage even as dissent among the populace grows
If these two arch-manipulators perceive there isnt measurable fear in the hearts of the people, they will create that fear to solidify their power. They know people will succumb to fear and will relinquish their God-given liberties when they are fearful.
hey dont want or need to...for whatever reason, they have chosen NOW to mash the pedal to the metal and go for broke...
its 'game on' whether we are ready or not...
So what’s the job description of a Diversity Czar anyway? To somehow sit in moral judgement to divide us further? Isn’t diversity in this case ‘division’?
Wouldn’t diversity accept all opposing viewpoints? By basic definition, would it justify racism? Is civil war ‘diverse’ enough for ya?
Apparently what 0 really needs now is a Semantics Czar. Extreme liberal thinking complicates everything and solves nothing.
A czar is an anointed Christian monarch. A commissar is the strong arm of the political party in power.
>>A czar is an anointed Christian monarch.
Czar / Kaiser are derivatives of the word “Caesar”. Left over from Emperor Constantine’s syncretist/pagan un-Holy Roman Empire.
Nothing Christian about it.
>>Apparently what 0 really needs now is a Semantics Czar
O-Newspeak Dictionary, 2009 edition.
Coming soon to a Ministry of Information outlet near you...
Stockholm Syndrome.
Your statement that Constantine was unChristian is protestant revisionism. No Christian ever said that about the emperor until centuries after Luther. Even Luther did not hold the view you espoused. Constantine also did not rule of the Holy Roman Empire - a middle ages Germanic construct. He ruled from Constantinople and not Rome or the Vatican.
>>Constantine’s was God’s anointed ruler on earth.
Oh (papal) BULL.
Is it Easter/Ishtar/Isis/Oster day yet, Mary? Is it solstice yet?
What day of the Roman/Catholic week is it?
Sun-day.
Moon-day.
Tyr(Mars)-day.
Woden-day.
Thors-day.
Frig(Venus)-day.
Saturn-day.
Nah, nothing to see there, move along.
Constantine’s product was syncretist, opportunistic, convenient... - and it perverted true Christian faith for the exploitation/preservation of the Empire.
Czar = Kaiser = CAESAR.
NO SALE.
I don’t need any Indulgences or “pergatory” Candles today, thank you very little.
My debt was paid on Calvary, and I don’t need the intervention of the hierarchy/hive; so buzz off, Bity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.