"DOD RETALIATION AGAINST MR. COOK IS SWIFT AND BRUTAL" (Orly Taitz Esq. Application for Injunction)

Orly Taitz Blog ^ | 7/15/2009 | Orly Taitz

[balls]

Major Cook has been fired from his civilian defense contractor job. See details at link.

[real_patriotic_american]

PING!

Honorary, courageous military man fired because Obama won’t prove that he is a natural born American citizen (which is a requirement to serve as President per the Constitution).

[MHGinTN]

The porblem is, Barry can produce a forgery to answer Taitz’s pleading and have his college records claiming foreign student status ignored!

[woops]

But don’t they have to be LEGAL orders?

Read Orly Taitz’s Injunction.

[Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!]

I clicked on the link and don’t see your title in context any where.

[ravingnutter]

One of the things about being a civilian defense contractor is that your employer (the DOD, when all is said and done) gets to say whether or not they're comfortable with you, personally, being on their base, doing their work.

We refer to the USAF as the "Customer"...with a capital C ; )...and yes, they totally control who we hire and terminate. I have had only one instance in 20 years, however, where they specifically requested we terminate someone without cause and while I didn't believe it was fair to terminate someone based on a "personality conflict", we did what they requested by eliminating that position and they transferred those duties to a civil service employee. DoD Contracting is a whole other world unto itself, standard business practices do not apply.

[ironwill]

I’m stealing that.

FUBO gear here

[drypowder]

Eventually, those involved in this will go down as well.

[balls]

Go to the link and do a string search for “swift and brutal”

[Red Steel]

I certainly hope Ms. Orly sat down and thoroughly explained the consensequenses and potential legal ramifications of hos actions to Major cook. Otherwise, she may have a very irritated client threatening a malpractice action..

I'm sure the Major thought of the retaliatory consequences before hand that could comes his way and made the personal determination that he could withstand it. He didn't need his lawyer to tell him otherwise. Say hello to Obama for us while he still is "in office".

[dragonblustar]

There seems to be a Facebook group supporting him.

[null and void]

Thanks!

[real_patriotic_american]

Correct! He’ll also go down for not being a natural born citizen.

You wrote-
“Eventually, those involved in this will go down as well.”

[JasonC]

Who?

Why do you expect anyone to know what you are talking about?

[Red Steel]

I imagine Obama’s goons pulled his security clearance.

If so, sadly ironic since the Obama administration is the largest National Security risk breach this nation has ever seen.

[null and void]

Testing:

CNSEQUENCES

ELECTIONS HAVE
CNSEQUENCES

[JPII Be Not Afraid]

The evidence contained in Exhibit E shows that Barack Hussein Obama might have used as many as 149 addresses and 39 social security numbers prior to assuming the office of President. The social security number most commonly used by Barack Hussein Obama, is one issued in the state of Connecticut, the state where Barack Hussein Obama never resided and it shows him to be 119 years old. This coupled with the fact that Mr. Obama’s grandmother, Madeline Dunham was a volunteer at the Oahu Circuit Court Probate Department and had access to the social security numbers of the deceased, constitutes circumstantial evidence casting serious doubt on the legitimacy of Mr. Obama and his claims of being born on US territory. never heard this before.

[TYVets]

There are a lot of small minded people when it comes to disagreeing with their politics and/or religion.

I am biased, but I feel and see far more verbal attacks made by liberals than by conservatives should you or I not fill into their mold on any subject.

We have a liberal daughter who is that way. Not a happy position for parents to be in. Thank heavens she lives many miles away and has no children for us to spoil.

Personal revenge by an employer is a terrible thing to see. Many times they are so blinded by their need for retaliation that they leave themselves open to law suits.

The type that works for the federal government can hide behind the fact that you or I are paying their attorney fees. Not an easy system for justice to prevail.

Hang in there, stay the course and be well my hope is you will get your fair day in court.

[norton]

IIRC, there are generally clauses in government contracts and sub's that provide for removal of personnel from a specific role in direct contact with customer personnel, at the customer's location, or having direct impact on buyer / seller interaction. That removal requires cause and generally means the Program Manager can't get along with the Contracting Officer or Quality Assurance, maybe he or she just fails to believe the procurement spec actually means what it says.

It is not in place to punish whistle blowers (which Cook is not) or litigants in marginally related law suits (and this would be very marginal). It is not a frequently exercised option and I never knew it to lead to dismissal:
But it's there.

Employer's "best" option would be to say the customer has requested removal, cite the given cause, and offer any of a number of far less desirable jobs (at same grade and salary) hoping Cook would resign. More likely, they might have called it a lay off due to lack of alternative tasking but that would imply some degree of consideration (time and money).

To fire him, apparently without severance consideration, merely underlines that he is being punished. It also largely dooms his expectation of any other job in his field of expertise.

To address other poster opinions:
Some DoD civilian jobs do require reserve status. I don't think the same condition would be legally applicable to a private sector employee. I certainly don't think it applies to Cook's job in the private sector. (We deploy civilian contractors every day without any reserve / military status at all.)
Cook questioned an order, which was rescinded. He did not refuse an order that was legitimate enough to be allowed to stand.

[balls]

Lou Dobbs is talking about this right now at: http://www.waamannarbor.com/

Freep Lou Dobbs’ poll on the eligibility issue at: http://www.loudobbsradio.com/

[Red Steel]

Some info on the strangeness of Obama’s SSN:

“A comment about the Obama SSN from a reader
Entering 042-68-xxxx reveals Obama’s ss# was issued in Connecticut in 1976-1977. Obama was living in Hawaii at that time and would have been around 15 or 16 years old. *Why didn’t he simply get his ss# in Hawaii? Could it be because, at the time, he was Barry Soetoro, Indonesian citizen, thus ineligible to get a U.S. ss# ? His mother/grandmother must have had a contact in Connecticut who illegally (?) obtained the ss# for Barack.....”

http://drorly.blogspot.com/2009/01/comment-about-obama-ssn-from-reader.html