Posted on 08/03/2009 2:12:53 PM PDT by Calpernia
There are now modified photos of the COLB that broke here yesterday. The changes are so slight, that no one is noticing them.
The original one posted in breaking news:
One of the modified ones:
The changes are so subtle, you can barely tell which one you are looking at.
This modified one is showing jokes like: The Font of the Certificate=Schmutz (A Schmutz is a chump, as in you are a chump) #5733=The number of the Certificate, is code for : "Problem with Windows REGISTRY", a sly reference to your claim that Obama does not appear on the Hawaii Live Birth Registry. 47O44=Easiest of all. BOH's age=47 0=O (if you look close you can tell that that is a Schmutz Font "Oh" not "Zero") EF Lavender is ORGANIC DISH SOAP
The original one does not say EF Lavender, it says KF Lavender. The original one shows the number is: 47,644.
The so-called “K” document presents one very significant problem. For all those claiming it’s a “K”, they need to explain why it appears to be a lower-case “k”. Does it look like a “k”? Yes, it LOOKS like a “k”. But if it’s a “k”, it’s lower-case, not upper - and improperly cased at that, if it’s someone’s first initial.
This leads me to believe that the “k” document is presenting a lower “k” because it’s a distorted capital “E”.
If you look at it from a distance, it appears to be an “E”. When you zoom in, the distortion is more apparent - kind of like looking at an Impressionest painting.
And if someone’s going to purposely distort with this much subtlety - to what end, I ask? It could easily be that the 47,044 is a legitimate coincidence, and there really is someone named E.F. Lavender. The purported letter “O” in the number could just as easily be a distorted “0” if the letter “E” can come out looking like a “k”.
It seems to me WE’RE the ones spending way too much time trying to de-construct a document that might very well be authentic in its “E.F. Lavender” form. I’ve followed this from top to bottom, and, although I am still mostly convinced that Obama was not born in the United States (why the obfuscation, Mr. President?), this supposedly altered document is a giant red herring.
Its post 52 on the original huge thread.
Yes, for the reasons I posted (which you chose to ignore and not respond to) it is obviously a fake, regardless of whether "the information in it checks out."
Why would the australian one be forged?
Gee, I don't know...maybe to make people think the Kenyan one was a fake? (Duh!)
You are one of the noob trolls I mentioned who are just trying to confuse people. Be gone troll!
One interview does not a person make.
Just my opinion....I think the motive is to take the attention off of the SCRBD site. The account holder of the SCRBD site that uploaded the docs can possibly be connected to the actual forger and or Orly. Otherwise, why all of the fuss over multiple versions of forged documents?
::shrugs::
Since you have access to your parents’ Australian BCs from the same era, would you please post them — with identifying info blacked out, of course?
No hanky-panky with the images, mind you. That would be discovered pronto.
We’d all like to see, and it would go a long way toward proving you aren’t a troll.
To: unspun
The Bomford birth certification is archived in Way Back as being from June 7, 2007 or before, Hanen found.
There has been no updating of his site, according to records also found by Hanen.
He might want to check again...
her last words were ‘Do not cry Tom, I am happy’ (Emails from Liz Conway 18 & 19 Feb 2007 and 2 Jul 2008
1,079 posted on Monday, August 03, 2009 11:59:03 PM by Krodg
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2307402/posts?page=1079#1079
Sorry. I still see at 400% an 'E'.
Adammon, are you and Palmer buddies? Or maybe the same?
I think someone earlier in the thread said it best. Orly has the physical copy, that’s the only one that matters. Arguing E vs K or 0 vs 6 only matters in the digital arena because of the lack of information otherwise.
The only reason I continue to come back to it is because there’s a lot of misinformation on what is Photoshopped, Photoshoppable and whether or not elite hackers broke into a myriad of websites at the same time to replace pictures to obfuscate a letter and a number.
Any chance you could post scans of your parents’ birth registrations?
And why on earth do you care if I don’t believe you?
This is a major source of confusion here on FR. Many people believe that she has a real physical document, not a copy. I'm not so sure - you may be right that she only has a copy.
Hopefully someone can enlighten us all on this important subject.
The photoshop layering and the inconsistent 1’s makes the Aussie birth certificate very suspicious. It’s highly possible he didn’t know it had been tampered with.
Can I use your compression trick to turn my dollars into 20s?
If I already conceded to you and told you you were brilliant, then why do you keep explaining yourself?
When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.
But she is a nut.
OK, but is that the part that is being related to the 'Kenya' doc? No!
The point is that the parts that are presented to 'de-bunk' the Kenya doc show clear evidence of difference from the legit portion of the doc. (note: that doesn'tmake the Kenya doc valid; it just makes the de-bunking a fraud)
If it says “Gecko” or “Iguana”, you may be in trouble!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.