[stephenjohnbanker]

Why Obama has to ram through all the deadly legislation in just a few weeks:

Why are these off limits?
1. Certified copy of original birth certificate
2. Columbia University transcripts
3. Columbia thesis paper
4. Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups
5. Harvard University transcripts
6. Illinois State Senate records
7. Illinois State Senate schedule
8. Law practice client list and billing records/summary
9. Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mothers
10. Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)
11. Occidental College Transcripts
12. Parent’s marriage Certificate
13. Record of baptism
14. Selective Service registration records
15. Schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007
16. Scholarly articles
17. Access to his grandmother (Obama’s grandmother has since passed away from cancer)
18. List of all campaign workers that are lobbyists
19. Punahou grade school records

[mkjessup]

Those are all valid questions my FRiend, and I cannot help but believe that if we had been talking about George W. Bush instead of Comrade 0bama, the Ministry of Information (aka the lamestream media) would have kept up a drumbeat of outrage and indignation 24/7 until the 43rd President coughed up the records, and provided absolute transparency.

The fact is, NONE of 0bama's predecessors went to such lengths to conceal the details of the items you have thoughtfully provided, which begs the question WHY?!? I'll tell you why:

Barack Hussein 0bama is NOT Constitutionally eligible to hold the Office of President, he is illegally occupying that Office, and each and every individual who has assisted him and provided support for this criminal conspiracy is guilty of the same thing 0bama is:

TREASON

[GBA]

Supposedly, as POTUS, his history is our history to study and learn from. It should be available for all to see.

I think the demonrats' reaction to a proposed bill to require all Presidential candidates for the 2012 election and beyond to prove their NB citizenship as required by the Constitution is curious.

By fighting against what would seem to be such a minor and common sense bill designed to satisfy a Constitutional requirement, are they tacitly admitting that obama wouldn't be able to meet that requirement should he seek re-election? Why else would they oppose it?