Posted on 08/04/2009 7:33:27 PM PDT by pissant
A document unveiled by a California attorney in her quest to determine President Obama's place of birth has been condemned as a forgery by critics who deride as nonsense the challenges that have been raised to the president based on the U.S. Constitution's demand that the Oval Office occupant be a "natural born" citizen.
But those on the other side, who would like to see the original documentation of Obama's birth place revealed, say there are factors that indicate the Kenyan birth document could be real.
WND reported when the document was submitted to a California court by California attorney Orly Taitz, who has managed several of the high-profile cases challenging Obama's eligibility to be president.
Then yesterday, Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., raised the dispute to the floor of that august body, protesting in a speech added to the Congressional Record that the dispute was not worth one minute of time.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Of course the Bomford doc. being fake does not mean that the Kenya doc is real, it just means the DUmies have been pulling a fast one.
bookmarked/Sir Edward F. Lavender Source(s): Kenya Dominion Record 4667 Australian library
thanks. There seems to be a lot of Lavenders running around the former british empire. I guess its better than being named Pansy
Brisbane is in Queensland.
Good find.
Bomford changed the First initial of Lavender and Miller (that is, if the Kenyan Lavender holds up)
Weird stuff. Thanks for that info
On the Bomford B.C. it was G.F. Lavender.
Explain please for us ignorant folk. Pictures work well for me.
Plenty of newspaper blurbs discounts your assumption.
This one below is not from "NEVADA PALLADIUM TIMES."
-----------------------------------------
To: Red Steel
Keep in mind this was published in April of 1961 from a Missouri newspaper. Apparently the usage of the "Republic of Kenya" was not uncommon.
That is the purpose of this post. Please discuss.
From TexasDarlins blog:
on August 3, 2009 at 7:31 pm | Reply lev8mysoul I asked a british history buff I know if he could find out who the colonial registrar was for Mombasa in 1961. He called me up a few minutes ago and said Sir Edward F. Lavender Source(s): Kenya Dominion Record 4667 Australian library
Interestingly also a Yahoo question by the same person(?)
Africa & Middle East > Kenya > Resolved Question Lev8myso... Member since: October 28, 2007 Total points: 9979 (Level 5) Add to My Contacts Block User Resolved QuestionShow me another » Who was British colonial registrar in Mombasa Kenya in 1961? I'm trying to find out the name of the registrar in Mombasa in 1961, who would have registered the births, marriages, etc. at that time.
Look at the FIRST line of the Bomford one. A mark from a photo editor from LEAD TECHNOLOGIES:
There was a post that said Bamford and Bomford are different folks.
See #128...for example.
Ignore previous post. Good work. I don’t think there’s any doubt now that the Bromford is a fake. That big fat turkey DUmmie thought he would get away with that. Neener neener.
I’m now on a more level coaster. How about you? The 3rd was just nutty. We had so much coming at us all at once.
Completely agree. And the MSM has claimed that the Bomford doc is a legit document and has claimed that the Kenyan doc is a fake which was based on the Bomford doc.
We never claimed the Kenyan doc was legit. We thought we needed more info. The MSM claimed the Bomford doc was legit, and were proven wrong in almost no time at all.
(Provided the Kenyan Lavender holds up)
I’d also keep pushing the book / page. A responsible journalist could have figured that out.
A ‘Sir Eric Lavender’ should appear in the London Gazette at the time he was knighted.
The only Eric Lavender I can find in the Gazette appears on 7th July 1950 as executor of a will.
On the Bomford doc, it’s G.F. Lavender.
It’s E.F. Lavender on the Kenyan doc.
My error - looked for Eric Lavender, not Edward Lavender. Correcting that with a new search now.
Well see #203....I think the aussie doc was copied....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.