Skip to comments.
Obama Birth Story Unraveling - Mother In Univ Class In Seattle 15 Days After Obama Supposedly Born!
Dr. Jerome Corsi / Rusty Humphries Show
Posted on 08/08/2009 9:20:49 PM PDT by MindBender26
Edited on 08/08/2009 9:33:42 PM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 421-429 next last
One more things to remember; if Obama is not a natural-born citizen, then he is not a US citizen if any kind, since he has never gone through a naturalization process!
To: MindBender26
RESIGN OBABA. The jig is up!
2
posted on
08/08/2009 9:21:36 PM PDT
by
April Lexington
(Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
To: MindBender26
Well, you could just do a core sample of his leg and count the rings ... no wait, that’s for telling how old Gore is.
3
posted on
08/08/2009 9:23:43 PM PDT
by
coloradan
(The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
To: WeatherGuy; CBF; x_plus_one; Libertina; sportutegrl; kayti; narses; Avid Coug; RedinaBlue; ...
Say WA? Evergreen State ping
Quick link:
WA State Board
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this ping list.
Ping sionnsar if you see a Washington state related thread.
4
posted on
08/08/2009 9:23:57 PM PDT
by
sionnsar
(IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Neda Agha-Soltan - victim of murdering regime)
To: MindBender26
This would mean EVERY action as president would be illegal. All the money lent out would have to be considered a gift as it was loaned under false pretenses, his SCOTUS appointment would be nullified and any bill he signed would have to be reconsidered.
5
posted on
08/08/2009 9:24:43 PM PDT
by
LukeL
(Yasser Arafat: "I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize")
To: MindBender26
The powers of the Federal government must be severely restricted by the states. Return all political power to the states. Strip all executive and legislative power from the federal government and have a Congress of our elected state governors serve as a legislature that directs the federal administration in its ministerial duties. Or,... kiss our collective freedoms goodbye!
6
posted on
08/08/2009 9:24:46 PM PDT
by
April Lexington
(Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
To: MindBender26
More and more interesting...
7
posted on
08/08/2009 9:24:50 PM PDT
by
BigCinBigD
('Evil white devil since 1960')
To: MindBender26
“began evening classes at the University of Washington in Seattle on August 19, 1962. This is just 15 days after she supposedly gave birth to President Obama in Hawaii.”
What? Obama was born in 1961 not 1962.
To: MindBender26
Wasn’t her name Stanley Ann, not Sydney? They need to be careful about errors like that because the libs will jump all over the error and use it to discredit the whole story.
To: MindBender26
August 19, 1962. This is just 15 days after she supposedly gave birth to President Obama. . . . Uh, no. He was supposedly born on August 4, 1961.
To be off by a whole year certainly damages the credibility of this story.
To: April Lexington
Expect massive howling by the MSM when this breaks. “Those kooks are at it again...”
11
posted on
08/08/2009 9:25:42 PM PDT
by
April Lexington
(Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
To: MindBender26
Thanks for posting. Very interesting. Barry could be the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on “free people”.
12
posted on
08/08/2009 9:25:44 PM PDT
by
PGalt
To: MindBender26
Ms Sydney A. Durham-Soetoro
I thought her name was Stanley Ann?
To: MindBender26
It is still possible that the couple was estranged by the time the baby was born and she had been making plans to split asap after the birth. But the love story thing is obviously an Onama fiction.
14
posted on
08/08/2009 9:26:10 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
(ECCE HOMO!)
To: MindBender26
What a waste of time. Obama will NEVER be removed due to any issues with his birth certificate.
15
posted on
08/08/2009 9:26:36 PM PDT
by
CatOwner
To: MindBender26
My FUBAR - All dates 1961, not 1962. My typo
16
posted on
08/08/2009 9:26:54 PM PDT
by
MindBender26
(Never Kick Leftists When They Are Down. Let Them Halfway Back Up. You Get Much Better Leverage!)
To: Montanabound
Wasnt her name Stanley Ann, not Sydney? They need to be careful about errors like that because the libs will jump all over the error and use it to discredit the whole story.Exactly what I thought.
17
posted on
08/08/2009 9:26:59 PM PDT
by
buccaneer81
(Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century. I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
To: BigCinBigD
Not really. First this author got the year wrong. Second are we supposed to believe that in 15 days Miss Dunham instead traveled several thousand more miles from Africa to Seattle and that makes it plausible?
To: Charles Henrickson
Uh, no. He was supposedly born on August 4, 1961. To be off by a whole year certainly damages the credibility of this story. Excellent point. Corsi is not a great source lately.
19
posted on
08/08/2009 9:28:07 PM PDT
by
buccaneer81
(Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century. I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
To: Montanabound
It’s rife with mistakes. I’d say the credibility is already damaged, and in just minutes too.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 421-429 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson