Posted on 08/08/2009 9:20:49 PM PDT by MindBender26
Edited on 08/08/2009 9:33:42 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Jerone Corsi, Ph. D. is about to drop another bombshell, casting further doubt on the stories of President Obama's birth.
Dr. Corsi, whose doctorate is from Harvard, is an excellent researcher and investigative journalist. He was the driving force behind the Swift Boat veterans telling the truth about War Phony John Kerry. He is also the author of "Obamanation."
In his latest research, to be splashed on WND early next week, Dr. Corsi will reveal that he has documentary evidence that the mother of Barack Obama Jr., Ms Stanley A. Durham-Soetoro, began evening classes at the University of Washington in Seattle on August 19, 1961. This is just 15 days after she supposedly gave birth to President Obama in Hawaii.
We are expected to believe that in just15 days, she gave birth, stayed in the hospital for a few days, them packed her things and left her house in Hawaii, moved to Seattle, got established there, registered for, then began classed in Seattle, all the while caring for her newborn.
The new evidence also destroys another Obama legend-lie. According to the Presidents autobiography, Obama Sr. and Durhan-Soetoro were supposedly deeply in love and made a happy home together in Hawaii, complete with their baby, until Obama Sr. had to move to Boston to attend Harvard and could not afford take Stanley and baby Barack with him.
According to Dr. Corsis new written evidence, Durham-Soetoro was in college classes, thousands of miles away from Hawaii and did not return to the islands until long Obama Sr. left for Harvard.
Dr. Corsi also reveals that a Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth requires no proof of any kind and could simply be issued on the sworn statement of one parent.
All of this simply adds to the fast growing uncertainty and suspicion over Obamas supposed birth stories. Is August 4, 1961, his real birth date? Where was he really born? When he traveled to the Middle East in the 1990s, he did not have a US passport. What country issued him a passport, and why? Why wont he release the one document that would answer all the questions?
It just gets deeper and deeper.
It seems that Congress and SCOTUS do not mind having a potential foreigner in the WH. These are strange and mysterious times.
The transcript in post 114 looks authentic. I have a similar one somewhere. In the lower right corner it shows the courses she took from 9/19/61 to 12/11 and 12/12 61. There were no semesters at the University of Washington.
Assuming you are correct, the (hypothetical) situation would provide Biden with a stigma: Biden was nominated by a man not qualified to nominate him.
“Simply put, zer0 refuses to comply with the U.S. Constitution...”
.
He can do so because no one in Congress has the brass to force the issue.
Bates:
What are you talking about. The article deals with 1961 and I don’t see where 1962 is mentioned
Under the law, Biden was nominated by the duly qualified Democratic National Convention, as recommended by Obama.
Where do you see August 19, 1962. in the article?
I have remembered it since last year but it seems like most folks around here don't. This whole story line went on for months and it was the left pushing it.
Anyway, I dug this back up in response to a question in this thread. I think the world needs reminding of just how good a job the Press can do when they aren't hiding their heads in the sand.
Check out Post 120 in this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2311748/posts?page=120#120
totally agree with your post. WTH? I started class in 1981 in September like most colleges require
Congress also passes a resolution making everything Biden signs retroactive.
NO, we don't need a Constitutional Crisis of that magnitude.
Just challenge Obama’s honesty and destroy the Obama myth.
Read it again, I think YOU got it wrong.
“In his latest research, to be splashed on WND early next week, Dr. Corsi will reveal that he has documentary evidence that the mother of Barack Obama Jr., Ms Stanley A. Durham-Soetoro, began evening classes at the University of Washington in Seattle on August 19, 1961. This is just 15 days after she supposedly gave birth to President Obama in Hawaii.”
Yes, and other Oprah endorsed authors, who committed historical frauds, were taken down in disgrace.
This post sucks. ZOT it and make the poster start from scratch. reading through the posts it gets confusing between original and ammended.
Skip that.
Make the post original and pristine.
I vote ZOT anyone else?
Religion is not listed on the 1961 Hawaiian long form birth certificate. Here's one from one of the Nordyke twins (the older one) born the very next day after "whatever his name is", if one believes the COLB forgery's information.
and here's one from 1963 that is somewhat easier to read, but one can see the format is the same as the '61.
Incidentally the serial number of the younger of the Nordyke twins, 10638, is still 3 numbers less that BHO Jr.'s, even though he was supposedly born almost a full day earlier, in the same hospital (this week anyway) and the online COLB also indicates his BC was filed 3 days before those of the Nordyke twins, Aug. 8 verse Aug 11. . Something to make you go "hmmm".
There is ALSO a political process.
This HURTS Obama, it keeps him off message, or at least it keeps the MSM and the Obamabots off message.
This hurts his “mandate”.
This weakens his ability to lead.
This is VERY important even if we don't remove Obama from office before the end of his 4 year term.
“In his latest research, to be splashed on WND early next week, Dr. Corsi will reveal that he has documentary evidence that the mother of Barack Obama Jr., Ms Stanley A. Durham-Soetoro, began evening classes at the University of Washington in Seattle on August 19, 1961. This is just 15 days after she supposedly gave birth to President Obama in Hawaii. “
true, it was not Soeteoro (SP?) until AFTER she got married to that guy.
Thanks for your advice.
Not true. Under the law as it existed in 1961, if Stanley Ann was married to BHO Sr, and if BHO Jr. was not born in the US, then BHO Jr. was not a US Citizen at birth. The could have been naturalized later of course, but then he would not then be "natural born" by anyone's definition.
However if Stanley and and BHO Sr were not married, and BHO Jr was born overseas, or of course in the US, then BHO was a citizen at birth. If born in the US and BHO Sr. acknowledged paternity, as by being married to the mother, or otherwise, then BHO Jr is not "Natural born", because one of his parents was not a Citizen at the time of his birth. Only if someone else is the acknowledged sperm donor might BHO Jr have been natural born. That is having two US citizen parents and being born on territory under US sovereignty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.