Skip to comments.
Chuck Norris: I agree with Dobbs
Politico ^
| 8-4-09
| Michael Calderone
Posted on 08/04/2009 10:44:23 PM PDT by STARWISE
Lou Dobbs, and his network, have been receiving a lot of criticism lately for the host's promotion of a debunked conspiracy theory.
But Dobbs has a new ally:
actor and former Mike Huckabee supporter Chuck Norris.
Norris writes: "I agree with CNN's Lou Dobbs, who was chastised by his own media outlet for demanding the release of your original birth certificate."
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: allahpundit; article2section1; barackobama; bho44; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; charlesjohnson; chucknorris; colb; constitution; hillary; hotair; lgf; loudobbs; naturalborn; obamanoncitizenissue; pumas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: GBA
I remember about a week or so ago tingly leg Hardball Chris showed it and told everybody to basically shut up.
21
posted on
08/05/2009 6:03:50 AM PDT
by
AirForceMom
(Locked and loaded, and sharpening wooden stakes.)
To: STARWISE
Notice the opening line of this wuckphit Calderone's 'article':
"Lou Dobbs, and his network, have been receiving a lot of criticism lately for the host's promotion of a debunked conspiracy theory."
Hey Mikey, it ain't been debunked, only in the minds of the 0bamunist KoolAid drinkers like you.
And God Bless Chuck Norris *and* Lou Dobbs!
22
posted on
08/05/2009 6:37:37 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(Hey Comrade 0bama? No documentation = No eligibility, ok? Now GTF out of OUR White House, got it?)
To: mkjessup
Why Obama has to ram through all the deadly legislation in just a few weeks:
Why are these off limits?
1. Certified copy of original birth certificate
2. Columbia University transcripts
3. Columbia thesis paper
4. Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups
5. Harvard University transcripts
6. Illinois State Senate records
7. Illinois State Senate schedule
8. Law practice client list and billing records/summary
9. Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mothers
10. Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)
11. Occidental College Transcripts
12. Parent’s marriage Certificate
13. Record of baptism
14. Selective Service registration records
15. Schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007
16. Scholarly articles
17. Access to his grandmother (Obama’s grandmother has since passed away from cancer)
18. List of all campaign workers that are lobbyists
19. Punahou grade school records
23
posted on
08/05/2009 6:48:15 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
To: stephenjohnbanker
Those are all valid questions my FRiend, and I cannot help but believe that if we had been talking about George W. Bush instead of Comrade 0bama, the Ministry of Information (aka the lamestream media) would have kept up a drumbeat of outrage and indignation 24/7 until the 43rd President coughed up the records, and provided absolute transparency.
The fact is, NONE of 0bama's predecessors went to such lengths to conceal the details of the items you have thoughtfully provided, which begs the question WHY?!? I'll tell you why:
Barack Hussein 0bama is NOT Constitutionally eligible to hold the Office of President, he is illegally occupying that Office, and each and every individual who has assisted him and provided support for this criminal conspiracy is guilty of the same thing 0bama is:
TREASON
24
posted on
08/05/2009 8:41:16 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(Hey Comrade 0bama? No documentation = No eligibility, ok? Now GTF out of OUR White House, got it?)
To: mkjessup
I wholeheartedly agree. Now let’s nail him!
25
posted on
08/05/2009 8:48:33 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
To: STARWISE
26
posted on
08/05/2009 9:27:16 AM PDT
by
Dryman
(Now, Back to Lurking)
To: stephenjohnbanker
Supposedly, as POTUS, his history is our history to study and learn from. It should be available for all to see.
I think the demonrats' reaction to a proposed bill to require all Presidential candidates for the 2012 election and beyond to prove their NB citizenship as required by the Constitution is curious.
By fighting against what would seem to be such a minor and common sense bill designed to satisfy a Constitutional requirement, are they tacitly admitting that obama wouldn't be able to meet that requirement should he seek re-election? Why else would they oppose it?
27
posted on
08/05/2009 10:13:37 AM PDT
by
GBA
To: GBA
“By fighting against what would seem to be such a minor and common sense bill designed to satisfy a Constitutional requirement, are they tacitly admitting that obama wouldn’t be able to meet that requirement should he seek re-election? Why else would they oppose it? “
No other reason. Good point!
28
posted on
08/05/2009 10:23:03 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
To: STARWISE
FREE the vital records, Hawaii!
To: fr_freak
Actually, I like that Chuck is taking this approach. This way, he focuses on the "transparency" issue while staying untouched by the controversial "not natural-born" issue. He chips away from the East, we chip away from the West. Good point, but I still would like for him to know that there is more to it than just that.
30
posted on
08/05/2009 6:42:41 PM PDT
by
Bellflower
(The end of this age is near but the beginning of the next glorious one is coming!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson