Posted on 08/01/2009 9:41:52 PM PDT by FromLori
We all keep hearing of how the costs of healthcare have skyrocketed and that the government has to "do something" about it. Obama keeps claiming, despite the evidence put out by the Congressional Budget Office, that his plan will lower costs. Still, the cost issue is central to this debate so in that vein the House healthcare bill has a few interesting ways to address costs.
One of those cost saving measures seems to be a patient dumping plan that will move the elderly away from more expensive medical procedures and place them in an institutionalized "home" setting reminiscent of some bad horror movie mad-house scene.
CNSNews has learned that the House bill proposes to lower hospital visits by older patients by referring them to what is being called a "medical home pilot program." This will be a new sort of institution set up to accept the elderly that isn't staffed with doctors and high cost medical equipment but is instead staffed by nurse practitioners and other less trained personnel.
Critics of the idea, though, worry that this program will amount to patient dumping.
But physicians' groups say the legislation could lead to restrictions on which treatments may be used for certain conditions, despite the fact that some patients might require a unique or unconventional approach. It also may lead to dumping Medicare/Medicaid patients in facilities that are not required to have physicians on staff.
Worse, this idea might result in a one-size-fits-all style of medical assessment for patients that aren't as rich as others. It will likely result in policies and procedures that ignore the individual needs of patients shoving them into a situation where their needs are not taken into account. Additionally, this sort of policy would eliminate the recommendation of doctors for a rote policy. Sadly, these policies may not even contain costs.
"Evidence-based medicine may provide transitory savings in the short term, but the same patient who takes the cheapest available statin today may very well be the patient costing you -- the taxpayer, the policymaker, the thought-leader, the sister, the spouse -- big bucks when that patient ends up in the hospital because of improperly treated cardiovascular disease," .
"The repercussions of choosing short-term thinking over long-term results and cost-based medicine over patient-based are pernicious to both the public purse and the public health," the CMPI report said.
And, once again, it is easy to see that the freedom and liberty, not to mention the physical safety and medical condition, of the public is in second place where it concerns a government take over of healthcare
Apparently Obama believes that he is God.
It’s possible his wife is in the driver’s seat on this particular idea.
This whole thing sounds, how can I say it, “European”.
“This will be a new sort of institution set up to accept the elderly that isn’t staffed with doctors and high cost medical equipment but is instead staffed by nurse practitioners and other less trained personnel.”
0 proposes “final solution” for the sick elderly (and the fat)
I also heard that Obama is planning to increase the measley $255 death benefit to a much larger amount. The only problem is that there will be a tax to pay for it against the old age benefit. The tax will reduce 1% for each yearly reduction in age achieved by the perosn on Soc Sec. Neat, huh?
“The tax will reduce 1% for each yearly reduction in age achieved by the perosn on Soc Sec. Neat, huh?”
Won’t matter since my will states I should be sent to the local landfill with the rest of the garbage.
These people are sick and I mean really sick.
So whatcha don't know cain't possibly hurtcha!!!
Didn’t Michelle implement a patient dumping scheme for the Illinois hospital when she got paid $300,000+ ?
The story at http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/08/obamacare_to_dump_expensive_el.php is incorrect.
I notified Cybercast last week (Pete Winn) of the error and the story has been removed from CNS’s site. That is where the story originated.
“Medical home” is an administrative term in health care, not a building where people live.
Just search for the term, or go here: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/563437_2.
Well if you mean Nazi Germany you have a point!
For those interested, this is in the bill starting on line 4 of page 460.
Go read it yourself and be informed.
This practice is illegal as the state hospital system was ruled to be unconstitutional and demeaning the mentally Ill and those who resided in the state hosptials because their families were unable to care for them. This included the retarded and down syndrome people.
Now if they plan on a similar housing of the aged and infirm, that is apparently planned is not going to go too far.
...strange and scary, this new reality of “what was” only a generation ago against the “unwanted.” Ironic to think that the boomer generation, whose father’s fought in WWII against such an autorocity now face an autoricity themselves...
Obamacare... Taking care of the national debt one old fart at a time!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.