Posted on 08/08/2009 9:20:49 PM PDT by MindBender26
Edited on 08/08/2009 9:33:42 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
The issue is that Stanley Ann's transcript, both in the "filled in by typing" and computer printed versions, say that she started on in late September, but rather August 19th. It could be that both are in error, but this seems unlikely. The date was typed twice on that record, and both of the dates are definitely "8-19-61" while the computer version says 08-19-61, also twice, and the image of that is quite clear.
IF that date is correct, that gave her 15 days. An anecdotal report from one of her friends puts her in the area not latter than late August, with Barry in tow, and AFAIK, that anecdote was reported well before the transcripts surfaced.
.
Yes - I believe he purposely used the first name Barak at one or more times for his own reasons - as well as various last names as aliases
When at Harvard in Boston he ran up hundreds of parking tickets he managed to ignore until he was caught in 2008(?) during the campaign
I believe he has several criminal arrests under variety of his known and unknown aliases
I believe he not only received / bought cocaine in NYC, Boston, and Chicago - I believe he did more than give a little cocaine to his alleged friends - You do not buy unlimited free 6-packs for people - you expect to be paid for gas, time, trouble, aggravation
I believe he was tight with drug dealers and has been areested under one of his known or unknown aliases and simply skipped out on a court date and was never tracked down and rearrested, triied, convicted, sentenced, imprisoned
He sure was tight with Bomber Ayers - an admitted bomber and admitted rapist -
Then the transcript is likely a fake. The UW Autumn quarter does not start that early, and the Summer quarter ends right around the third week of August.
It’s irrelevant when she began classes. We know she was there with Barry when he was a week or so old. Unless her friend lied.
this is NOT A WASTE OF TIme!
Those critics that are so upset with the “birthers” miss the whole point..nothing will remove him from office, whether he was a legitimate born citizen or not. the endless Birther reports, investigations and media ridicule are VERY IMPORTANT in their own right.
The birthers constantly bring up doubt about ALL of Obama’s past...was he influenced by Muslims, how close to Ayers was he, what were his and his family’s leftist/commie leanings; how involved was he with his doping days, Why won’t he let us see his transcripts, etc? this adds fuel to the fire that Obama is at best, incompetent, at worst a commie with a nefarious, dishonest agenda.
Even IF he is legitimately born in Hawaii...WHAT ELSE IS GOING ON in his past he doesn’t want released?
And if none of the investigations reveal anything...so WHAT?
The constant Drip, Drip Drip fosters “Doubt’ in the citizens about HIM.
GO BIRTHERS!!!!
ha! and everytime Oreilly and Beck and Boortz ridcule the Birthers....HA! They are bringing up the doubt again!!
GO BIRTHERS!
Find where her friend said he was only a week old.
Her friend said Stanley didn’t know how to change diapers and asked her to do it.
Maybe Stanley wanted a little break. Did the friend say it was a newborn baby?
Find it yourself and read what I wrote again. I did NOT say ONE week. A week or so... could be a little more but mommy didn’t know how to change a diaper yet, and where was dad?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.