Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin Attacks Obama in WaPo Op-ed, How Will Media Respond?
NewsBusters.com ^ | 07/14/2009 | Noel Sheppard

Posted on 07/14/2009 4:51:33 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

If Palin Derangement Syndrome-afflicted media members thought the Alaska Governor's surprising pre-Fourth of July announcement meant she was getting out of politics, her op-ed in Tuesday's Washington Post should change their minds.

In a scathing rebuke of the Obama administration, Sarah Palin took off the gloves to attack the recently House-passed American Clean Energy and Security Act, disaffectionately known as cap-and-tax.

Marvelously, Palin also took a couple of jabs at her not so adoring press:

Unfortunately, many in the national media would rather focus on the personality-driven political gossip of the day than on the gravity of these challenges. So, at risk of disappointing the chattering class, let me make clear what is foremost on my mind and where my focus will be:

I am deeply concerned about President Obama's cap-and-trade energy plan, and I believe it is an enormous threat to our economy. It would undermine our recovery over the short term and would inflict permanent damage.

American prosperity has always been driven by the steady supply of abundant, affordable energy. Particularly in Alaska, we understand the inherent link between energy and prosperity, energy and opportunity, and energy and security. Consequently, many of us in this huge, energy-rich state recognize that the president's cap-and-trade energy tax would adversely affect every aspect of the U.S. economy.

There is no denying that as the world becomes more industrialized, we need to reform our energy policy and become less dependent on foreign energy sources. But the answer doesn't lie in making energy scarcer and more expensive! Those who understand the issue know we can meet our energy needs and environmental challenges without destroying America's economy.

Job losses are so certain under this new cap-and-tax plan that it includes a provision accommodating newly unemployed workers from the resulting dried-up energy sector, to the tune of $4.2 billion over eight years. So much for creating jobs.

In addition to immediately increasing unemployment in the energy sector, even more American jobs will be threatened by the rising cost of doing business under the cap-and-tax plan. For example, the cost of farming will certainly increase, driving down farm incomes while driving up grocery prices. The costs of manufacturing, warehousing and transportation will also increase.

The ironic beauty in this plan? Soon, even the most ardent liberal will understand supply-side economics.

Ouch! That's gonna leave a mark...likely on many of her detractors, assuming, of course, they get the joke.

That said, readers are encouraged to review the entire piece, and ponder just how this is going to play at Palin-hating media outlets the next 48 hours.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: bho44; capandtax; capandtrade; economy; energy; herecomethemittbots; justsaynotomitt; nomorerinos; obama; palin; palin2012; pds; sarahpalin; trueconservatism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-135 next last
To: MuttTheHoople
The only thing I disagree with is Palin continuing to go to Leftist new sources (interviews with Chucky Gibson and the Perky Katie Couric) and now Editorials in the Washington Post. She needs to stick to Fox News, National Review, and American Spectator.

She needs to do both. The kind of people who read National Review and American Spectator are already mostly on board. She needs to reach people who would vote Dem, and plant seeds of doubt in the minds about the wisdom of the Dem agenda.

61 posted on 07/14/2009 5:58:42 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

I didn’t see /s sorry


62 posted on 07/14/2009 5:58:52 AM PDT by BornToBeAmerican (We the people, ..... never)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
She nailed it. She dragged the Obama-Pelosi cap and trade con into the light of day and showed it as the mother of all tax hikes (in the form of vast, systemic price increases) that it is.

Now, if the liberal media truly believes its own spew that she is an intellectual and policy lightweight they will ignore this Op Ed piece. If the writer is an airhead, after all, why waste ink and air time bothering to respond?

I suspect there will be a response, a cacophonous era-piercing howl from the left and that whole barrels of ink will be spilled.

63 posted on 07/14/2009 6:00:34 AM PDT by behzinlea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
She nailed it. She dragged the Obama-Pelosi cap and trade con into the light of day and showed it as the mother of all tax hikes (in the form of vast, systemic price increases) that it is.

Now, if the liberal media truly believes its own spew that she is an intellectual and policy lightweight they will ignore this Op Ed piece. If the writer is an airhead, after all, why waste ink and air time bothering to respond?

I suspect there will be a response, a cacophonous ear-piercing howl from the left and that whole barrels of ink will be spilled.

64 posted on 07/14/2009 6:00:55 AM PDT by behzinlea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook
True enough, but Palin must now distance herself from McCain on a number of these issues if she has any future political ambitions. Palin had to support McCain's policy positions as the VP candidate. She must now disassociate herself strongly from them, including amnesty and cap and trade.
65 posted on 07/14/2009 6:01:56 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: kabar
She must now disassociate herself strongly from them, including amnesty and cap and trade.

Not to be picky, but didn't she just start that with this op-ed?

66 posted on 07/14/2009 6:08:01 AM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Indexing RELATED threads:
The 'Cap And Tax' Dead End by Sarah Palin
 
07/14/2009 3:26:55 AM PDT · by DB9 · 56 replies · 1,467+ views
Washington Post ^ | July 14, 2009 | Sarah Palin
 

Governor Palin: Yes, We Can. Just Not With Øbama's Cap-&-Tax
 
07/13/2009 10:24:44 PM PDT · by MaxCUA · 1 reply · 312+ views
Governor Palin 4 President ^
 

The 'Cap And Tax' Dead End (Palin WaPo Op-Ed)
 
07/13/2009 8:34:34 PM PDT · by redk · 188 replies · 3,485+ views
Washington Post ^ | Tuesday, July 14, 2009 | Sarah Palin
 

Sarah Palin-The 'Cap And Tax' Dead End
 
07/13/2009 8:25:11 PM PDT · by Sarah Barracuda · 11 replies · 504+ views
washingtonpost.com ^ | 7-14-09 | Sarah Palin
 

The 'Cap And Tax' Dead End by Sarah Palin
 
07/13/2009 8:22:06 PM PDT · by nomoremods · 64 replies · 1,396+ views
Washington Post ^ | 7-14-09 | Sarah Palin
and

Palin Attacks Obama in WaPo Op-ed, How Will Media Respond?

 
Tuesday, July 14, 2009 4:51:33 AM · by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle · 54 replies · 1,223+ views
NewsBusters.com ^ | 07/14/2009 | Noel Sheppard


67 posted on 07/14/2009 6:08:06 AM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar
We do need to keep within our two minutes. But I just wanted to ask you, do you support capping carbon emissions? PALIN: I do. I do.

Supporting limits on carbon emissions is not the same as supporting the Democrats current "cap and trade" legislation.

68 posted on 07/14/2009 6:10:40 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Yes, and now she must do even more. My greatest fear is that she will campaign for McCain in the 2010 AZ primary out of a sense of obligation for his selecting her as his VP. If she does that, she will be seriously damaged politically within the GOP.


69 posted on 07/14/2009 6:11:37 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Excellent. She is using her notoriety with the lame stream media as a loud speaker to shout what the rest of the country desperately needs to hear before it's too late.

May this be her first of many full contact round house kicks to the thick headed libs.

70 posted on 07/14/2009 6:13:34 AM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoodDay; McGruff
IFILL: We do need to keep within our two minutes. But I just wanted to ask you, do you support capping carbon emissions?

PALIN: I do. I do.

Not cap and trade, just cap.

71 posted on 07/14/2009 6:14:02 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Pietro
Sarah needs to study deeply the way that RR handled the press. They hated him as well and yet he was able to talk past them and directly to the people.

She needs to start her own blog, and youtube channel. Allow people to get her message directly, bypassing any editing by the MSM.

72 posted on 07/14/2009 6:16:10 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: kabar
I would be really surprised if she doesn't continue to do more. As to campaigning for McCain, why is that such a deal killer? I don't like McCain very much at all, but for her to campaign for the man who made her his VP choice on the national ticket wouldn't particularly upset me.

Now if she goes out of her way and campaigns for the lib GOP Maine senators, that would give me a lot of heart burn.......

73 posted on 07/14/2009 6:16:26 AM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
Palin was agreeing with her running mate, McCain, about a cap and trade system. How would she propose to cap carbon emissions and is it really necessary in terms of "global warming," which is not manmade?

Let's just call a spade a spade. Palin had to support McCain's policy positions, even though she may have disagreed with them personally. It was the sina qua non for accepting the nomination as VP. Trying to defend her statements while running as VP is pointless. Now is the time for her to be her own woman and distance herself from McCain who will prove to be the albatross around her neck if she doesn't.

74 posted on 07/14/2009 6:18:16 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

To: RegulatorCountry

Yes, she should just come out and say exactly that, reference that event in the debate, and move on. Done. Ignore it, and it’ll keep coming up.


76 posted on 07/14/2009 6:22:34 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (No Representation without Taxation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
"She needs to start her own blog, and youtube channel. Allow people to get her message directly, bypassing any editing by the MSM."

That'll work for movement conservatives but not for the general public who will be feed a steady diet of anti-Palin pablum.

Whether she wants to or not she'll need to have a presense in that arena and the sooner she is able to self-define her presence there the sooner they'll have to take her seriously.

It can't be avoided.

77 posted on 07/14/2009 6:23:53 AM PDT by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
As to campaigning for McCain, why is that such a deal killer? I don't like McCain very much at all, but for her to campaign for the man who made her his VP choice on the national ticket wouldn't particularly upset me.

McCain supports amnesty, which will destroy this country with the stroke of a pen. He also supports a cap and trade system that will wreck the economy even further. McCain is against drilling in ANWR. He helped curtail political free speech with McCain-Feingold.

If Palin supports the GOP's self-described maverick who ran such a lousy campaign against Obama, what kind of message does this send to conservatives? Palin should distance herself from McCain if she has future political aspirations. For me, it would be a dealbreaker if she actively supports McCain's reelection by campaigning for him in AZ.

78 posted on 07/14/2009 6:24:31 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

That’s sort of a fine hair split there.


79 posted on 07/14/2009 6:25:43 AM PDT by MilspecRob (Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

So far this is the first conservative blog I’ve seen that has addressed her op-ed. She has many critics in the so-called Republican community. Will also be interesting to hear their comments. They might have to sputter out the fact that maybe they were wrong about her motives in resigning.


80 posted on 07/14/2009 6:29:00 AM PDT by TexasKate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson